I'm sure part of the reason that results are better with short esters is simply that greater injection frequency is required - thus the volume of oil is higher, creating more fascia stretch like SEO's.
Sent from my HTC Thunderbolt using Tapatalk
This is where I am skeptical and tend to both agree and disagree and it may
seem the shorter estered gear works 'better' to increase size because of this:
Most gear causes swelling giving a physically larger muscle due to the inflammation.
More shots = more inflammation = greater size.
BUT
Using that logic how is it that the muscle itself is growing? If anything the
greater injection frequency with short ester gear means shooting the muscle
group more often then not when it is still inflamed from the previous shot.
Shooting irritants into an already irritated area is only going to serve to
create scar tissue. Not stretch the fascia.
If this is how site injections serve to increase muscle size then it would seem
you would be doing more harm then good.
Just my theory. It will work for some people no doubt as there are plenty of
people for both sides of the argument and I am not going to argue it with
people like johnjuanb1 as he clearly has great arms. I would just wonder how
much of that size would you attribute to scar tissue created from the all the
gear you shoot there on such a frequent basis.
.gif "IP Gear")
