Kilo Klub Member
- Jun 6, 2010
I guess, but im just going off of 1000s of reviews and discussions and all of that.Aren't you stating opinions as facts aswell?
It's like you just know every pros true cycle.
I see your anecdotal evidence...
And you're talking about guys anecdotal evidence.
What about the physiques built off lower test and higher anabolics? You're just gonna dismiss them as opinion?
My push on the last poster was, "give me somethign other than, I HATE IT and IT SUCKS."
I dont know any SHW big guys who didnt have to push test.
I'm just talking like majority here. The fact is, the top amateurs and pros and guys who just look great that i talk to about cycling HAD to do test to get there. I guess they couldve tried other ways, but I dont know anyone who went the No test route. Yes, its getting popular in the past decade but if that viewpoint could change the game, it still hasn't.
Most BBers realize they NEED it if they want to get to higher and higher levels of LBM.
That's the social norm or dogma as of right now in BBing.
I also realize that LOTS of guys are sensitive to it and dont like how they feel. Even then, they might not like the look, but I would be willing to bet if they stayed the course, they would end up being lb for lb larger doing the test route.
And i wont dismiss the high anabolic, no/low test route. That was the classic guys from the 70s and what do we think about them. Yeah, they look great but they are lacking in size and lots of other stuff. Once test came up, it was a different BBing game.
Other then those guys, people have left that way of thinking. Yes, there are people that cannot do or dont enjoy high test, but IMO they are the minority.