Elvia1023
Featured Member / Supp Guru / Board Supporter
Featured Member
Kilo Klub Member
Registered
Board Supporter
Verified Customer
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2008
- Messages
- 27,443
You are reading that correctly. I want to stress the muscle, not the connective tissue.
I never squat "ass to grass." Tom platz could. How Tom Platz' femurs are set in his pelvis is different then mine though. How deep can you squat without the sacrum tucking under? That should influence your training range.
When I coach athletes that aren't powerlifters (from adolescents to NFL players), I box squat all of them above parallel and I teach them to hinge back, not squat down.
But for strictly hypertrophy?
I look for examples of populations that have built significant amount of muscle without trying. What are they doing? Can that be extrapolated.
Consider sprint cyclists. They have some of the largest quads you'll see outside of bodybuilding. The quad is never taken to complete flexion or extension in cycling. But it is high amounts of effort with constant tension and no rest for extended duration.
I rarely post training videos because people will tell me I'm wrong. But I'm not selling anything. I'm simply suggesting an alternative with my umdetly reasoning.
It all can work and many have grew amazing quads lifting with a very limited range of motion. Constantly training the muscle and pumping loads of blood in there is only going to make them grow. Consistency with any training style (as long as it's safe) with a good diet is going to produce results. Even if someone has attained good results training a more standard way I am sure if they swopped to something like you do it's a different stimulus so they would benefit from it.
I will say if someone has bad genetics they will struggle to grow their legs just training with a limited ROM and incorporating different approaches for different movements would be optimal. I know you know that and you are talking about your approach for certain movements. I assume you aren't using a short ROM for everything you do. Although even that has worked amazingly well for some people (Jason Huh for example).
There are plenty of guys squatting with a tiny range of motion and they simply will never grow their legs but it's still working to an extent. Most people in my experience benefit greatly using full ROM for movements such as leg press and hack squats. Someone just posted about pausing at the top and that is entirely different. I just mean putting the quads through a full ROM and if you want to pause at the top or just do them continuously with constant tension until failure (optimal) it all works.
Incorporating half reps with more weight can be great too but the full rom reps can really make a different. Obviously full ROM can be different for everyone but they should all be working on hip and ankle flexibility and overall mobility/flexibility so being able to hit what I call full ROM on a leg press safely (back not coming off the pad etc) is achieved through time. If people need someone to look at to know what I mean watch Nick Walker or John Jewett leg press.
You mention sprint cyclists and that is a very valid point. It definitely adds to their quad size. Just the same as horse riders and calves or gymnasts and arms/chests etc. I will say though most of the sprint cyclists with enormous quads are squatting massive weight with full ROM. The one with the biggest quads is split squatting the same weight most others squat with and his ROM is very deep. That doesn't mean partial range of motion wouldn't work for him either but using both approaches is what most people tend to do.









































































