- Joined
- Jun 5, 2002
- Messages
- 8,897
i have a friend who used to work out at my gym and is a sports caster.. he has a brother who is also in the media and is a writer for major newspaper on the west coast.. i am friends with both and got to know the brother on his visits.. (some of the guys on this board from my hometown will know who i am talking about) anyway, i e mailed him a few days ago and asked him about the benoit deal and why the journalist are not providing facts ect ect.. he called me today..
he was laughing about the tox reports and the reaction of the writers and editors.. he said that they knew that they were caught with their pants down and were figuring ways to spin it in their favor.. he said that they came up with the idea to just focus on the test amounts and to not talk about the examiners comments on roid rage and that he did not believe that it was the cause.. he said that a lady who was in the morning meetings said "why dont we just take the examiners notes point by point and let the readers decide on the facts?".. he said the assist editor looked at her and said "we will look like idiots and we will never retract a story.. go with the testosterone in the urine headline and leave the examiners notes out.. then drop it.."..
when he told me that i got pissed and started ranting and he said .. and i quote.. " you dont get facts from the news.. you have to dig much deeper.. we are entertainers not eductators".. he did not mean to be a ass with that statement.. he was just stating a fact.. a sad, sad fact..
he was laughing about the tox reports and the reaction of the writers and editors.. he said that they knew that they were caught with their pants down and were figuring ways to spin it in their favor.. he said that they came up with the idea to just focus on the test amounts and to not talk about the examiners comments on roid rage and that he did not believe that it was the cause.. he said that a lady who was in the morning meetings said "why dont we just take the examiners notes point by point and let the readers decide on the facts?".. he said the assist editor looked at her and said "we will look like idiots and we will never retract a story.. go with the testosterone in the urine headline and leave the examiners notes out.. then drop it.."..
when he told me that i got pissed and started ranting and he said .. and i quote.. " you dont get facts from the news.. you have to dig much deeper.. we are entertainers not eductators".. he did not mean to be a ass with that statement.. he was just stating a fact.. a sad, sad fact..