To avoid aches and pains and work around injuries, I would rather use high reps with an explosive positive and a controlled negative, rather than directly lightening the load by doing reps super slow.
I doubt super slow reps' efficacy for building muscle, while high reps, if done to failure, should provide an equal growth stimulus as lower reps done to failure. Science confirms this. I've yet to see science advocating super slow reps on the other hand.
super slow makes no sense.
u need to use light weights, just do more reps, or more reps faster.
no scientifically proven studies validate slow reps. at all.
in fact, volume is key. reps.
tut, super slow, not drivers of muscle growth.