- Joined
- Sep 16, 2005
- Messages
- 429
NO.......SHE LOOKS NO DIFFERENT THAN OTHER WOMEN BODYBUILDERS WITH IMPLANTS AND MASCULINE FEATURES. SHE IS JUST NOT AS RIPPED.
You looking at the same girl as me? To me and obviosly many others she has a different look. She def don't look masculine at all especially in the face and has the right amount of muscle imo.
IF THE GIRL YOU ARE LOOKING AT HAS IMPLANTS, IS MASCULINE LOOKING AND SOMEWHAT SOFTER THAN TYPICAL WOMEN COMPETITORS THEN YES, IT IS THE SAME GIRL.
As long as it's BODYBUILDING, the women will continue to look as they do. They may start trending toward smaller women and judging the larger physiques more harshly. These women are being judged on their physiques - not their looks. The women that people single out as being ugly or masculine are more often than not in contest shape. Well, that's what happens to a woman when her body fat % is in the low single digits! Once these same women are carrying more body fat they regain that feminine look IMO. When Flex Magazine used to do the lingerie issues I remember thinking that some of the female bodybuilders I thought looked too big or masculine on stage looked pretty damn good in the offseason (with a teddy on, of course )
Sick of this shit
People, if you dont like women's bodybuilding, dont watch it!
Isnt it so simple?
Why do you judge them by your standards of attractiveness?
If its "too much muscle" for you, guess what, there are other disciplines, such as figure fitness.
Leave the goddamn girls alone, let them do what they want to do.