- Joined
- Jun 12, 2003
- Messages
- 4,665
The latter route makes sense if you are happy with the amount of mass you've accumulated, and aren't planning to go up a weight class for your next show. If you're looking to put on a ton of LBM, and come in say 15-20 lbs above your stage weight from the previous year, it's going to be really difficult while staying below 10%. Dusty made huge strides by going up near 300 lbs in the off season, but this year he plans to stay below 10% because he's now fine tuning things. He wasn't out-sized by anyone at the USAs, but he needs more mass in certain areas. He made a post at IM to that effect, but if I misinterpreted it hopefully he chimes in.
Nope you are correct in that. We needed to get Dusty to National SuperHeavyweight size. When he started with me he was pretty much weighing in the offseason what he now weighs in at onstage. You obviously cant go up next to Burnieka at one inch taller weighing 225.....and Dustys arms and his back were really subpar...they had to catch up dramatically to his legs (we still laugh at this because this somehow backfired a little bit and now his back and his arms have come up so dramatically that they overshadow other things)....I digress.......I always use 40 pounds as the marker for myself
want to be 255 onstage...better be weighing 295 offseason
want to be a top of the class 198 lighheavy...better be 238 offseason
want to be a top of the class 225 heavy...better be 265 offseason
Its not exact....but its close enough....going to 45 would be even better...but 40 is just about spot on. Look at someone like Kyle Witherspoon who went in the lightheavies in awesome shape....he has to go to the heavies to succeed.....he just wasnt eating enough in the offseason....he came in around 195 and he walks around in the offseason at 225 in unbelievable shape (I would say Tenny shape in the offseason....really hard)....so to become a heavyweight Kyle is going to have to go to about 250 (and thats the least he has to be)....and stay there until its dense feasible tissue that wont be lost in the dieting process (thats the key to this whole thing)......TIME=DENSITY
With Dusty we went up to 297 that first offseason and then he dieted down to 245 on stageish (won the Border States and overall)....so 50 pounds over....but his contest weight jumped up 20 pounds.....then he had the hernia operation and lost 4 months of training there.....we quickly went up to about 313 pounds.....held it and then it all started coming down slowly.....cleaned things up and stayed at 290 (way harder than his previous 290).....cleaned up things a little bit more and stayed at about 285 (rock hard at this weight).....and then came into the USA's at 268...so another 20-23 pound jump in a year.
This year and i just talked to him about this part the other day....I want to put him on a 1x bodypart hit a week split simply because he has the size now....he can stand with anyone.....its there.....it aint going nowhere.....so Aceto wants him to stay at 285ish.....i want to stop doing the 2x every 8 days bodypart plan and i want to hammer his quads, calves, hamstrings and upper chest.....feel like i can do it better this way. This is a rare occurence though where someone is as big as he needs to be for the most part.....I dont come across that often....we still will always try to get him larger but its "dont need to go up high in bodyweight and lets hammer the hell out of the quads" this time around......there are some plus and minus's to doing it this way.
a) would he gain more size in his quads if we went "size pronto" again? probably
b) when its just a few things that need to be fixed is it worth going up to 313 right now? Not really because i think it can get done this way also (not as much size as taking off the governor but enough to make the difference that needs to be made)
Last edited: