Tren was better when I was younger, test was better when I was younger, Deca was better when I was younger...because I was younger.
The compounds haven't changed, but the user sure has changed. Guys my age will rave about the Rugby Dbol or Syntex Anadrol or yellow-top Deca they had when they were young, and how the new stuff doesn't compare. But the hormones are still the same, the difference is we all got old and now the same things don't work for us the same way they used to.
I used to get all the gains and few of the side effects. Now in my 50's, that has reversed and I seem to get all the side effects and few of the gains. But the drugs haven't changed. What changed was me, and the environment in which you are asking the drugs to do their work.
Getting old sucks LOL. That's the problem.
No estro in fina pellets i believe you are thinking of the synovexI feel like there is no logical reason it would be weaker. Back in the day when they used pellets did a fair amount of estro get in the final product? Isn't tren more powerful when mixed with some estro?
No estro in fina pellets i believe you are thinking of the synovex
Funny you say this im abusing mast ,, not real bad 300mg a week for a whole year now, im stopping it now.I wonder then maybe if it had to do with people using too much anti estrogen now a days, and abusing masteron?
Meaning back in the day guys were running tren, test, dbol. Now you see more low test and tren with mast, so we dont quite see it as being powerful?
My only guess lol
I put mine in a drinking straw,fold and pinch the ends down, and lightly tap it with a hammer to powder them downYes...he is thinking of synovex.
We crushed our fina pellets with a spoon and dumped in isopropyl alcohol bottle top...mixed with isopropyl alcohol with needle cover sucked up with needle off and shot it. lol
The good old days. lol
I agree 100%!i always thought the diesel taste n cough was a good thing! lol
thats said i used to use 700mgs of tren from pellets and had to tap out at less then 150mgs o base...
things should be things its the user that generally changes
But then you have so many anecdotes about tren in particular about how strong the pellets were compared to what you'd get from a UGL. Tren acetate = tren acetate, obviously, so what is it? Good Ole fashioned nostalgia? Inaccuracy in brewing pellets and perhaps making it stronger? I also remember there being a big deal about side effects from the pellets, but the strength and size gains were ridiculous compared to tren ace you buy off the shelf now. I'm kinda leaning towards nostalgia, but time and time again this comes up... The home brewed pellets vs ugl. You were newer then, so obviously the tren would have seemed much stronger, I imagine?
Edit these are all just rhetorical questions and I'm just rattling on, OP, they aren't really questions at you