kinglewy
Banned
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2011
- Messages
- 2,252
My first time with tren ace I only ran it for about 6 weeks or so(insomnia was too much for me) last Dec-Jan. The strength gains were pretty good though, atleast for me, my bench went from 315x5 to 355x8, don't have a spotter so I never try 1 rep maxes I just use the bench press calculator.
Well the cool thing is that I have kept about 95% of the strength I gained off that 6 week run, my bench has dropped to 355x5 now and I am only currently cruising on a low dose of test. I am planning my next run with tren and I can't wait to see the strength gains this time, I would like to get to 405for reps if I can.
But my question is this: when you see a guy with a huge bench (Andy Haman comes to mind 600x3 reps) is it correct to assume that it took many runs with tren to get up that high in the first place, slowly gaining the strength and then coming down a little and then back up again higher than the last time? Up and down with the tren gains? Just asking because none of the other AAS that I have yet tried gave me that kind of strength or let me keep it after I discontinued it's use.
Well the cool thing is that I have kept about 95% of the strength I gained off that 6 week run, my bench has dropped to 355x5 now and I am only currently cruising on a low dose of test. I am planning my next run with tren and I can't wait to see the strength gains this time, I would like to get to 405for reps if I can.
But my question is this: when you see a guy with a huge bench (Andy Haman comes to mind 600x3 reps) is it correct to assume that it took many runs with tren to get up that high in the first place, slowly gaining the strength and then coming down a little and then back up again higher than the last time? Up and down with the tren gains? Just asking because none of the other AAS that I have yet tried gave me that kind of strength or let me keep it after I discontinued it's use.