Vet Grade vs UG Lab

[showstopper83]

Can guys who have ran vet grade EQ and Winstrol comment on effectiveness and how they felt on it vs ug? Debating if its worth it to run an no-ug cycle stack.

 

[Elvia1023]

Well considering UG gear ranges from utter shit to fantastic it's quite a massive spectrum. Good gear is good gear. If you find a good UG lab it's just as good as any pharm or vet gear. If you don't trust UG gear just go with a vet product and see how that feels.

 

[heavyhitter]

If you’re asking if legit vet grade is better....if you know what you’re getting is real I’d prefer vet grade over Ug

 

[qbkilla]

I've read posts where guys swear thst the low mg per ml vet grade eq is superior to ug, no idea if true. Not a fan of eq myself so a moot point. I always opt for a quality ugl over hg ever since the market become flooded with counterfits. I remember back when icns had no fakes then all of a sudden the "experts" were arguing over which icn was the real one online. That turned me off to hg gear.

 

[ironmaster1]

I would like to say EQ is great. It is one of my fav to cycle. Back in the day I would get vet grade 50mg/ml and would run 300-400mg per week and results unmatched. This is was back in the mid 90's. I have used some of the UGL stuff in recent years and must say it can be hit and miss. UGL make them in 200mg/ml so it cuts down on volume to inject so that makes it better. But still I think the vet grade was much better back in the day. I have posted a pic of one of my vials I used back in the 90's.

 

[N.L....M.....]

I would like to say EQ is great. It is one of my fav to cycle. Back in the day I would get vet grade 50mg/ml and would run 300-400mg per week and results unmatched. This is was back in the mid 90's. I have used some of the UGL stuff in recent years and must say it can be hit and miss. UGL make them in 200mg/ml so it cuts down on volume to inject so that makes it better. But still I think the vet grade was much better back in the day. I have posted a pic of one of my vials I used back in the 90's.

Of course mg per mg it was more effective years ago, you didn’t have as much time training or under gear use as you do now.
If the compound and mg is the same then there literally cannot be a difference in effectiveness.

 

[mexbeast]

People have some weird believes! I'm on dr prescribed test, it's not any better than all the fricking udg or vet stuff i ever took, a drug it's not different from its own kind unless it's a different drug

 

[cage99]

I prefer my home brew to my Rx test. Course I thin mine out and beef up the concentration. Sooooo that’s why I prefer mine!

If the products are both dosed the same (mg vs. mg) there will be no difference between them potency wise. Now the solvents used to make them could differ quite a lot. That’s the only difference I ever notice.

Cage

 

[b_cornelius]

Are we talking the original Equipoise and Winny V? Name band pharma for a horse and a cow?

 

[totalrecomp]

If by vet we are talking Brovel or Tornell T-200 circa 2000 vs any half way decent UGL test cyp?? UGL all day. Like most things in life, it depends.

 

[Alzadosghost]

I procured a couple winstrol v jugs in the 90’s from a vet assistant gf. It was good. Free gear is always good right? Lol But I wouldn’t say it’s any better than properly dosed ug stuff. 50mg is 50mg if it contains 50mg.

 

[beast405]

A good ug product will be just as good. No doubt.