- Joined
- Jun 25, 2008
- Messages
- 2,240
I've found that some women will have bigger boobs and less on the hips/butt area.
Where as others are opposite, some have both, but it's rare and... Those who have more on top, rarely build the glutes to match and if and when they do, they'll lose a lot when they diet down. Similar to men, I'm the opposite, I can get my lower body to grow in the offseason and they'll still have striations even when my upper body gets fat, but I'll lose a lot of the gains when I diet down...
Either way, I feel that the Wellness division is for women who are lower body dominant... My GF (she's Nikki_Wellness on PM) is in my opinion the perfect example of what Wellness was meant to be...
Here are the criteria directly from the NPC website:
-Level of conditioning?
We are looking for conditioning almost on par with Bikini athletes, but the athletes will have slightly more muscle. We want to see a little body fat with slight separation but no striations.
-Abs defined like Figure or less defined like Bikini?
As it currently is in Bikini.
-Shoulders? Rounded & Capped like Figure and Women’s Physique or less pronounced like Bikini?
Slightly more developed than Bikini and a little less than Figure, but not as lean and with no striations. Not like Women’s Physique.
-How much definition for quads?
The quads should display an athletic appearance with slight separation but no striations. Not as lean and defined as Figure and Women’s Physique.
-Glute Development?
Full round glutes with a slight separation between the hamstring and glute area but no striations, as is in place for the Bikini Division. Glutes will be bigger than current Bikini competitors. They will not be as lean and defined as Figure and Women’s Physique.
My goals for her are to lean out a little bit more, especially bring in her abs more and make her waist a little smaller and tighten the glutes and hams slightly. But the thing is that I've looked at the advanced Wellness competitors and they've deviated from what the criteria as listed on their site. I see girls who are very lean and have striations and very little fat. It's frustrating, because when the judging isn't consistent, almost any decision can be justified... But if the criteria states that they want to see some fat and some softness, then why are they awarding the titles to very lean girls with no fat?
Regardless, she's 5 weeks out and this is where she is now as of today: (the last pic with the hooters outfit was last week)
Any input would be appreciated.
Where as others are opposite, some have both, but it's rare and... Those who have more on top, rarely build the glutes to match and if and when they do, they'll lose a lot when they diet down. Similar to men, I'm the opposite, I can get my lower body to grow in the offseason and they'll still have striations even when my upper body gets fat, but I'll lose a lot of the gains when I diet down...
Either way, I feel that the Wellness division is for women who are lower body dominant... My GF (she's Nikki_Wellness on PM) is in my opinion the perfect example of what Wellness was meant to be...
Here are the criteria directly from the NPC website:
-Level of conditioning?
We are looking for conditioning almost on par with Bikini athletes, but the athletes will have slightly more muscle. We want to see a little body fat with slight separation but no striations.
-Abs defined like Figure or less defined like Bikini?
As it currently is in Bikini.
-Shoulders? Rounded & Capped like Figure and Women’s Physique or less pronounced like Bikini?
Slightly more developed than Bikini and a little less than Figure, but not as lean and with no striations. Not like Women’s Physique.
-How much definition for quads?
The quads should display an athletic appearance with slight separation but no striations. Not as lean and defined as Figure and Women’s Physique.
-Glute Development?
Full round glutes with a slight separation between the hamstring and glute area but no striations, as is in place for the Bikini Division. Glutes will be bigger than current Bikini competitors. They will not be as lean and defined as Figure and Women’s Physique.
My goals for her are to lean out a little bit more, especially bring in her abs more and make her waist a little smaller and tighten the glutes and hams slightly. But the thing is that I've looked at the advanced Wellness competitors and they've deviated from what the criteria as listed on their site. I see girls who are very lean and have striations and very little fat. It's frustrating, because when the judging isn't consistent, almost any decision can be justified... But if the criteria states that they want to see some fat and some softness, then why are they awarding the titles to very lean girls with no fat?
Regardless, she's 5 weeks out and this is where she is now as of today: (the last pic with the hooters outfit was last week)
Any input would be appreciated.