And at least the long term health consequences are relatively known and relatively manageable (I did say relatively). With SARMs, it's all still a guessing game. Would never touch them personally. I've heard people raving about them but they always used them alongside AAS so who knows what they were really raving about?Someone more knowledgeable will chime but honestly I think they're all extremely suppressing, sarms I believe became popular because a lot of guys think if they aren't pushing a needle through they're skin then they aren't using steroids or of course they're just afraid of needles. But for me personally every sarm I've used has had some really nasty physical side effects, much more than using AAS which generally give much better results.
Cardarine and Mk-677 are sold as SARMS but aren't actually. They won't suppress your natural production of Testosterone.
I also do not think they are very suppressive. Not like Deca, tren, etc.I have tried ostarine, lgd & s4. None seemed all that suppressive, imo. It was no comparison to the suppression that I have experienced from oral aas. Didn't get bloods to confirm that. Only what I noticed & felt, based off experience. S4 was definitely legit, as the yellowish tint is super obvious & lgd was actually pretty good for strength & lean gains. I would try lgd again. Probably not the other 2.
I also do not think they are very suppressive. Not like Deca, tren, etc.
I conceived a child on 70mg test weekly + 35mg ostarine daily + HCG. its all I ran for 2 years (not 2 years straight on the ostarine but on/off time on:time off on it). I was actually on ostarine when I knocked my girlfriend up.
Cardarine