I had a bunch of pubmed articles saved somewhere but krill is better than fishoil.
With lower dosages you can get better results but the problem is that fish oil is WAAAY cheaper than krill so at the moment would it be truly worth it to take it? That question can only be answered by how thick your wallet is.
google stuff like krill oil vs. fishoil pubmed...then a lot of stuff should come up. I google stuff and at the end I type pubmed and it pulls pubmed studies and is easier than doing the search in pubmed's search function
They claim its 50 or so times better absorption than fish oil.. but that's in water.. not your body, so it's not an accurate claim... same as creatine hcl having better absorption than mono.. sure in a glass of water.. but doesn't matter once in your body..
just look for high epa/dha..
the antioxidant claims from krill come from the astaxanathin they add in..
also krill is NOT sustainable like they claim.. better to use fish oil for the environment..
Krill is a phospholipid as opposed to regular fish oil which is just lipid.
The idea is our bodies cells are phospholipid bi-layers so they are more receptive to other phospholipids like krill and will be absorbed aprox~30% better hence lower dosage and smaller pills.
Honestly I still do regular fish oil.