|
||||
|
Economic Vandalism
Refer to this article from The Economist that talks about President Obama's recent tariff on tire imports from China
Barack Obama and free trade: Economic vandalism | The Economist During times of Economic recession, this is one of the LAST things we need. Our government is really screwing us here, folks. With talks of this ridiculous health care plan and now further restricting trade... It seems like we may never get out of this hole. I hate to be the bearer of such bad news, but the combination of ridiculous policies from our government and an overall bad day in the stock market have led me to posting this article
__________________
"For me life is continuously being hungry. The meaning of life is not simply to exist, to survive, but to move ahead, to go up, to achieve, to conquer." - Arnold Schwarzenegger
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
I can quickly sum up my side in a phrase: the theory of comparative advantage. The cost of providing for inefficient industries (this example: the tire industry lacking trade) and jobs is more efficient jobs and a wealthier economy. Given that the variable in question, wages, is a function of productivity, the economy and more specifically WORKERS would see improvement via better jobs if there could be a transition from less efficient industry to more efficient. This is essentially the idea of free trade. By placing regulation and making it harder to trade, the industry becomes less efficient. The tired industry (since this is the industry we are speaking of) could certainly benefit from the unregulated trade. Both parties would benefit and this would ultimately help the consumer to get a better price on the product as the producers are now more efficient (lowering their opportunity cost in utilization of their resources) which hopefully could drive up the demand and THEN you get your stimulation of the economy. This inefficient industry's opportunity cost is that it now must steal from the economy's scarce resources and JOBS that could be created elsewhere. What does this mean? It makes our weakened economy weaker. Ok ok, I've said my bit. I would love to hear what you think of this matter as it is an interesting one. As a student of the dismal science, I enjoy looking at these issues from a variety of angles. There is no doubt that our economy is in bad shape, but the policies of our government lately generally have economists outraged (trade regulation, minimum wage was a risk as it acts as a price floor, the talks of nationalized health care, etc). **I realized how much rambling this was in alot of terminology. Basically what I'm saying is I feel that by restricting trade we are making our industries less efficient - we will have to use up scarce resources that could have been used elsewhere, and jobs that could have been had elsewhere.**
__________________
"For me life is continuously being hungry. The meaning of life is not simply to exist, to survive, but to move ahead, to go up, to achieve, to conquer." - Arnold Schwarzenegger
Last edited by HeavyHands; 09-20-2009 at 07:53 PM. |
|
||||
|
The United States has moved from being a manufacturing based economy to a service based economy. That is why we have such a huge trade deficit. Outsourcing the manufacturing of US goods to other countries must be stopped, and the only way to do that is through legislation.
|
|
||||
|
Do you know if those numbers exclude products that are manufactured outside of the US, but by US companies? Most of the numbers I found only talked about the number of manufacturing companies based in the US and used their assets. I didn't any differentiation between those companies' US and foreign assets.
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|