A new approach to TB-500... Let's save some $$$

[johnjuanb1]

I just started running my TB-500 the same way as my BPC-157. I inject 250mcg of each into my rotator cuff and the same amount into my rear delt.

I got to thinking that both of these peptide work systemically but you need high doses in the 2- 5 gram range. So, since BPC-157 has worked like a miracle cure at the low dose of 250mcg directly into the wound, why not try TB-500 that same way?

It just makes sense that on a systemic level, to get a good amount going through the body you need higher doses. But, if you inject directly into the injury, a tiny dose will hit it ASAP and there is no need to have a large volume circulating around in your blood stream. I have a good feeling about this protocol.

The reason I'm trying it this way is because when BPC157 came out everyone complained at the high cost. So, I tried low doses localized and it worked like a charm. No more high cost. TB500 gets expensive run at high doses so I'm trying this localized low dose method to save money.

Literature shows that TB-500 is capable of traveling long distances via subcutaneous injection, but at what dose? Why not use a low dose localized? It makes perfect sense to me.

 

[JB52]

Keep us posted, I'm curious about this. What about injecting 2mg directly into the injury, would that provide even better healing than sub Q injections? I've been doing sub Q injections for the past four weeks but just wondering about IM.

 

[johnjuanb1]

Keep us posted, I'm curious about this. What about injecting 2mg directly into the injury, would that provide even better healing than sub Q injections? I've been doing sub Q injections for the past four weeks but just wondering about IM.

I'm thinking low dose is all that is necessary locally because with BPC157 I tried various localized doses and I found 250mcg works as well as 1mg. I'm expecting the same from TB-500. My goal is to get the same results spending less money.

 

[JB52]

I'm thinking low dose is all that is necessary locally because with BPC157 I tried various localized doses and I found 250mcg works as well as 1mg. I'm expecting the same from TB-500. My goal is to get the same results spending less money.

That would be great then. I still plan on finishing up my loading phase of TB-500 before possibly switching to low dose IM (based on your results), so would it be of more benefit to do local injections vs sub Q or no?

 

[Riles]

looking forward to the results, I have had good luck with BPC-157, but would like to try TB-500 if local injections work out

 

[ECB]

So with tb500 are you doing 250mcg in 3 areas 1 or 2 times per day?

Bpc you're doing twice a day?

 

[johnjuanb1]

That would be great then. I still plan on finishing up my loading phase of TB-500 before possibly switching to low dose IM (based on your results), so would it be of more benefit to do local injections vs sub Q or no?

I would imagine both subQ and IM would do the trick. I've been putting it in my rotator cuff IM.

 

[JB52]

I would imagine both subQ and IM would do the trick. I've been putting it in my rotator cuff IM.

Cool. I may try IM some injections just to see.

 

[Dezzy]

Subbed

 

[nothuman]

I'm doing the combo now too so im following

 

[johnjuanb1]

I'm doing the combo now too so im following

So far so good. My delt injury is one of the worst of my bodybuilding career. It's healing slow but sure. I have no doubt in my mind that a doctor would have told me surgery was a must, but I feel slight improvement continually so no doctor for me.

 

[destin]

I got what i believe bicep tendenosis which i think origimates in the delt. Id be interested in your findings

 

[nothuman]

What I don't understand is why did people think TB500 should be sub q and BPC157 next to the injury? Why the difference? Wouldn't people have thought to use both near the injury to begin with? I know TB500 came out first, so maybe that's why

 

[Elvia1023]

This should be good. I would love to try that combo in my back.