Buy Needles And Syringes With No Prescription
M4B Store Banner
intex
Riptropin Store banner
Generation X Bodybuilding Forum
Buy Needles And Syringes With No Prescription
Buy Needles And Syringes With No Prescription
Mysupps Store Banner
IP Gear Store Banner
PM-Ace-Labs
Ganabol Store Banner
Spend $100 and get bonus needles free at sterile syringes
Professional Muscle Store open now
sunrise2
PHARMAHGH1
kinglab
ganabol2
Professional Muscle Store open now
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
azteca
granabolic1
napsgear-210x65
esquel
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
ashp210
UGFREAK-banner-PM
1-SWEDISH-PEPTIDE-CO
YMSApril21065
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
advertise1
tjk
advertise1
advertise1
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store

Test is not test (from another board about esters)

nfernoo

Banned
Joined
Aug 25, 2014
Messages
1,392
Yup you read it right, all the broscience thats pushed around steroid forums about test being test and ester only effects the half-life of the drug is bullshit. And dont worry i have my citations to back up these bold but true claims. Ive been getting alot of PMs to get more info on the subject as I been dropping hints around the forums on my new thoughts and findings so i figured its best to make a post so everyone can read this. So were gonna talk about esters. This is something ive been researching about for the last 2 months or so after using different esters of drugs and noticing different effects both positive and negative. The common belief among the huge majorly of us is that “Testosterone is Testosterone”, the ester just effects the half life. Well after much research ive found that this is just not the case. Different esters will greatly influence many different aspects of the drugs actions including

1) Conversion to estrogen
2) Nitrogen retention/anabolic nature
3) Peak plasma levels of the drug
4) How suppressive the drug is
5) And a few other things

How esters work

Im sure most of you understand what an ester is but heres a little bit more indepth explination. Steroids are 4 ring structures with 19 carbon atoms. Heres a picture of what the molecule looks likehttps://img.springerimages.com/Images/SpringerBooks/BSE=0164/BOK=978-3-540-79088-4/CHP=7_10.1007-978-3-540-79088-4_7/MediaObjects/WATER_978-3-540-79088-4_7_Fig1_HTML.jpg

So as we all know test no ester is in and out of the system very quickly, so scientists decided to add a side chain or “ester” to extended the active life of the steroid so injection frequencies could be cut down. So if you look at the picture above you will see how the molecule is numbered. Notice the OH or hydroxyl group at the 17th position? Thats necessary for the steroid to bind to the androgen receptor, so this is where they add the ester. So with this side chain blocking the 17th beta position the steroid is temporally inactive. But as soon as it gets into the blood stream, esterase enzymes come and hydrolyze the ester, or in other words remove the ester which restores the hydroxyl group making the steroid active. And lastly, the longer the ester the less water soluble it is and more fat soluble. Something that is more fat soluble is going to take longer be released from the deposit or “depot” the injection creates.

Long esters are more anabolic and will cause more muscle gain

So now that you know how esters work we can talk about their actions and how “test is not test”
First will talk about how longer esters are more anabolic and will cause more muscle gain then shorter esters. In 1954 a scientist named Reifstein and his team did a study comparing Testosterone Enathate with Testosterone Propionate. The results of these studys were that Test e resulted in total nitrogen retention of 1.76g/day vs prop only 1.02g/day. And obviously they found the duration of anabolic activity was 33 days with test e and 12 days with prop.(1) These were with the same doses 200mgs of each. So overall the longer ester retains more nitrogen (muscle gain) per day then shorts and remains active in the body for much longer. So its doesn’t take a rocket scientist to know that if something causes higher levels of nitrogen retention, and hangs around in your body longer its going to be more anabolic. And real life experience tells us the same. Think of a prop kicker, of 150mgs eod, or just a prop cycle. Ive done 6 week kickers while waiting for 500mgs ew of test e to kick in and the results of the prop are not even close to the same as the long esters, despite the same dosage AND 150mgs of prop eod (525mgs ew) actually contains more pure test then 500mgs of test e.

plasma levels and suppression and Estrogen

Scientists did a study on 3 different testosterone esters, short, medium and long esters. And what they found was the short esters caused the greatest peak plasma levels of testosterone, next highest was the medium and lowest peak was the last. But they found that the long esters caused the greatest suppression on the gonadal axis and metabolic functions.(2) They even upped the short ester dose by 2-3 times and were still not able to replicate the suppression and metabolic effects of the long esters. And this greater suppression is also due to the fact that longer esters convert more readily to estrogen, which is what I’m going to get to next.

Im sure alot of you have noticed bloat is greater with long esters. Despite the fact the same people say test is test we dont typically use shorts for bulks and longs for cuts. We use shorts for cuts and contest preps because they dont convert to estrogen to the same degree as longs do, in turn causing less water retention. So going back to the study (2) estradiol levels were much higher with the group using long esters despite identical doses of the drug. So in short, long esters cause a higher rise in estrogen. The study with the 3 different testosterone esters was done over a 28 week period. The shortest esters allowed for the quickest return of natural levels of hormones. Sperm count also remained the highest with the short esters. So concluding that short esters are less suppressive then long esters. Part of the reason why long esters are so much more suppressive is due to the rise in estrogen they cause. Im not gonna explain the negative feedback system of the hpta here in depth but basically the STOP mechanism of the hpta telling it not the produce anymore testosterone is estrogen. it binds in the hypothalamus which tells it not to produce anymore testosterone as the estrogen levels reflect adaquate levels of testosterone.

Estrogen and IGF-1 and GH

So I’m sure many of you know that using testosterone increases GH and igf-1 levels to a degree. But did you know that the increase in these hormones are due on estrogen aromatization? (3)(4) So now going back we know that long esters cause greater increases in estrogen, and estrogen increase GH and igf-1. So using long esters will result in greater muscle gain due to the factors I presented earlier and also the increase in gh and igf-1 levels caused by the greater levels of estrogen long esters cause.

So what about steroids other then Testosterone?

So now ive talked about how esters effect the effects of testosterone, is it the same for all steroids with esters? Well ive found some medical studies done on the different nandrolone esters. These studies had the exact same findings as the testosterone esters. NPP had greater peak plasma levels, suppression was greater with the long estered nandrolone (deca), and the anabolic effect was greater with the long ester (deca). And most of us who have ran both Deca and NPP can say NPP causes less water retention. And the people ive talked to still say Deca is superior for muscle gain. Its been many years since ive used deca so i cant say myself. Ive been using npp the last few cycles but next winter ill be using deca so ill be able to give an accurate comparison.

Summary
Longer esters cause higher levels of estrogen
Longer esters cause more water retention
Longer esters cause more suppression of the HPTA
Longer esters cause higher levels of nitrogen retention (muscle gain)in other words are more anabolic
Shorter esters cause higher peak plasma levels

So I still need to do some more research on how this applies to other esterfied steroids. But from the short amount of reading I did do it seems this applys to steroids that can aromatize, and can convert to DHT. So the only ones that dont apply to this is trenbolone as it doesn’t convert to DHT or estrogen, an masteron as its already a DHT. But further research is needed.

So in short, with diet in check and your goal is to gain the most amount of pure muscle, use long esters for bulking. Although I am intrigued about possibly mixing nandrolone esters next bulk. Yes the deconate will results in more nitrogen retention and muscle, but the npp reaches greater peak plasma levels, so there could be some benefit of using them together, some type of synergy. Much like how guys who like sust swear its the best form of test. And thats my next bulking cycle, sust and deca (possibly with npp also). Gonnna see the benefits of mixing esters.

Reifenstein, et. al. Studies comparing the effects of certain testosterone esters in man.J Am Geriatr Soc. 1954 May;2(5):293-8.. PMID: 13162731

Journal of Andrology, Vol. 24, No. 5, September/October 2003 Copyright © American Society of Andrology Pharmacokinetics and Degree of Aromatization Rather Than Total Dose of Different Preparations Determine the Effects of Testosterone: A Nonhuman Primate Study in Macaca fascicularisGERHARD F. WEINBAUER*, CARL-JOACHIM PARTSCH, MICHAEL ZITZMANN, STEFAN SCHLATT AND EBERHARD NIESCHLAG

[Veldhuis JD, Metzger DL, Martha Jr PM, Mauras N, Kerrigan JR, Keenan B, Rogol AD, Pincus SM 1997 Estrogen and testosterone, but not a nonaromatizable androgen, direct network integration of the hypothalamo-somatotrope (growth hormone)-insulin-like growth factor I axis in the human: evidence from pubertal pathophysiology and sex-steroid hormone replacement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:3414–3420

Keenan BS, Richards GE, Ponder SW, Dallas JS, Nagamani M, Smith ER 1993 Androgen-stimulated pubertal growth: the effects of testosterone and dihydrotestosterone on growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-I in the treatment of short stature and delayed puberty. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 76:996–1001

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Nandrolone Esters in Oil Vehicle: Effects of Ester, Injection Site and Injection VolumeCharles F. Minto, Christopher Howe, Susan Wishart, Ann J. Conway, and David J. HandelsmanJ. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., Apr 1997; 281: 93.

Belkien, L., Schurmeyer, T., Hano, R., Gunnarson, P. O. and Nieschlag, E.: Pharmacokinetics of 19-nortestosterone esters in normal men. J. Steroid Biochem. 5: 623-629, 1985
 
Test is test to me and always will be. Just my opinion.
 
I probably used every test ester possible over the past 25 years and I personally cannot distinguish any differences .i can honestly say I didn't get better results from one particular ester or different side effects either , to me test is test .
 
only thoughts are what a waste of time reading that!!!!

lol


without having the studies there to read all we are left with is the authors interpretation of them which is meaning less at best.

the thought process seems flawed though, of course based on one injection you would expect to see the results of the studies, but in bb we are not doing 1 injection!

simple truths about test:

tne is strongest mg for mg and it also generates more nerve excitation then esterfied test.

some people react better to some esters then others.
example some people don't tolerate prop well, others maybe cyp is not so good, just an individual thing.

you have to play with different esters and see what works well for you.

switch them up every so often. doesn't need to be every 2-3 weeks, that's kind of silly, this is a long term thing. I do notice after using the same test for 1-3 years that switching to a new test makes me "feel"it a lil more. that goes away in time.

the rest is just figuring out how to inject on a regular basis to achieve stable blood levels and minimize side effects.

the rest is just over complicating a pretty simple thing, the people doing it would prob be better served to lift, eat, rest repeat and not stress over the mental masturbation.
 
only thoughts are what a waste of time reading that!!!!

lol


without having the studies there to read all we are left with is the authors interpretation of them which is meaning less at best.

the thought process seems flawed though, of course based on one injection you would expect to see the results of the studies, but in bb we are not doing 1 injection!

simple truths about test:

tne is strongest mg for mg and it also generates more nerve excitation then esterfied test.

some people react better to some esters then others.
example some people don't tolerate prop well, others maybe cyp is not so good, just an individual thing.

you have to play with different esters and see what works well for you.

switch them up every so often. doesn't need to be every 2-3 weeks, that's kind of silly, this is a long term thing. I do notice after using the same test for 1-3 years that switching to a new test makes me "feel"it a lil more. that goes away in time.

the rest is just figuring out how to inject on a regular basis to achieve stable blood levels and minimize side effects.

the rest is just over complicating a pretty simple thing, the people doing it would prob be better served to lift, eat, rest repeat and not stress over the mental masturbation.

Beat me to it lol...

Ty for saving me the time to type it all out tho!

:D
 
Last edited:
I didn't read the article word for word, but from what I saw, he appears to be correct. I wrote a similar article several years ago. In fact, this one looks remarkably similar to mine in terms of content, although less well-written, if I do say so myself :)

Esters directly affect the rate of estrogen conversion, protein synthesis, and peak plasma levels.

The latter is common sense, and different release rates will result in different peak levels of the drug in the bloodstream.

However, fewer people are aware of an ester's abilities to influence estrogen conversion and protein synthesis. Literally every single study since the 1930's onward (there have been dozens of them) have shown that longer esters increase protein synthesis to greater degree than short esters, per mg.

Longer esters also increase the rate of estrogen conversion, which is why they tend to result in more water retention. In theory, this increased rate of estrogen conversion could also result in a greater degree of HPTA suppression, as estrogen itself is suppressive of testosterone production.

However, whether or not short esters increase peak plasma levels (blood levels) to a greater degree than longer esters will depend on both the frequency and number of injections administered. In only one injection is administered, shorter esters will result in higher blood levels due to their more rapid release rate, but this faster release rate is an disadvantage when comparing blood levels after multiple injections have been administered.

When longer esters are injected at an equivalent dosage over several weeks, their delayed release rate will allow blood levels of the drug to accumulate--or "build" on each other--culminating in a higher peak blood level. In contrast, short esters will clear the system within a few days to a week, so blood levels will never rise higher than they do within the first week. Very little "building" takes place. With a long ester like test undecanoate taking up to 6 weeks to fully release into the bloodstream, as many as 6 weeks of injections can build in the system at once, resulting in super high blood levels by the 6 week mark.

What I find odd is the large number of people still claiming that esters have no effect on the activity of a steroid. Now, if all these esters provided visually identical effects, I could understand why someone might think this, but how can someone deny that esters have no effect on the body when we have visual "proof" right in front of our eyes? Obviously, if we get a different effect when attaching a different ester to the same drug, common sense tells us that the ester has something to do with it. As noted above, clinical evidence is also available, in which the different testosterone esters have been demonstrated to increase protein synthesis to different degrees.
 
Last edited:
I thought this was already known? This isn't really a debate imo at all.

Basically test is test. But esters make up the differences. Of course there will be a difference between enanthate and TNE/Base. I don't know the exact numbers but if you pin 100mg of TNE then you'll probably have to hit over a gram of enanthate a week total to reach the same plasma levels as that 100mg shot of TNE gives you.

That's why TNE is awesome. But then again. It gets old pinning yourself that much. Eventually you'll wanna stop. That's where enanthate comes in. You also have to consider the amount of solvents your body is getting from the TNE compared to the enanthate pins. Gotta take a break.

TNE is one of the greatest things ever though.
 
Mike, so what if you're taking an anti e?
And what if you're doing test prop every day?

I'm debating on

1400 test prop per week (every day inject 200mg)
Or
1400 test p/test e mix ( the blend is 100mg test prop and 100mg test e per ml)

The more muscle things sounds great lol.
 
I thought this was already known? This isn't really a debate imo at all.

Basically test is test. But esters make up the differences. Of course there will be a difference between enanthate and TNE/Base. I don't know the exact numbers but if you pin 100mg of TNE then you'll probably have to hit over a gram of enanthate a week total to reach the same plasma levels as that 100mg shot of TNE gives you.

That's why TNE is awesome. But then again. It gets old pinning yourself that much. Eventually you'll wanna stop. That's where enanthate comes in. You also have to consider the amount of solvents your body is getting from the TNE compared to the enanthate pins. Gotta take a break.

TNE is one of the greatest things ever though.

did u run tne as your base or did u add it along side another test ester? how often were you pinning? water or oil?

thx!
 
I'm honestly a little disappointed reading these replies...this board used to be THE board for awesome discussion about anything new or different ways to look at stuff.


Now we get a bunch of "didn't read, test is test bro" dog shit. Is this still Pro Muscle? I found this interesting as hell.
 
Agreed! Very interesting. And I can say from 12 years of use that different test esters effect me in a noticeable way. I would never try and bulk on test prop. Especially.
 
I didn't read the article word for word, but from what I saw, he appears to be correct. I wrote a similar article several years ago. In fact, this one looks remarkably similar to mine in terms of content, although less well-written, if I do say so myself :)



Esters directly affect the rate of estrogen conversion, protein synthesis, and peak plasma levels.



The latter is common sense, and different release rates will result in different peak levels of the drug in the bloodstream.



However, fewer people are aware of an ester's abilities to influence estrogen conversion and protein synthesis. Literally every single study since the 1930's onward (there have been dozens of them) have shown that longer esters increase protein synthesis to greater degree than short esters, per mg.



Longer esters also increase the rate of estrogen conversion, which is why they tend to result in more water retention. In theory, this increased rate of estrogen conversion could also result in a greater degree of HPTA suppression, as estrogen itself is suppressive of testosterone production.



However, whether or not short esters increase peak plasma levels (blood levels) to a greater degree than longer esters will depend on both the frequency and number of injections administered. In only one injection is administered, shorter esters will result in higher blood levels due to their more rapid release rate, but this faster release rate is an disadvantage when comparing blood levels after multiple injections have been administered.



When longer esters are injected at an equivalent dosage over several weeks, their delayed release rate will allow blood levels of the drug to accumulate--or "build" on each other--culminating in a higher peak blood level. In contrast, short esters will clear the system within a few days to a week, so blood levels will never rise higher than they do within the first week. Very little "building" takes place. With a long ester like test undecanoate taking up to 6 weeks to fully release into the bloodstream, as many as 6 weeks of injections can build in the system at once, resulting in super high blood levels by the 6 week mark.



What I find odd is the large number of people still claiming that esters have no effect on the activity of a steroid. Now, if all these esters provided visually identical effects, I could understand why someone might think this, but how can someone deny that esters have no effect on the body when we have visual "proof" right in front of our eyes? Obviously, if we get a different effect when attaching a different ester to the same drug, common sense tells us that the ester has something to do with it. As noted above, clinical evidence is also available, in which the different testosterone esters have been demonstrated to increase protein synthesis to different degrees.


What's your opinions of using test undecanoate to blast with then?
 
I'm honestly a little disappointed reading these replies...this board used to be THE board for awesome discussion about anything new or different ways to look at stuff.


Now we get a bunch of "didn't read, test is test bro" dog shit. Is this still Pro Muscle? I found this interesting as hell.

/\/\/\/\/\ This!
 
TNE def gives me more energy/stimulation than any other ester, also notice water retention moreso than say prop. I'm thinking because there is no ester to cleave, therefore more test, and because it is so quickly available, the estrogen conversion/water retention is more noticeable. I do love it.

Strange there is such a difference between suspension and prop for me. I don't seem to notice nearly as many results from prop, even at higher doses. I def need a good anti-e running susp/tne at 50mg day, but basically none with prop, even at 150 mg day.
 
My apologies if I am wrong, but didn't Brad say that deca was superior to npp for mass gain, in a thread on npp/deca?

One more thing.. The topic of people using more aas these days comes up constantly. I don't remember all this short ester stuff in the 90s, other than tren from pelets. Not saying that they weren't around, but it seems like they were much less.
 
Last edited:

Forum statistics

Total page views
559,149,637
Threads
136,036
Messages
2,776,991
Members
160,422
Latest member
systemfiles1
NapsGear
HGH Power Store email banner
your-raws
Prowrist straps store banner
infinity
FLASHING-BOTTOM-BANNER-210x131
raws
Savage Labs Store email
Syntherol Site Enhancing Oil Synthol
aqpharma
YMSApril210131
hulabs
ezgif-com-resize-2-1
MA Research Chem store banner
MA Supps Store Banner
volartek
Keytech banner
musclechem
Godbullraw-bottom-banner
Injection Instructions for beginners
Knight Labs store email banner
3
ashp131
YMS-210x131-V02
Back
Top