I know this is a bit off topic but might be interesting . . .
It is unfortunate that these posts (nothing against the OP or Mr. Wolf) always seem to take a turn this way; photographs
now-a-days are so heavily scrutinized and called into question, you don’t know what or who to believe. And this is
especially sad when the people we compare themselves or even ourselves against, are something less than real.
There are few worse mistakes then the close-up inspection of one’s heroes.
Not having seen the cover shot in question, I can’t comment on the particulars but do I agree with ‘thebrick’ (how are ya man?).
Having photographed many very famous people, I question every so called photograph now excepting the ones I take. And even
then when mine are handed off, I lose all creative control, am at the mercy of the marketing folks. Which is not always a bad thing.
Sometimes they can make you, the photographer, and your subject look better than you or they actually are. I have been credited
with taking fotos I don’t recall taking, such is the extent of photo manipulation that occurs now with increasing regularity, or as
thebrick says, always.
The ease of which photographs now can be manipulated is astonishing. What would have been damn near impossible in the era
of film only has now become mere child’s splay, ridiculously easy and ethically questionable in the absence of disclaimers.
I have never been on a bodybuilding photo-shoot but from the photo-shoots I have been on, the video seem pretty accurate
except that most of the shots are sent to a large flat screen monitor that every sits around and oohs and aahs over (and
criticizes) as the shots roll in, instead of looking at the back of a photogs camera. But where the real magic occurs is in post
processing, after the shoot, where the images are ‘managed’ or ‘optimized’ for lack of better words.