Why is there so much bro-science about HCG when legitimate scientific journal or research article after article states otherwise? Specifically, I'm talking about the general consensus that too much HCG will "burn out" the Leydig cells, when studies about male hypogonadism and infertility show the use of massive amounts over multiple months, with no negative sides...only resulting in higher sperm counts, higher test levels and getting a female pregnant. I will attach links when I get on my personal computer. I'm on a phone, currently, and attaching links is not something I want to do right now. Just do a Google search for HCG and HMG for male infertility and hypogonadism. I think we are all a little guilty of perpetuating "common knowledge" which has no true scientific foundation. I had a firm belief that using large amounts of HCG over long periods would ruin you...apparently not.
Sent from my LG-D800 using Tapatalk
Have you had a chance to find those links?
To my knowledge, much of this dosing protocol comes from the clinical experience of Dr. John Crisler, who used to post here as SWALE. Crisler has a forum you can search out on his site (see below).
What he has found in that lower amounts of HCG (<500IU) raise his patients testosterone to the desired (eugonadal) range and testicular volume increases. He notes other clinicians have found this to be the case:
Are ultra high doses of hgh really bad - fallacy of hCG desensitization | All Things Male Forum
The study buck posted supports using ~500IU or less.
If you look at this study:
Liu, P. Y., Wishart, S. M., & Handelsman, D. J. (2002). A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial of recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin on muscle strength and physical function and activity in older men with partial age-related androgen deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 87(7), 3125-3135. doi: 10.1210/jcem.87.7.8630
You can get it here:
**broken link removed**
..You'll see that after HCG at
5000IU (2x / week) DECREASED testis volume significantly and this did NOT recover a month after discontinuing the HCG, even though the depression of LH and FSH had recovered at that time. Of course, that doesn't tell us that the testes were refractory to LH, FSH a/o HCG stimulation at that point ("burnt out"), but what we do see is:
-A reduction in testis size (not an increase) with these doses.
-A reduction that persists even when HCG is discontinued and the stimulatory effects of LH and FSH are back in place.
- ALSO, 1 month after discontinuing the HCG, testosterone levels were back to the (low) baseline.
-AND - I'm just eyeballing here (they don't do a good job with stats in this paper, IMO - It looks as it Testosterone level rise up to a peak at the 1mo. period and then are declining over the next two month... (I wonder if they bottomed out to a lower level than baseline a few months after the study's last measurements.
Anyway, again, not direct evidence of burnout, but it's interesting to me also that the authors of that study don't note that the testis volume did not recover. (I wonder if the subjects did!
)
-S