I have always felt that iv usage of methamphetamine was the safest and cleanest way to use it. Now I don't know if I'm trusting enough to believe that my gh is simply and purely gh. I do run my meth (back in the deezay... mind you, 3.5 years clean almost...) through a filter of some sort....
I say if you are comfy with it, do it, I personally cannot imagine using anything iv. Once I saw that spurt of red, I think it would be hard to not wanna blast some dope. But then again, i do not react in an adverse manner while injecting my oils. When I first began using, my heart would race every time I pushed the plunger in.
I think this is a personal preference and prob depends on what your history may be and what your future could look like as a result. I dont personally think its the best idea, but do as you wish.
If it worked considerably better, it would be hard for me to not do it iv. But I would really like to see a link to an actual, legitimate, scientifically sound website showing these iv studies with various graphs and trinkets and such. Prove your point, do not cut and paste, give the link to the website containing this info.
I am also clean 3+ years and I was wondering if shooting gh iv would give you a head rush.I would be waiting for that rush.I can identify with the racing heart when hold works.
Ok Newbie who the F are you to make a statement like that. What have you contributed here? Read your posts. NOTHING. That is a rude assertation- because of similar names? Post something related to topic and stop diverting your elementary knowledge. That is quite an accusation and will be remembered. METHINKS- funny what are you 12?I am 35. You are a moron and a dick and it has nothing to do with tren. 1rhino and strongrhino, methinks someone is using mutlitple user ID's.
I have always felt that iv usage of methamphetamine was the safest and cleanest way to use it. Now I don't know if I'm trusting enough to believe that my gh is simply and purely gh. I do run my meth (back in the deezay... mind you, 3.5 years clean almost...) through a filter of some sort....
I say if you are comfy with it, do it, I personally cannot imagine using anything iv. Once I saw that spurt of red, I think it would be hard to not wanna blast some dope. But then again, i do not react in an adverse manner while injecting my oils. When I first began using, my heart would race every time I pushed the plunger in.
I think this is a personal preference and prob depends on what your history may be and what your future could look like as a result. I dont personally think its the best idea, but do as you wish.
If it worked considerably better, it would be hard for me to not do it iv. But I would really like to see a link to an actual, legitimate, scientifically sound website showing these iv studies with various graphs and trinkets and such. Prove your point, do not cut and paste, give the link to the website containing this info.
Well it is slightly odd that the only people posting in this thread are both named Rhino, both have identical positions and continue to back each other up, and sure enough one responded and then the other. If you are not the same person it appears you have stumbled upon your internet doppleganger. And I was simply discussing a subject and you came in and started throwing around insults and petty sarcasm so I can't quite understand why you are so shocked that I might possibly respond in a similar matter. And for an IV meth user to take such a highly hypocritical position is just astounding. So shooting meth is safer than IVing GH? Are you serious?
So I am starting over and if you are interested in having a serious discussion, fine, we can start over and I will even issue the first apology for being childish and resorting to name calling. So I have provided exactly what you were asking for in terms of studies so what is your thoughts now?
Well it is slightly odd that the only people posting in this thread are both named Rhino, both have identical positions and continue to back each other up, and sure enough one responded and then the other. If you are not the same person it appears you have stumbled upon your internet doppleganger. And I was simply discussing a subject and you came in and started throwing around insults and petty sarcasm so I can't quite understand why you are so shocked that I might possibly respond in a similar matter. And for an IV meth user to take such a highly hypocritical position is just astounding. So shooting meth is safer than IVing GH? Are you serious?
So I am starting over and if you are interested in having a serious discussion, fine, we can start over and I will even issue the first apology for being childish and resorting to name calling. So I have provided exactly what you were asking for in terms of studies so what is your thoughts now?
SEE WE USE RECOMBINANT HGH THAT INSTRUCTS US TO USE SUBCUTANEOUS- NOT IV
Pharmacokinetics of recombinant human growth hormone administered by cool.click? 2, a new needle-free device, compared with subcutaneous administration using a conventional syringe and needle
USAGE:
When reconstitution, 1ml water for injection should be injected along the bottle wall, then swirl the vial with a gentle rotary motion until the contents are completely dissolved, do not shake violently.
The recommended dosage of Ansomone® for the treatment of children growth failure is 0.1~0.15IU/kg daily subcutaneous administration for 3 months to 3 years. Therapy regimen could be modified according to experienced doctor"s suggestion. The recommended dosage of Ansomone® for the treatment of severe burn is 0.2~0.4IU/kg daily subcutaneous administration for 2 weeks.
**broken link removed**
Q: Where do I inject myself?
A: You can inject it sub-cutaneously (just under the skin) in the stomach area or leg with an 29 - 30 gauge, 1/2 inch, 1cc insulin syringe, or alternatively you can inject it intramuscular, however the results from sub-cutaneous injections are more effective
So correct me if I am wrong here, which I have been before.... but young buck posts back up for his iv argument and the study was sub q? Am I reading this correctly?
If so, ha..... ha ha ha.... ha-fucking-ha. Lol, my goodness.
I swear I'm going to find time to read this study, I have just been so busy with work... but this is classic.
There is some evidence that IV administration of HGH is (a) more bioavailable; and (b) (slightly) more biologically active compared to SC administration. Also, the Laursen et al paper is a human based study.
However, there are some issues with IV usage that should be noted:
(1) Sterility and solution. Since IV introduces the drug directly into the blood-stream there is a much greater need to be sure of sterility and complete solution than there is with SC or IM. SC and IM provide a form of "buffering" which gives the immune system some chance to act before the drug enters the blood stream.
(2) Scar Tissue and Collapsed Veins. Repeated IV injections will eventually produce scar tissue and if you have scar tissue around the cubital vein it will make you look like an IV drug user. I don't have a problem with IV drug users but unfortunately most of society does.
(3) Technique. IV injection is the most difficult form of self-injection to master and learning can contribute to (2).
(4) Sustained Release. The trend in HGH delivery technology is towards sustained release: 1, 2, 3 rather than burst release.
(5) Conditioned Response and Ritual. There is good evidence that a component of drug craving is behaviourally conditioned. Rituals and settings that resemble those associated with IV drug use can trigger and intensify cravings. This means that for those of us that are vulnerable to addiction and have had IV drug habits the act of IV injection (of anything) can trigger cravings for IV drugs that haven't been been experienced for a long time. For someone that has struggled to get clean this is an unneeded temptation.
Personally, I don't think IV injection of HGH is for everyone and it appears there is only a slight benefit in IV over SC. The relative impracticality of IV over SC compared to the marginally higher biological activity doesn't make a very compelling case for IV.
My thoughts are that the results suck. Look at #5 and don't be making accusations- I read some of your previous posts and ya really don't contribute around here much. What are your degrees? I have a Bachelor in Chemistry, A Masters in Exercise Phsiology and a Docorate in Chiropractic so don't belittle me with your petty knowledge. The other Rhino and I are not the same person go back and do a history of posts like I did on you and you will see. Ya want to IV HGH go ahead buddy but that is not what it was intended for. Why dont ya just snort the powder than? Better absorbsion right? You call me a moron and a dick on your post on page 2? And then you insult me by claiming Im using 2 different names? Really intelligent. So to me that discounts anything you have to say until an apology- just cause we don't agree? Sounds like an angry child therefore I will treat you like one.Well it is slightly odd that the only people posting in this thread are both named Rhino, both have identical positions and continue to back each other up, and sure enough one responded and then the other. If you are not the same person it appears you have stumbled upon your internet doppleganger. And I was simply discussing a subject and you came in and started throwing around insults and petty sarcasm so I can't quite understand why you are so shocked that I might possibly respond in a similar matter. And for an IV meth user to take such a highly hypocritical position is just astounding. So shooting meth is safer than IVing GH? Are you serious?
So I am starting over and if you are interested in having a serious discussion, fine, we can start over and I will even issue the first apology for being childish and resorting to name calling. So I have provided exactly what you were asking for in terms of studies so what is your thoughts now?
Its scary to think one air bubble can stop your heart. But it does seem ideal for peptides and gh.