- Joined
- Mar 28, 2012
- Messages
- 101
anyone have feedback or a positive experience with these compounds with shorter esters? I like NPP, which makes nandrolone prop interesting to me. Thanks
You will not find many positive reviews… The PIP is pronounced when the ester gets close to the base hormone on Boldenone. Boldenone being a great hormone with the undecylenate ester attached plus being stable in 400mg/ml why would you want it at 50mg/ml in a super short ester? Especially since it performs better in the body at higher dosages.
Most people would love more access to NPP at 200mg/ml. It’s not common though. Someone selling NP most likely wouldn’t have many takers to do PIP with it as well. NPP at 200mg/ml is awesome!!!!
Cage
The handful of anecdotes about bold ace that I've read were that it was indeed better than EQ. That may simply be due to faster onset of action and/or more mg of drug per 100mg of product. Just speculation on my part though.I've heard about the pain with bold ace but isn't it supposed to be way better than eq? Not sure why anyone would make np when you already have npp.
Negative on Bold Ace . I had it and it was a no go ! Could be just that one but, I’ve been around and this was even blended with normal EQ , worse than the old Thin dhb 100 back in 2018 (old brand not around anymore, PAIN! ). Npp is phenomenal if you like Deca but a faster kick. I mainly like Deca but add Npp or run it on its own (all with test) .anyone have feedback or a positive experience with these compounds with shorter esters? I like NPP, which makes nandrolone prop interesting to me. Thanks
npp reacts very differently from np. both in terms of pain and brewing.npp for the win
possibly in my all time fave 5 roids
Why did you ask for people's experience with them if you clearly have your mind made up?I do not care for long esters, bold ace seems like a better addition than traditional eq. I wonder if at a lower concentration per ml, if the pip would be better to manage.. Nandrolone Propionate seems like an even better option than NPP, may have a place deeper into preps before needing to be pulled out.Just curious, if anyone has experience with it.
my mind wasn't made up.. it was nothing more than a hypothesis on the two...that's why I asked for experienced feedback.. the feedback stated that it's a waste from the pain..Clearly, not worth the trouble.
Short esters are sexy and exciting. Jack
Up blood levels, get
The gains train moving…..Blast your ass off right now.
Long esters not so much. Be like hey in 6 weeks your gonna see gains begin
in this case sexy is only in the imaginations of ppl reading steroid profiles.
i had that same obsession and went at it for years. then tried the other.
in real life its not worth it and not sexy at all.
within 2 week you see results from npp, like big results.
unless you NEED mgs no real reason to bother with deca.
eq you see in 3-4 and really no other bold ester is worth it.
i think this thing of long esters taking more then a month to kick in is similar to steroid profiles in terms of exaggeration.