You are good at research I believe......its easy to find...........you found one on gelatin.
Actually, that was just a wikipedia article. I haven't found any studies in medline such as what you seem be be suggesting exist. I figured since you were asking if someone had read the most recent studies that you had done so yourself.
Do you have citations for such and have you read studies supporting the use of LBA's (or their protein component) clinically?...
Processing......can you ask the processor.....I own a gym, I compete........I think you can find a more qualified person to ask.
Will do.
No. I haven't seen a reason to (this is just me), as of yet. Why....not competing anymore?
No, not at all. I can buy higher quality proteins at a cheaper price and combine them with glycerol and have, what I consider to be a higher quality protein source, in and of itself. (See below.)
Will do.
-What percentage of you protein was from LBA's back then when you won the USA's (and how many grams of protein from LBA's)? What percentage of your current protein intake is from LBA's?... 100% then.......50% now.-
I think you mean here that 100% of your non-food protein was in the form of an LBA supplement back when you prepped to win the USA's(?). Do you recall
what percentage of your total protein intake was from LBA's and what your
total protein intake was during that time?...
Do you know if the LBA's from then (when you won the USA's) are produced in the same way now (e.g., what sells on trueprotein's site?...)? I.e., are the protein sources and methods of hydrolysis / preparation the same?... Are the LBA's from then the same as those of today?...According to DAnte and according to my results yes, most definately.
OK - cool. Sounds like I might not have to check with Dante about processing, etc.
Randy.....I am baffled as to why you would not experiment with these on yourself.....honestly I would think you of all people would be curious after seeing such great real world results...but again, you have no reason to and I accept that answer......to me its just a little odd..........science is about experimenting
Indeed. I my experience, a good experiment is based upon a well-justified hypothesis, which is grounded in the scientific evidence (the current a state of the pertinent literature) preceding the formation of said hypothesis.
I haven't been able to formulate a reason LBA's, a sweetened mixture of glycerol and the protein source of LBA's (which I have thought to this point to be essentially equivalent to gelatin, an incomplete protein) would have a physiological advantage over say mixing a high quality whey protein isolate with glycerol in stimulating a positive protein balance. In other words, as a scientist as well as a consumer, I don't see a strong justification to perform such a study (at least as of yet).
If the only difference is the protein source, I'd rather go for buying a WPI at say $10 for 454 grams (a pound) and mix in glycerol at say $30 / gallon ($40 total) than spend $100 for a gallon of LBA's (with only 160 grams of protein).
A better experiment in my mind might be to evaluate the effect of three supplements against a kind :
***A standard diet for all groups containing a mixture of animal and vegetable proteins as, say 50% of dietary protein.
GROUP 1: Glycerol alone, with food protein mixture (from the same sources as the background diet for all groups) to make up the rest of the diet.
GROUP 2: LBA's to make up the rest of the of dietary protein (50%).
GROUP 3: Glycerol mixed with WPI to match Group 2.
GROUP 4 - PSEUDO-PLACEBO: Glycerol like sweetened substance, with equivalent food protein to that in other group (from the same sources as the background diet for all groups). Essentially Group 1 without the glycerol.
I think there is most certainly a convenience factor associated with LBA's for some folks and they're useful in this regard. Additionally, the notion that many folks have used the LBA's with success creates a placebo effect, which is in and of itself extremely powerful.
-S