- Joined
- Feb 3, 2008
- Messages
- 285
I am actually going to do 28 days of Insuling/DNP as outlined by L.Rea when I get back from vacation good luck bro I hope this cycle helps in everyway it's intended.
Author L. Rea is not very bright and definitely not a good person to take advice from. When he talks about DNP in absolute terms ("it makes the process only about 40% efficient", "it doubles glucose uptake") it makes me cringe. It also makes me think he doesn't understand what he's talking about.I don't want to hijack his thread but it retards the insulin molecule so it will not store in fat cells. It causes more stable blood sugar as to not cause hypoglycemia so easily. I can start a new thread with the chapter in it and get discussion going as I don't know the answers but we have some smart people around here to better educate myself as that is what I'm looking for cuz I'm a newbie as far as dnp/insulin
Maybe he should mention that the insulin independant glucose uptake seen with DNP is due to AMPK activation... the same enzyme that downregulates mTOR and shuts off protein synthesis. DNP will oppose the anabolic effects of insulin. And as we know, insulin will inhibit lipolysis.
I think the best part of Rea's whole article is when he cites the abstract from this study and then totally misinterprets it. He concludes that "DNP aids in inducing an environment of insulin resistance in adipose sites thus decreasing the ability for fat cells to get food." Umm, no, that's not what the study said at all. The whole point of the study was that DNP did NOT induce insulin resistance like glucosamine does, desite the fact that both lower the ATP content in cells. Thus, the insulin resistance seen with glucosamine is not due to ATP depletion, but something else.
He obviously never took a look at the full text, where right in the introduction they say "For study, we employed sodium azide (NaN3) and dinitrophenol (DNP), which affect mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation and subsequently lower cellular ATP content. We failed to induce insulin resistance in 3T3-L1 adipocytes with NaN3 and DNP." It seems Rea might want to be sure about what he's reading before putting it into a book. He said the study found exactly the opposite of what it actually did find. And then he makes recommendations based on it. That's pretty bad. Rea's ability to interpret research appears to be very poor.
In my opinion, you're not only going to get the anabolic properties of insulin and the fat-loss properties of DNP. You're also going to get the anti-lipolytic properties of insulin and the anti-anabolic properties of DNP. I think the combination is completely unsupported at best and stupid at worst.