Buy Needles And Syringes With No Prescription
M4B Store Banner
intex
Riptropin Store banner
Generation X Bodybuilding Forum
Buy Needles And Syringes With No Prescription
Buy Needles And Syringes With No Prescription
Mysupps Store Banner
IP Gear Store Banner
PM-Ace-Labs
Ganabol Store Banner
Spend $100 and get bonus needles free at sterile syringes
Professional Muscle Store open now
sunrise2
PHARMAHGH1
kinglab
ganabol2
Professional Muscle Store open now
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
azteca
granabolic1
napsgear-210x65
esquel
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
ashp210
UGFREAK-banner-PM
1-SWEDISH-PEPTIDE-CO
YMSApril21065
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
advertise1
tjk
advertise1
advertise1
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store

High or low reps for growth

ghostdog128

New member
Registered
Joined
Dec 23, 2005
Messages
281
Hey guys I'm new to this board but I have learned alot here so far. I've been active on other boards but I think I'm going to make this my home from now on.. I found this article on another board and thought it had some good info in it.. hope you guys find it useful.

Strength and Conditioning Journal: Vol. 22, No. 6, pp. 67–69.
Repetitions and Muscle Hypertrophy
Brad Schoenfeld, CSCS

Personal Training Center for Women, Scarsdale, New York
Key Words: repetitions, muscular mass

MANY EXERCISE-RELATED factors influence muscular mass. Among them is repetition range—the amount of repetitions performed
during a set. Unfortunately, this is one of the most misunderstood aspects of training.

Most people realize that the use of a high number of repetitions (in excess of 15 per set) is suboptimal for increasing muscular mass.

The reason for this is simple: during a high-repetition set, the weights used aren't heavy enough to innervate the highest threshold motor units. These motor units control the fast-twitch, type IIB fibers—the ones that have the greatest potential for growth.
Rather, the majority of work is accomplished by slow-twitch type I fibers, which are fatigue resistant but have a limited ability to hypertrophy. Thus, although high-repetition training is an excellent approach for heightening local muscular endurance and improving the quality of muscle tissue, it produces only minimal gains in muscular size.

On the other hand, there is a prevailing misconception that in order to get big, one needs to train like a powerlifter, using extremely heavy weights and low repetitions (less than 5 per set). It is common to witness an aspiring bodybuilder load up the bar and perform sets of squats or bench presses at or near his or her 1-repetition maximum. This approach, however, is contrary to established principles of exercise physiology. For a variety of reasons, a moderate-repetition scheme (approximately 8 to 10 repetitions per set) is the decidedly better choice for achieving optimal gains in muscular mass. First, training in a moderate-repetition range stimulates the activation of a maximum number of muscle fibers. This is because of the size principle of muscle recruitment, which dictates that motor units are innervated in an orderly fashion. Smaller motor units are activated first. As a set becomes more intense, larger motor units are progressively brought into play until all available fibers are recruited. This is the general pattern of recruitment seen during moderate-repetition training, and it allows the full spectrum of fibers to exert force.
Alternatively, because low-repetition training requires an explosive concentric effort, the size principle can be short circuited. There is evidence that in a ballistic lift, synaptic-input systems cause the preferential recruitment of high-threshold motor units while inhibiting lower threshold motor units (15). Accordingly, smaller fibers are bypassed in favor of those with greater force potential. Although small fibers don't have the ultimate growth potential of larger fibers, they do, to a certain extent, contribute to muscle hypertrophy. Therefore, because of a reduced involvement of low-threshold neurons, the potential for muscular development is ultimately diminished.
Second, the secretion of endogenous, anabolic hormones is highest after a moderate-repetition set (8). After a muscle has been subjected to intense stress, these hormones help to instigate the growth process. As a rule, the greater the amount of circulating anabolic hormones, the greater the potential for increases in muscular hypertrophy.

It is theorized that lactic acid plays a central role in exercise-related hormonal excitation (11). Although many people tend think of lactic acid as an impediment to exercise, it is actually a potent anabolic facilitator. Lactic acid is generated as a byproduct of glycolysis, the energy system that is the primary fuel source used during moderate-repetition training. When lactic acid accumulates in large amounts, there is a corresponding surge in anabolic hormone levels. Conversely, because low-repetition training predominantly relies on the short-term phosphocreatine system for energy—not on glycolysis—only a limited amount of lactic acid is produced. Hence, the secretion of endogenous hormones is somewhat blunted.

Testosterone levels, for example, are significantly higher after a 10-repetition set when compared with the case after a 1-repetition maximum (3). Although the exact mechanism is still unclear, lactic acid somehow potentiates the release of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)—a chemical messenger that acts a catalyst in cellular function. cAMP, in turn, promotes the secretion of testosterone, which then directly acts on the muscle cell to stimulate growth (9).
In addition, lactate has a significant impact on growth hormone (GH) secretion. A 10-repetition set has been shown to produce large increases in circulating GH—much greater than in a lower-repetition protocol (6). Moreover, these effects are fairly well sustained; they are seen for more than an hour after the workout (7). And the benefits of this are twofold: not only is GH itself a powerful stimulator of muscular growth, but it also mediates the release of insulin-like growth factor (specifically, IGF-1), perhaps the most potent of all anabolic hormones.

Third, moderate-repetition training augments myofibrilar hydration (14). During training, the veins taking blood out of working muscles collapse. However, the arteries continue to deliver blood into the muscles, creating an increased concentration of intramuscular blood plasma. This causes plasma to seep out of the capillaries and into the interstitial spaces (the area between muscle cells and blood vessels). The buildup of fluid in the interstitial spaces causes an extracellular pressure gradient, which causes a flow of plasma back into the muscle. The net result: blood pools in your muscles, causing the phenomenon commonly referred to as a “pump.”

People tend to think of a pump as a temporary condition that is strictly cosmetic. However, this belief is shortsighted. Numerous studies have demonstrated that a hydrated cell stimulates protein synthesis and inhibits proteolysis (protein breakdown; 4, 10, 13). In this way, muscles are provided with the raw materials to lay down new contractile proteins—the basis for muscle tissue growth. Unfortunately, during low-repetition training, the time under tension simply isn't sufficient to generate a pump. Consequently, cell volume is relatively constant, and the impetus for protein synthesis is thereby reduced.

Fourth, by increasing time under tension, a moderate-repetition set maximizes muscle damage—a fact that has been shown to be imperative to increases in muscular hypertrophy (2). Theoretically, the longer that cross-bridge formation is maintained during training, the greater the potential for damage to the tissue. Because the duration of cross-bridge formation is shorter in a low-repetition set than in a moderate-repetition set, there is less time for myofilamental damage to take place.

It is important to note that these concepts are predicated on the overload principle, which states that a muscle must be taxed beyond its present capacity for growth to occur (5). Hence, all sets (excluding warm-ups) should be performed at a high level of intensity. This is an essential factor for promoting gains in size and strength (1, 12). Clearly, without muscular overload, results will be compromised.

In final analysis, there is substantial evidence that training in a moderate-repetition range is the superior method for building muscular mass. As discussed, it optimizes fiber recruitment, increases hormonal response, enhances cellular hydration, and heightens myofilamental damage. These factors work synergistically, combining to stimulate muscular growth. But does this mean that lower repetitions should never be employed in a mass-building program? Certainly not. Low-repetition sets can help to improve neuromuscular response, which in turn can translate into the ability to use heavier weights. Similarly, some high-repetition sets can also be employed to refine muscular endurance and raise lactate threshold. Still, if mass is your goal, the majority of training should be performed in a glycolytic mode, keeping repetitions between 8 to 10 per set.
 
ghostdog128 said:
In final analysis, there is substantial evidence that training in a moderate-repetition range is the superior method for building muscular mass. As discussed, it optimizes fiber recruitment, increases hormonal response, enhances cellular hydration, and heightens myofilamental damage. These factors work synergistically, combining to stimulate muscular growth. But does this mean that lower repetitions should never be employed in a mass-building program? Certainly not. Low-repetition sets can help to improve neuromuscular response, which in turn can translate into the ability to use heavier weights. Similarly, some high-repetition sets can also be employed to refine muscular endurance and raise lactate threshold. Still, if mass is your goal, the majority of training should be performed in a glycolytic mode, keeping repetitions between 8 to 10 per set.

good article...i usually keep mine between 8-12...no more than 13 and no less than 6
 
wow great post I was thinking of writing the same thing but in a diffrent way because i have tried the heavy weight thing for the last 3 yrs and all in all the results were good but the past month,or so I have been going lighter , higher reps,more sets and it has made a great change in my over all body . Not only i dont have to worrie about sore joints, a spotter to pull the weight off me lol , My pumps are fuller and last longer but hey what do i know I only weight 190 @ 5'6 but the 5 lbs i put on was in a months time off the juice too. The question of the day is how long should i stay with the lighter weight? Ex. flat bench 205 x 15 for 5 sets after 3 sets @135 x 20 ?
 
engbulldog said:
wow great post I was thinking of writing the same thing but in a diffrent way because i have tried the heavy weight thing for the last 3 yrs and all in all the results were good but the past month,or so I have been going lighter , higher reps,more sets and it has made a great change in my over all body . Not only i dont have to worrie about sore joints, a spotter to pull the weight off me lol , My pumps are fuller and last longer but hey what do i know I only weight 190 @ 5'6 but the 5 lbs i put on was in a months time off the juice too. The question of the day is how long should i stay with the lighter weight? Ex. flat bench 205 x 15 for 5 sets after 3 sets @135 x 20 ?

i could relate to this...most of the time i have been training low reps high weight, but ever since i have changed to a higher reps slightly lower weight training i have put on some noticable hypertrophy...i'm also off too..
 
I think its more to do with the TUL than reps. 30 sec or greater is what brings more hypertrophy. If you look at the average guy do a rep its 1-0-1 or 1-0-2 wich is best with a 10-12 rep set. Those doing 4-6 reps are not doing 5-8 sec sets to get the full benefit.
EB i think 15-20 is a little to much but sticking to 8-12 should let you use a good amount of wieght and keep your TUL up.
My advice is to mix reps 10-12 with reps 3-5 and get the best of both.

RC
 
RazorCuts said:
I think its more to do with the TUL than reps. 30 sec or greater is what brings more hypertrophy. If you look at the average guy do a rep its 1-0-1 or 1-0-2 wich is best with a 10-12 rep set. Those doing 4-6 reps are not doing 5-8 sec sets to get the full benefit.
EB i think 15-20 is a little to much but sticking to 8-12 should let you use a good amount of wieght and keep your TUL up.
My advice is to mix reps 10-12 with reps 3-5 and get the best of both.

RC

I agree good article..and as usual RC!! I agree, 8-12 reps, and mix in some low rep work in the cycle..I think cycled workouts are best..start with higer reps and work down to lower reps and higer weight as you progress in the traing cycle be it 8, 10 , 12 weeks... Mix it up..doesnt have to be in a linera fasion either..3 weeks 10-12, 3 weeks 4-6, 3 weeks 8-10..
 
Over the last couple years, I have had trained both ways after years of going just heavy all the time and have found the growth rates to be about the same. I think what is most important is adding weight on a gradual and continual basis is the most important factor. If you start out benching 135 lbs for reps and build it to the point of 315 for the same amount of reps, I think you can safely say you are going to put on some mass. Since I screwed my shoulder in September, I have been concentrating on higher reps with less sets and am still getting good strength gains.

It's all about adding weight to that bar, plain and simple.
 
Leviathan said:
Over the last couple years, I have had trained both ways after years of going just heavy all the time and have found the growth rates to be about the same. I think what is most important is adding weight on a gradual and continual basis is the most important factor. If you start out benching 135 lbs for reps and build it to the point of 315 for the same amount of reps, I think you can safely say you are going to put on some mass. Since I screwed my shoulder in September, I have been concentrating on higher reps with less sets and am still getting good strength gains.

It's all about adding weight to that bar, plain and simple.

You are correct. If you do not add wieght you wont grow no matter what your reps or TUL is. Progression is the key in some form.
Also i think higher reps work for capillary growth and after talking with RC my growth has been greater using a TUL greater than 30 sec no matter what rep range i use. Mix it up and have fun.

MM
 

Staff online

  • K1
    Blue-Eyed Devil
  • LATS
    Moderator / FOUNDING Member / NPC Judge

Forum statistics

Total page views
559,778,517
Threads
136,136
Messages
2,780,692
Members
160,448
Latest member
Jim311
NapsGear
HGH Power Store email banner
your-raws
Prowrist straps store banner
infinity
FLASHING-BOTTOM-BANNER-210x131
raws
Savage Labs Store email
Syntherol Site Enhancing Oil Synthol
aqpharma
YMSApril210131
hulabs
ezgif-com-resize-2-1
MA Research Chem store banner
MA Supps Store Banner
volartek
Keytech banner
musclechem
Godbullraw-bottom-banner
Injection Instructions for beginners
Knight Labs store email banner
3
ashp131
YMS-210x131-V02
Back
Top