CJC-1294 & GHRP-6 Analysis

[papapumpsd]

Can anyone interpret these analytical reports for CJC-1295 & GHRP-6? I have not used these instruments in many years so any help would be appreciated.

The MWs indicate which peptide is which: MW: 3367.97 is CJC-1295 and MW: 873.04 is GHRP-6.

 

[Bobaslaw]

Hey Papa,

3367.97 is tetrasubstituted GRF 1-29, definitely NOT real CJC-1295. (Posted by Dat a while back):

I think I know this source by the the product alias "YR-29-NH2" (I've only seen it named as such from one place), and it was Tsubed GRF when I got to the bottom of it.

CJC-1295 is about 3647.17 **
Lysine + the DAC alone is about 280.29 **
Modified or tetra-substituted GRF(1-29) is about 3366.88 +/- 2
Unmodified GRF(1-29) or Sermorelin is about 3357.9

Take Care.

 

[papapumpsd]

Hey Papa,

3367.97 is tetrasubstituted GRF 1-29, definitely NOT real CJC-1295. (Posted by Dat a while back):



Take Care.

SUNNUVA!!!

Thanks man!

If I recall correctly, the tetrasub. version is best dosed >1x ED since it doesn't hang around actively in the blood as long as CJC-1295.

 

[Bobaslaw]

Personally I would rather have TsubG than CJC. If I had both, I would still run them multiple times a day at approx 100mcg/dose, and TsubG would be cheaper for this, minus the raised troughs.
I'm just not keen on having continuous raised basal troughs for longer periods, and feel there is something to the bodies own natural interpulse down time for optimal signaling pathway resensitization.

 

[papapumpsd]

Personally I would rather have TsubG than CJC. If I had both, I would still run them multiple times a day at approx 100mcg/dose, and TsubG would be cheaper for this, minus the raised troughs.
I'm just not keen on having continuous raised basal troughs for longer periods, and feel there is something to the bodies own natural interpulse down time for optimal signaling pathway resensitization.

I agree 100% ^^^^^

 

[Jarconis]

real cjc is the peptide equivalent of finding bigfoot.

 

[chriswhat]

That looks similar to the report I have on Chavo's "CJC" that ended up being 80% pure GRF 1-29. But there are some things that are different. If you had the protocol of analysis page that would be nice. My mass spec charts look different and have more detail too, but I guess different labs have different ways of presenting data.