getbig27 said:
km2000--im not talking about what ronnie could have looked like im talking about what he has looked like for the past few years.....and that is better than jay any day. if the only way for the judges to put jay ahead of ronnie is when he is lack luster and injured...fine...no one is argueing that point. all im saying is if i've kicked your ass every time you stood next to me despite the huge age difference and now that im ageing you find it possible to get a victory then what have you done? beaten an injured lack luster physique? i guess thats ok if thats how you want to be remembered. BUT.....
if it was me, i would want to be remembered as the guy who won the MR. O and not the guy who pried it from the old hands of the injured ronnie coleman.
well how are we supposed to judge the contest then, how ronnie and jay looked a week out? I dont think jay cares nor dose his bank account how people remember him winnin the 06 mr O. he won thats final! It dosent matter how many times ronnie beat jay he won this time. Yes jay beat ronnie when he had a" injured lack luster physique" in yor words, thats not jays fault ITS RONNIES BRO!
you made the comment
"i dont feel you can say on that one day jay beat ronnie because you cant say you beat someone if they have always kicked your a$$ then one year you show up off and your apponent didnt. that just means, you were off"
that makes no sense what so ever! thats like sayin usc should be in the title game because they are a better team than ucla, although ucla showed up to play and usc didnt and ucla beat usc. it dont matter bro! thats why we play the game and do the comps to see who is better on that day! and jay was better than ronnie the day of the mr O.
bro we all know ronnie 100% cant be beat, but he dosent always show up 100%, and when he dosent, it leaves the door open to someone who does, and he loses that match. maybe he will show up next year and freak us all out, but we dont know untill that 20 min during prejudging he and the others are up there.
not trying to argue with ya, I think I see where your coming from with ronnie being inbeatable at his best, I agree! and if you add the total o wins up ronnie is the man! I just dont see the point in thinkin about the what ifs of the show.