pumbertot said:
Is that 3 x 100mcg shots every 8 hours or one 300mcg? The split shots would work well, but best to add in some modified grf(1-29) for full effect.
If thats a sinlge 300mcg GHRP6, better off with the GH imo.
Btw, hello there Dat my broheim, long time no speak. Or should I say long time no post in same thread.
Pum I missed you very much indeed. I'm happy you remembered me.
MaTrlx said:
Timing is important. If you want fatloss and you take 2iu of GH during the day when insulin is high due to feeding how much fatloss will take place?
2iu of synthetic GH
2iu of GH doesn't get you whole lot of coverage. But guess what?
If you really have the pharmaceutical equivalent of 2iu of GH you will be doubling your natural production (especially if you take the 2iu earlier in the day and/or take steps to reduce GH shutdown of natural GH such as the use of 8+ grams of Arginine, etc) ...
If you are older you may be tripling your current natural level of GH. So no matter when/how you take it if we meet back here 9 months from now you will be able to tell me you see positive changes in your physique from the 2iu of GH a day (especially if you are working w/ Phil).
So when you compare one man's use of 2iu w/ another you need to define what you mean by better, examine the way it was used, duration, age, ability to make proper use of it by doing the 95% of the other stuff to induce anabolism, the insulin resistance of tissue and quality of the GH.
GHRP-6/GHRH
Now lets briefly look at natural release.
As Pum wrote, there is a difference between taking GHRP-6 (which will create a GH pulse for EVERYBODY) by itself and taking it with a GHRH (in the form of modified GRF(1-29) or CJC-1295 NOT Sermorelin!!!!!!)
Taking both GHRP/GHRH means that the GH release will be many multiples higher.
Now that pulse will last about 2 hours and it is over. With 2iu of GH the rise (which looks like a steep hill with small slope toward the bottom of the back side) will approximate 2hrs but will elevate base levels a bit over the following hour or so.
Comparison
So in terms of total amount of GH 2iu will slightly exceed that one time GHRP-6/GHRH pulse if taken during the day.
If taken prebed the GHRP-6/GHRH will produce more GH then the 2iu of synthetic GH.
Now dosing three times a day of GHRP-6/GHRH will obviously produce more GH.
So back to your question SPECIFIC question:
Neither protocol (300mcg GHRP-6 or 2iu GH) is sufficient for real bodybuilding.
If you spread the GHRP-6 over 3 dosings it will elevate systemic IGF-1 levels in some but not all people (but should increase autocrine/paracrine IGF-1 activity in all).
If you dose 2iu GH it pretty much will elevate systemic IGF-1 levels in most (but the autocrine/paracrine activity will not be better & may be worse then the GHRP-6/GHRH).
Why not do both?
My opinion has evolved on whether synthetic GH will shutdown natural GH.
I now strongly suspect that a dose as small as 2iu if administered into a natural rising pulse will not shutdown natural GH production. This has been demonstrated in studies...
...but if you administer any synthetic GH when there is no rising natural pulse you WILL inhibit further natural pulses.
So how to insure you do it right?
Administer 100mcg or GHRP or 100mcg GHRP/GHRH to create a natural pulse. Then 20 minutes later administer 2iu of synthetic GH.
BOOM!!!!! I said BOOOM!!!! You may end up emptying your natural store of GH and add the 2iu of synthetic GH on top.... THAT is a nice pulse.
Three hours later your body will have restored the natural GH stores and be ready to go again...
If you want you can repeat 8 times a day.
Or if all you have is 2iu of synthetic GH do it once and then a couple of other times (especially pre-bed) use 100mcg GHRP-6 by itself.
GHRP-6 is so cheap I have no idea why someone wouldn't add it. Surely adding the GHRP-6 w/ the 2iu of GH will increase those IGF-1 levels higher.
I apologize
...Matrix for not giving you a true of false short answer. But... sigh... apparently I'm not capable ...you should see my how I fill out my driver's license test.
"The answer is C but see the back for my further explanation."