- Joined
- May 14, 2008
- Messages
- 4,905
Again, I'm a dog owner. I love dogs but people keep saying 'poor pit'. The 'poor pit' BIT THE OWNER'S KID after killing the other dog a few days earlier.
Why assume dogs in general can't take into account size and threat level? They aren't stupid, instinct should tell them when a threat is genuine and the level of that threat. Otherwise they would just go around killing the owner if he smacks them, or ripping each other to shreds when there's any kind of conflict. I go to the dog park all the time, there's at least one scuffle every visit and I've never seen an injury worthy of stitches. The problem is when a dog's aggression level too high - if it's incapable of distinguishing a real threat from a 5 lb yapper or a child, for instance. This is then compounded when pits and other large dogs can kill with a single bite. If a dog like that can't make the right determination and just goes into kill mode in the wrong scenario, it's not only a liability but also it's just fucked up morally when owners can't acknowledge it.
I answered this already. But to be more clear. A dog will distinguish between its family and an outsider. Just because a dog killed another dog does not mean the family is in danger. If a dog is biting family members than it clearly wasn't trained/supervised properly. Still a sad story for the dog, because the owner should have known what to prevent it.
All dogs are domesticate wolves. All have been breed to have diffrent ability and physical attributes pleasing to human.
in a dogs mind, all other dogs are around 75lbs have very thick skin. And mean what they say (in their body language) he doesn't know the dog threating him has paper thin skin and easily killed
Last edited: