- Joined
- Feb 17, 2015
- Messages
- 4,301
Hi, I would like to know the opinion of experienced people, preferably deceptions about offseason cycles in which anabolics are higher than the test. Less testosterone = less aromatization, so we can use less IA. How about such a cycle (doses are exemplary but I am a super-heavy bodybuilder weighing about 290 in stage form)
EQ (as base) 1500-1750mg week
sustanon 750-1000mg week
npp or primo 1000mg week
to this GH, insulin, IA but I am skipping this issue I mean the idea of using AAS
I have always been a supporter of high test cycles (2g +) and lower anabolics but when your offseason weight starts to reach 315 pounds and more an additional 10-15 pounds of water retention from a high test starts to be very uncomfortable and not to mention everyday life but it hinders even workouts through, for example, cumbersome back pumps, that's why I'm thinking about trying a different approach. Jordan Peters is also testing a bit similar and it bases its growth cycles on very high nandrolone drugs due to similar reasons I have described.
EQ (as base) 1500-1750mg week
sustanon 750-1000mg week
npp or primo 1000mg week
to this GH, insulin, IA but I am skipping this issue I mean the idea of using AAS
I have always been a supporter of high test cycles (2g +) and lower anabolics but when your offseason weight starts to reach 315 pounds and more an additional 10-15 pounds of water retention from a high test starts to be very uncomfortable and not to mention everyday life but it hinders even workouts through, for example, cumbersome back pumps, that's why I'm thinking about trying a different approach. Jordan Peters is also testing a bit similar and it bases its growth cycles on very high nandrolone drugs due to similar reasons I have described.