• All new members please introduce your self here and welcome to the board:
    http://www.professionalmuscle.com/forums/showthread.php?t=259
Buy Needles And Syringes With No Prescription
M4B Store Banner
intex
Riptropin Store banner
Generation X Bodybuilding Forum
Buy Needles And Syringes With No Prescription
Buy Needles And Syringes With No Prescription
Mysupps Store Banner
IP Gear Store Banner
PM-Ace-Labs
Ganabol Store Banner
Spend $100 and get bonus needles free at sterile syringes
Professional Muscle Store open now
sunrise2
PHARMAHGH1
kinglab
ganabol2
Professional Muscle Store open now
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
boslabs1
granabolic1
napsgear-210x65
monster210x65
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
DeFiant
UGFREAK-banner-PM
STADAPM
yms-GIF-210x65-SB
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
wuhan2
dpharma
marathon
zzsttmy
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
azteca
crewguru
advertise1x
advertise1x
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store

ACSM Now Endorses Simple Training Programs for Experienced Trainees

RazorCuts

New member
Registered
Joined
Oct 20, 2005
Messages
816
ACSM Now Endorses Simple Training Programs for Experienced Trainees

In a shift from its prior position stand statement about progressive resistance training for experienced trainees1, the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) in its 7th edition of its Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription2, now endorses much simpler training programs as effective for both beginners and experienced trainees.
A majority of the recommendations from the Guidelines book were presented at the recent ACSM national convention without disagreement.

Here are some of the points and recommendations from the new guidelines that you can effectively use for your own training.
Perceived effort is a good measure of intensity. Rather than focusing on protocols that use different percentages of 1 RM, focus on perceived effort. Using different percentages of 1 RM is not a good way to prescribe exercise programs. This is because across individuals, and different muscle groups, and different exercises, the same percentage of a 1 RM can yield a different number of repetitions. Such differences can exist within an individual. This means that for some people and for any exercise an individual performs, the prescription can be too hard or too easy, rendering it ineffective.
Different repetitions and resistance can yield the same degree of effort when the maximum repetitions are performed in a set. This means that a wide range of repetitions for a set can be equally effective. For example, a very high degree of effort and intensity can be reached in a set where you perform six repetitions in good form with a heavy resistance and ‘fail’ on an attempt at a seventh repetition or where you perform 12 repetitions with a more moderate weight and ‘fail’ on an attempt at a 13th repetition. In either case, the maximum recruitment of muscle fiber motor units would have occurred. You can choose to train with any number of repetitions with an effective set taking between about 30 seconds and 90 seconds.
There is no evidence that there is a separate way to train for strength or endurance. As you become stronger, you will increase your absolute muscular endurance. For example, if through training, you increase your strength in a movement from 60 lbs to 85 lbs, you may increase the number of repetitions you can perform with 40 lbs from 12 to 20. No special training is required to increase endurance. For each person and for each exercise and muscle group, relative muscular endurance is stable and appears genetically based. For example, a beginner’s 1 RM on an exercise may be 100 lbs and the trainee can perform 8 repetitions with 80 lbs (80%). Two years later, the trainee can do a 1 RM with 200 lbs and perform 8 repetitions with 160 lbs (80%). Relative endurance using a percent of 1 RM hasn’t changed and evidence indicates that it will not change. Protocols assuming that the relationship can be changed are not based on scientific research.
Based on raising a resistance in about 3 seconds and lowering the resistance in 3 seconds, performing several to 15 repetitions can be effectively used. If longer duration repetitions are performed such as using a 5, 5 (10 seconds for 1 repetition) then several to 8 to 10 repetitions can be used.
Increasing bone mineral density may depend upon using somewhat lower repetitions such as 6-8 and therefore training with somewhat greater resistance. A variety of exercises can be used because the effect of resistance training on bone mineral density is site specific.
To increase strength, training has to produce an overload beyond a minimal threshold. Maximum effort produces maximum intensity and the greatest stimulus but the maximum stimulus may not produce any greater adaptation than a somewhat submaximal effort if there is some marginal overload. This means you should focus on progression while using great form and not an absolute maximum effort where form may be compromised.
Train through as complete a range of motion that is comfortable for you.
Assuming all the other variables are kept constant, the intensity of training can be increased by increasing the weight, number of repetitions, and by reducing momentum through increasing the repetition’s duration. Muscular tension for an exercise may be maintained and intensity increased by not ‘locking-out’ on multiple joint exercises such as squats and bench press.
There is no evidence that any one exercise is better than any other exercise for a specific muscle group. There is no evidence that performing an exercise a specific way such as on a stability ball produces better outcomes for strength or endurance than if the exercise is performed in another way. The exercises are simply different.
A variety of exercises can be used for each muscle group and can perhaps provide some physiological and psychological benefits beyond consistently performing the same exercise for a muscle group. However, a variety of exercises for each muscle group need not be performed in one training session but rather across training sessions.
While a few researchers have shown better outcomes for strength and muscular hypertrophy with multiple set protocols, the overall evidence does not support the performance of multiple sets of each exercise or higher volume training.
A guideline is to take about 3 seconds to raise the resistance and about 3 seconds to lower the resistance using a full range of motion for each repetition. Longer duration repetitions may decrease momentum and increase intensity.
There is not any consistent evidence that the stimulus (repetition performance, number, duration, volume of training) for experienced trainees needs to be different than for beginning trainees. Therefore, there is little or no basis for special ‘advanced’ routines promoted by some organizations, websites, and magazines.
A program for any trainee can consist of eight to 10 exercises performed two to three days per week. Different exercises for each muscle group could be varied across workouts. For example, a squat can be used for the thighs in the first workout in a week and the leg press can be used in the second workout.
One set per exercise performed to volitional fatigue can be used with 5-6 to 15 repetitions in a set if a 3,3 duration repetition duration is employed.
Training should be on two or three nonconsecutive days in the week.

Rather than the time consuming and complex guidelines and protocols that were recommended from the ACSM’s prior position stand1 and other organizations, the current state of the science recommends a far more efficient approach to training. Efficient and simpler training programs also are likely to result in greater adherence and more consistent training. In that way, the new guidelines should also produce better outcomes.

More details about these guidelines and simple training routines based on these guidelines will be in the August Master Trainer. Here is one starting point. An effective routine can consist of a compound and isolation movement for one set each for larger muscle groups and one exercise for one set for smaller muscle groups.

References

American College of Sports Medicine. Position Stand: Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2002; 34: 364-80.
ACSM. (2005). ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription (7th ed.). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins
 
Good read
 
Great article, it really backs up everything Big A preaches about training.


MM
 
Shows once again how bodybuilding stays ahead of science.
 
It says its up to you. Full body or a split. It really doesnt matter.

Fullbody 2x a week, Upper/Lower split(MT-TF) or a 3 way split M-W-F (Muscle group once a week).

MM
 
BigBoyJ said:
Shows once again how bodybuilding stays ahead of science.

How is that ? In science experiments on weight training they general don't overuse steroids you know :D
 
Moen said:
How is that ? In science experiments on weight training they general don't overuse steroids you know :D


Steroids? What are you talking about? People here use steroids? If that's the case then let me tell you about an afterschool special I saw. I found out that steroids will kill you almost instantly as soon as you shoot them in your veins. The belly button, or the left testicle is a better place to shoot. I don't recommend them, but if you insist on using them, be prepared to beat up your girlfriend and start stealing from your parents....it's inevitable. Steroids also lead to crack use, you don't want to be hooked on the crack do you? I'm here to help you guys, don't let yourselves die of the brain tumors.
 
Will be insteresting to see

what kind of Strenght records will be broken
in light of these new findings.
 
BigBoyJ said:
Steroids? What are you talking about? People here use steroids? If that's the case then let me tell you about an afterschool special I saw. I found out that steroids will kill you almost instantly as soon as you shoot them in your veins. The belly button, or the left testicle is a better place to shoot. I don't recommend them, but if you insist on using them, be prepared to beat up your girlfriend and start stealing from your parents....it's inevitable. Steroids also lead to crack use, you don't want to be hooked on the crack do you? I'm here to help you guys, don't let yourselves die of the brain tumors.

So what you basically said before is that the average bodybuilder with the intellect of a sewer pipe knows more about training than scientist studying it do ? (even though these scientist arent putting their test subjects on steroids either)
 
Moen said:
So what you basically said before is that the average bodybuilder with the intellect of a sewer pipe knows more about training than scientist studying it do ? (even though these scientist arent putting their test subjects on steroids either)

What I'm saying is that many bodybuilders have been saying for years what this study is just finding out. It's been known for a long time that advanced bodybuilders stay well ahead of the scientific community in terms of training methods, supplementation and yes, steroid use.

And to be on a BODYBUILDING message board saying that a bodybuilder has the intelligence of a sewer pipe is pretty fuckin' stupid....especially when you're named after a faucet yourself.
 
Last edited:
You can hardly say the average bodybuilder is broad minded etc
I'm not generalising and I hope you see that but a high percentage of the bodybuilders are just plain meatheads so I doubt they will stay 'ahead of science'
 
Moen said:
You can hardly say the average bodybuilder is broad minded etc
I'm not generalising and I hope you see that but a high percentage of the bodybuilders are just plain meatheads so I doubt they will stay 'ahead of science'

Notice I said "advanced bodybuilders". I'm not talking your average dipshit who hangs out in the gym doing bench press and curls. I'm talking the guys who've done their research and learned through trial and error what works when it comes to nutrition, supplementation, training and steroids. And yes, the bodybuilders are ahead of science in these aspects. Hell, I know I've been training almost the exact way that this study says for almost ten years.
 
Studies are showning Arthur Jones was right. Metzner was right in the beginning but took things to far. Now Ellington Darden is taking over were Arthur left off as is Richard Winnet and Clarece Bass. Even bodybuilder Lee Apperson swears by it.
I have seen more people gain more muscle training fullbody 2x a week 1 set than anyother system.
Jones was light years ahead of himself.

RC
 
BigBoyJ said:
Notice I said "advanced bodybuilders". I'm not talking your average dipshit who hangs out in the gym doing bench press and curls. I'm talking the guys who've done their research and learned through trial and error what works when it comes to nutrition, supplementation, training and steroids. And yes, the bodybuilders are ahead of science in these aspects. Hell, I know I've been training almost the exact way that this study says for almost ten years.

Well since I meant the average bodybuilder, I obviously was not talking about people here alone. This board is definately the most thinking man's bb board there is. And yes, Arthur Jones rules :D
 
Moen good to see a guy who cuts through the Bull**** that is out there.
People do not want to admit that training and diet are very simple yet made complicated.
Have you ever visited the Master Trainer site? Thinks just like us.

http://www.ageless-athletes.com/

Check it out you will love the articles. He also publishes a no nonsense mag.

RC
 
Cool thx
 

Staff online

  • rAJJIN
    Moderator / FOUNDING Member

Forum statistics

Total page views
576,122,665
Threads
138,449
Messages
2,857,138
Members
161,444
Latest member
asd222
NapsGear
HGH Power Store email banner
yourdailyvitamins
Prowrist straps store banner
yourrawmaterials
3
raws
Savage Labs Store email
Syntherol Site Enhancing Oil Synthol
aqpharma
yms-GIF-210x131-Banne-B
hulabs
ezgif-com-resize-2-1
MA Research Chem store banner
MA Supps Store Banner
volartek
Keytech banner
thc
Godbullraw-bottom-banner
Injection Instructions for beginners
YMS-210x131-V02
Back
Top