- Joined
- Nov 1, 2007
- Messages
- 2,165
Lets face it folks...
What we think is a winning figure physique and what the judges see are two different things...
Even amongst judges the definition of a winning physique is still not truly defined...
The choice is this.... should girls compete to win? or compete to look awesome and let the cards land were they land..?
Time and time again, especially at the pro level..... the most conditioned and athletic looking girl is not the winner...
Its really sad too because some girls come in hard and lean and dont place that great.. then they soften up and then they are considered to smooth..
Finding the winning combination is not easy...
My pick for one of the best overall looks is Alicia Harris whom placed 6th at the Cal.. She looked much softer at the olympia and placed 13th..
What we think is a winning figure physique and what the judges see are two different things...
Even amongst judges the definition of a winning physique is still not truly defined...
The choice is this.... should girls compete to win? or compete to look awesome and let the cards land were they land..?
Time and time again, especially at the pro level..... the most conditioned and athletic looking girl is not the winner...
Its really sad too because some girls come in hard and lean and dont place that great.. then they soften up and then they are considered to smooth..
Finding the winning combination is not easy...
My pick for one of the best overall looks is Alicia Harris whom placed 6th at the Cal.. She looked much softer at the olympia and placed 13th..