- Joined
- Jun 5, 2002
- Messages
- 67
Hey bro, I have a decently long winded question, Meaning no disrespect, I would preffer more experienced bros, like the pros, Mr magoo, xcell, and anybody who has juiced for a decnt matter of time. I myself am a cherry in this game, with 1 year of gear under my belt. Now
I recently read and article, in muscular developement, By the author, of chemical muscle enhancement. His name is L Rea. I have read several of his articles on anabolic xtreme. The article basically attempted to address why a seasoned competitive bodybuilder, had stopped gaining. It basically went on to say that
most of us, when constructing cycles, always use the route of aas
alone, and that this route, though effective, reaches its threshold of positive developement in a short time. Now granted he did not state what a short time was. Also he stated that each time we use the dosage would have to go up over the long term. He then went on and recommended, a cycle, that included, gh, slin, test enathate evry other day, and then alternated eq with test, and this cycle lasted 28days. Now I am informed enought to know there are no miracle cycles, or drugs. My long winded question is this. I have been educated at this board and many others, that slin, and gh, are things that should be used after a bodybuilder has got the most he can out of gear. I also always thought that until you hit a gram of test or more a week, or high doses of tren
that there was no need for slin and gh yet. I am not saying this is wrong.My question is this, based on what the writer wrote, many gains, including gains made on gear are lost because of ptor, =protein turn over rate, and the reason is that synergy is not used in preparing a cycle, I his terms, synergy bein, gh, slin. My question is again, would it be feasable, that a relatively new bodybiluder, starting out on gear after years of training, use this approach, of adding slin, and gh to a cycle, in hope of maximizing synergy and avoid, as he calls it cascading hormones, catabolism
etc. The article is called perfect beast in this month muscular developement. Now I am thankful to all that respond. But please, save all smart comment for your home, I am not saying I beleive this writers theory, or not, I check here first, as this has been all my sourse for learning. Thanks in advance.
I recently read and article, in muscular developement, By the author, of chemical muscle enhancement. His name is L Rea. I have read several of his articles on anabolic xtreme. The article basically attempted to address why a seasoned competitive bodybuilder, had stopped gaining. It basically went on to say that
most of us, when constructing cycles, always use the route of aas
alone, and that this route, though effective, reaches its threshold of positive developement in a short time. Now granted he did not state what a short time was. Also he stated that each time we use the dosage would have to go up over the long term. He then went on and recommended, a cycle, that included, gh, slin, test enathate evry other day, and then alternated eq with test, and this cycle lasted 28days. Now I am informed enought to know there are no miracle cycles, or drugs. My long winded question is this. I have been educated at this board and many others, that slin, and gh, are things that should be used after a bodybuilder has got the most he can out of gear. I also always thought that until you hit a gram of test or more a week, or high doses of tren
that there was no need for slin and gh yet. I am not saying this is wrong.My question is this, based on what the writer wrote, many gains, including gains made on gear are lost because of ptor, =protein turn over rate, and the reason is that synergy is not used in preparing a cycle, I his terms, synergy bein, gh, slin. My question is again, would it be feasable, that a relatively new bodybiluder, starting out on gear after years of training, use this approach, of adding slin, and gh to a cycle, in hope of maximizing synergy and avoid, as he calls it cascading hormones, catabolism
etc. The article is called perfect beast in this month muscular developement. Now I am thankful to all that respond. But please, save all smart comment for your home, I am not saying I beleive this writers theory, or not, I check here first, as this has been all my sourse for learning. Thanks in advance.