Poor man's HGH and IGF cycle

[gimmejuice]

What if a person used one 126 iu GH kit in about a month, then switched to IGF for a month using 1mg total.

Anyone think this would do shit w/ out steroids?

I'm just contemplating this sort of thing, because I am gyno prone. I spend a lot of $$ on anti-e's every cycle. Also, I think I'd preffer small permanaent gains.

thoughts?

GJ

 

[Tadger]

That really won't accomplish too much besides dropping your %bodyfat. You won't see much of anything in the way of strength or size.

As far as being gyno prone... wanna give us a bit more info there? What cycles have you run and what did your anti-e dosing look like?

 

[vitor]

Hmmm

I think it could work, to put on some lean mass, and cut bodyfat, if you have funds for GH, and IGF-1, look into getting some primo, no gyno, safe, effective, a primo cycle with igf-1 would be amazing to me.

 

[weight77]

IMO you might as well keep buying your regular gear and stick with the anit Es...It would still cost the same..Primo is not cheap...

 

[MikeS]

I understand Im not directly answering the question. But unless you are doing this as a bridge, do AS instead. The BigA formula always was (makes complette sense):
Do steroids first-if you can further afford it do gh-if you can further afford that do IGF1.

Bottomr line - gh and IGF1 are not cost effective. Without gear they wont produce much if any mass either.

 

[gimmejuice]

Thanks for the replies. Hearing other perspectives help.

I've used roids off and on since Atumn 2000, so I understand how to use the drugs. I just feel like I lose more than others when I come off of cycles. But you guys make a good point. I think I'll stick with roids and the anti-e's. I'd be pretty pissed if I threw away $700 with GH and IGF.

thanks
GJ

 

[RipD2DBone]

What's the normal dosage of IGF? How should it be taken?

 

[Mr_Magoo]

I understand Im not directly answering the question. But unless you are doing this as a bridge, do AS instead. The BigA formula always was (makes complette sense):
Do steroids first-if you can further afford it do gh-if you can further afford that do IGF1.

Bottomr line - gh and IGF1 are not cost effective. Without gear they wont produce much if any mass either.

igf will definately produce mass on its own, but not as cost efficient as test/tren

 

[ryubrir]

IGF-1 is good stuff too, but seriously without juice???

also HGH should be used with insulin, and also some T3 to assist in the joint/bone formation. otherwise WTF are you doing even taking it alone, unless you want to cut up a bit? still, you woudl then be wise to use it with at least T3....

but for mass?? time to redo the equation...with all due respect.

 

[Mr_Magoo]

r u saying igf is not good as a stand alone? it is a great drug to use in between cycles to hold if not grow new muscle cells, that and a few other goodies, gh and slin not needed with it, wouldnt hurt, but not needed,