• All new members please introduce your self here and welcome to the board:
    http://www.professionalmuscle.com/forums/showthread.php?t=259
Buy Needles And Syringes With No Prescription
M4B Store Banner
intex
Riptropin Store banner
Generation X Bodybuilding Forum
Buy Needles And Syringes With No Prescription
Buy Needles And Syringes With No Prescription
Mysupps Store Banner
IP Gear Store Banner
PM-Ace-Labs
Ganabol Store Banner
Spend $100 and get bonus needles free at sterile syringes
Professional Muscle Store open now
sunrise2
PHARMAHGH1
kinglab
ganabol2
Professional Muscle Store open now
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
azteca
granabolic1
napsgear-210x65
esquel
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
ashp210
UGFREAK-banner-PM
1-SWEDISH-PEPTIDE-CO
YMSApril21065
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
advertise1
tjk
advertise1
advertise1
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store

scary story

stomper1

New member
Registered
Joined
Nov 10, 2003
Messages
124
I have a friend who really wanted to try fina and he knew I have made my own before using kits. So he asked me about it. I told him I had 2 4g kits and I would just give him one. any way we ordered the pellets and he didn't waste any time brewing up his batch. ( I still have not made my batch yet)He did it correctly using a kit from animal(I have always used animal kits with great success). anyway, he called me the next day after his first shot and told me he felt really sick and thought it might be the fina. I told him I didn't think it was the fina. two days later he called me back and said "don't make that tren".
he had to go to the ER. the dr told him he had pnumonia(spelling). after further tests the dr said to my friend "You have a type of pnumonia that is very common in I.V. drug users". when the dr told my friend this he becared scared and decided to tell the dr about the fina. after hearing about that the dr ran further tests and realized my buddy had quite serious blood infection.
my friend is ok but it has been a week and he is still very sick. he sweats non stop he is on some really strong meds and he wont be able to workout for at least a month.

now, I feel horrible because I gave him the kit. I don't know what could have caused this. I did order the kits over a year ago and now i'm thinking maybe the BA was bad. I did notice that the BA in both bottles had little drops along the sides of the bottles that kinda looked clumpy and stuck to the sides.
what do you guys think? anyone here ever hear of anything like this before?
 
You should e-mail this info to Animal and see what his thoughts are.
 
xcel, I hope you didn't think I was accusing animal of selling bad kits. Please nobody interprit the above to be a bash on animals business. like I said I have used animals kits many times without ever having a problem. In fact I have never used anyone else. READ THE POST AGAIN. I said " I ordered the kit over a year ago and I wonder if the BA was bad" I was implying that maybe the BA went bad over the couse of being stored away for over a year in storage.

I was simply wondering if it is possible for the BA to have gone bad. I want to get this perfectly straight, and I guess it's my fault for not being more clear. when I received the kit over a year ago the BA looked perfectly water clear. now, when I took out the kits last week for the first time in over a year, the BA bottle had little clumpy droplets clinging to the sides of the bottle. That's the best I can do describing it. The last thing I wanted was for anybody to think I was blaming animals kits. that why I wrote in perethesis after stateing my friend used an animal kit " that I always used animal kits with great success" the only reason I mention my friend used an animal kit in the first place was so that no body would think my friend was trying to wing it without a kit or that maybe he used a bogas kit. I was just trying to give details so that it might better help someone reading the post understand the situation and provide me with possible senarios as to why my friend got sick. That's all! that's it!
 
ho one more thing. xcel, I'm not saying for sure that you interprited my original post wrong. I don't know what your intetions where when you wrote your reply. it's just that when I read your reply I though " oh shit, I thing people are taking this out of context"

I mean no disrespect to you excel, you do your job well, and you are always replying to my posts and you have suplied me with a lot of helpful advice and tips in terms of bodybuilding.
 
Ba

Im not sure if it expires or not?

Im not sure on this.. Is it the first time he has ever used tren-Fina?
Is he new to aas in general or just tren?

Clean needles I guess of course, you did filter it thru a whatman?

Lucky for him he is going to be fine it sounds but still a scary deal.

ANimal would take it wrong if you ask him.. I guarantee you
Id say it could be a nuber of things or just a reaction from him
to the hormone. Nerves and being scared probly didnt help much either.

A blood infection? Im not sure, maybe the ba was bad maybe it was just a bad reaction to the hormone. Maybe it was just from real life sickness and had nothing to do with the tren? Hard to pinpoint it.
Dr.s sometimes dont know shit, one will tell you something totally differant then another.

Is your friend at home? is he going to make a full recovery and be Fine?
 
Stomper1

I think Xcel just thought maybe animal could help
or let you know if the kits expire.

I know what you mean though, We know your not blaming him
only looking for some answers..
 
Ok I can help you here...

A blood infection is know as "sepsis". Your freind had to have spiked a cazy high fever for them to do blood cultures. Blood cultures are the only way to find bacteria in the blood. Now where this bacteria came frome Im sure is the lungs. You see the bacteria feed of your body and or fluids from your body. In this case it started in the lungs. It sounds like some of the pellet which i believe is methylcellulose ended up in the lung. Now the bacteria will take major advantage of this, as they will "eat" the substance because It contains some form of carbo (I believe) and along with that your live on your tissues here in the moist warm place of the lungs. Then somehow his body could not fight off these little bastards due to steroid use. IE steroids lower immune response (except Deca). Once the IV antibiotics begin to take effect in about 2-3 days he will begin to feel better. I have to say that I have watched pateints of mine die due to severe sepsis. These patients are usaully sicker than hell to start with. And no I believe he may have had a filter boo boo. Somehow he let a tiny, tiny particle through. This is all speculation really as I did not see the batch made. Alos Benzyl alcohol does denature but were talking 10-12 years. Later.
 
rAJJIN said:
I think Xcel just thought maybe animal could help
or let you know if the kits expire.

I know what you mean though, We know your not blaming him
only looking for some answers..
rAJJIN know exactly what I was insinuating :)

Animal knows his shit and may be able to give you some feedback - kit longivity, what could been the cause to your friend's mishap, etc.
 
zephyr22 said:
And no I believe he may have had a filter boo boo. Somehow he let a tiny, tiny particle through. This is all speculation really as I did not see the batch made. Alos Benzyl alcohol does denature but were talking 10-12 years. Later.
Thanks for that great response.

Do you have any idea what the max fluid temperature you should run through a sterile PVDF filter is? I'm afraid that I may have been warming up the solution TOO much prior to filtering an experiment.
 
Something else to ponder

Since the beginning (hahaha) I've used Animal's kit for converting tren.

He used to have VERY explicit instructions on separating the pellets which could include running it through a coffee filter. He said after pellets were disolved and you added oil, to let it sit overnight, then only draw from the top layer (the majority of fluid) and to avoid drawing any of the dark two bottom layers.

Nowadays - it's like after adding oil, just mix everything up 'cause the filter will catch the methylcellulose?!? I still do my conversion the ol' way. I may be leaving "some" tren in the gunk but believe that I'm not getting any of the binder.
 
I dont think that is really a prob...

All heat will do is increase viscosity of the oil. If you were to filter water (which all viscositys are compared to) you would still filter out all particulates. The thing is to always be carefull and not be sloppy when preparing home brew. But heat can denature steroids. The heat though has to be extremely high and maintained for quite some time. I always warm solutions before filtering. This decreases pressure on the hands. I used to push the dang syringe so hard my hands would turn purple. If anyone needs medical help let me know as I can interprate blood work etc.... Later.
 
zephyr22 said:
The thing is to always be carefull and not be sloppy when preparing home brew. But heat can denature steroids. The heat though has to be extremely high and maintained for quite some time.
Thanks for being such an asset to this board zephyr22!

I'm probably gonna show my ignorance with this question. It was my understanding that the "melting point" of a steroid was where you can begin to degrade the steroid. I was under the impression that once it was suspended in oil, it tends to be be the temperature that will damage the oil is what you need to be concerned with.

Kinda like deca, test enanthate, etc have very low melting points but once they're suspended, they're fine. I'm also asking this as it relates to "baking" a finished product as an addtional "precautionary" measure (I realize this or sterile filtering does not "sterilze" a product). I generall bake products that are suspended in oil or PEG at 250 F for 10 min then let cool for 15, then repeat 2 more times. I was told that it was the heating/cooling action that kills additional/some (don't know what term to use here :) ) bacteria? I always say NEVER bake a finished product that suspended in water.
 
Well....

Yes when the steroid is put into solution with oil it decreases your chance of degrading the hormone with heat. The oil acts like a buffer between the heat and the steroid. Also it increases the amount of heat needed to "kill" bacteria.. Actually to kill most bacteria you need at least 275 degrees and at least 30-75lbs of pressure. This is usually done by a ottoclave. However steroids are usaully sterilized by radiation. This way no excessive heat would be involved. Heating and cooling your experiments to 250 two or three times as well as filtering and using "sterile technique" you should be fine. I have done this many times and have never had an infection etc... I have keflex on hand if anything do go awry. The product you produce at your own home is probably as good if not better than most mex goods. You see vet gear is not as stringent on sterility. Who really gives a shit if a cow or pig get a abcess or infection???? Your doing it right Xcel, your taking the right precautions as long as like i said using sterile technique. Later.
 
yes...

Never bake water based product. Unless you want a test suspension ball hahahah. Well ill tell you what Kaotik is the shit when it comes to doing kits and water suspensions etc.... Later.
 
Zephyr22

I like you more and more everytime I read your posts!
Good info and Im glad we have you here in our crew.
are you a doc? Or in the medical field? you seem to be very Knowledgable
on these things.
 
I had a old friend (for 15yrs) who got an infection (bacterial) from IM injection. Using needles more than once. I always gave him hell for that. He died from endocarditis-the bacteria ate his heart valve and he has several cardiac arrests before passing. RIP Big Rich. :(
 
Well thanks...

I do appreciate the kind words. I do work in the medical field but it would be kind of hard to say what I do since legalities etc....force me to do otherwise. Like I said I can interpret lab tests values if people need it. I have a lot of experience with anabolics etc. Yeah otherwise Im a basic jackass. I really enjoy the people of this board. This board is real. As in real I mean everyone isnt 5'8'' 280lb, and people are not popping off at each other. I like to help who I can. So if anyone needs me im here. Later.
 
great replies

zephyr22 what an asset you are to this board
 
I hate reading post like this, make me want to re-filter all my gear. Its good to have a bro like Zephyr22 on are side.

Heres a read i found, thought it was good:

Introduction
The control of microbial growth is necessary in many practical situations, and significant advances in agriculture, medicine, and food science have been made through study of this area of microbiology.
"Control of growth", as used here, means to prevent growth of microorganisms. This control is effected in two basic ways: (1) by killing microorganisms or (2) by inhibiting the growth of microorganisms. Control of growth usually involves the use of physical or chemical agents which either kill or prevent the growth of microorganisms. Agents which kill cells are called cidal agents; agents which inhibit the growth of cells (without killing them) are referred to as static agents. Thus the term bactericidal refers to killing bacteria and bacteriostatic refers to inhibiting the growth of bacterial cells. A bactericide kills bacteria, a fungicide kills fungi, and so on.

Sterilization is the complete destruction or elimination of all viable organisms (in or on an object being sterilized). There are no degrees of sterilization: an object is either sterile or not. Sterilization procedures involve the use of heat, radiation or chemicals, or physical removal of cells.

Methods of Sterilization

Heat: most important and widely used. For sterilization always consider type of heat, time of application and temperature to ensure destruction of all microorganisms. Endospores of bacteria are considered the most thermoduric of all cells so their destruction guarantees sterility.

Incineration: burns organisms and physically destroys them. Used for needles , inoculating wires, glassware, etc. and objects not destroyed in the incineration process.

Boiling: 100o for 30 minutes. Kills everything except some endospores (Actually, for the purposes of purifying drinking water 100o for five minutes is probably adequate though there have been some reports that Giardia cysts can survive this process). To kill endospores, and therefore sterilize the solution, very long or intermittent boiling is required.

Autoclaving (steam under pressure or pressure cooker): 121o for 15 minutes (15#/in2 pressure). Good for sterilizing almost anything, but heat-labile substances will be denatured or destroyed.

Dry heat (hot air oven): 160o/2hours or 170o/1hour. Used for glassware, metal, and objects that won't melt.
The protocol and recommendations for the use of heat to control microbial growth are given in Table 1.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 1. Recommended use of heat to control bacterial growth
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Treatment Temperature Effectiveness
Incineration >500o Vaporizes organic material on nonflammable surfaces but may destroy many substances in the process
Boiling 100o 30 minutes of boiling kills microbial pathogens and vegetative forms of bacteria but may not kill bacterial endospores
Intermittent boiling 100o Three 30-minute intervals of boiling, followed by periods of cooling kills bacterial endospores
Autoclave and pressure cooker (steam under pressure) 121o/15 minutes at 15# pressure kills all forms of life including bacterial endospores. The substance being sterilized must be maintained at the effective T for the full time
Dry heat (hot air oven) 160o/2 hours For materials that must remain dry and which are not destroyed at T between 121o and 170o Good for glassware, metal, not plastic or rubber items
Dry heat (hot air oven) 170o/1 hour Same as above. Note increasing T by 10 degrees shortens the sterilizing time by 50 percent
Pasteurization (batch method) 63o/30 minutes kills most vegetative bacterial cells including pathogens such as streptococci, staphylococci and Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Pasteurization (flash method) 72o/15 seconds Effect on bacterial cells similar to batch method; for milk, this method is more conducive to industry and has fewer undesirable effects on quality or taste

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Irradiation: usually destroys or distorts nucleic acids. Ultraviolet light is usually used (commonly used to sterilize the surfaces of objects), although x-rays and microwaves are possibly useful.

Filtration: involvres the physical removal (exclusion) of all cells in a liquid or gas, especially important to sterilize solutions which would be denatured by heat (e.g. antibiotics, injectable drugs, amino acids, vitamins, etc.)

Chemical and gas: (formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde, ethylene oxide) toxic chemicals kill all forms of life in a specialized gas chamber.


Control of Microbial Growth by Physical Agents

Applications of Heat The lethal temperature varies in microorganisms. The time required to kill depends on the number of organisms, species, nature of the product being heated, pH, and temperature. Whenever heat is used to control microbial growth inevitably both time and temperature are considered.

Sterilization (boiling, autoclaving, hot air oven) kills all microorganisms with heat; commonly employed in canning, bottling, and other sterile packaging procedures.

Pasteurization is the use of mild heat to reduce the number of microorganisms in a product or food. In the case of pasteurization of milk the time and temperature depend on killing potential pathogens that are transmitted in milk, i.e., staphylococci, streptococci, Brucella abortus and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. For pasteurzation of milk: batch nethod: 63o/30minutes; flash method: 71o/15 seconds.

Low temperature (refrigeration and freezing): Most organisms grow very little or not at all at 0o. Store perishable foods at low temperatues to slow rate of growth and consequent spoilage (e.g. milk). Low temperatures are not bactericidal. Psychrotrophs, rather than true psychrophiles, are the usual cause of food spoilage in refrigerated foods.

Drying (removal of H2O): Most microorganisms cannot grow at reduced water activity (Aw < 0.90). Often used to preserve foods (e.g. fruits, grains, etc.). Methods involve removal of water from product by heat, evaporation, freeze-drying, addition of salt or sugar.

Irradiation (microwave, UV, x-ray): destroys microorganisms as described under "sterilization". Many spoilage organisms are easily killed by irradiation. In some parts of Europe, fruits and vegetables are irradiated to increase their shelf life up to 500 percent. The practice has not been accepted in the U.S.


Control of microbial growth by chemical agents

Antimicrobial agents are chemicals that kill or inhibit the growth microorganisms. Antimicrobial agents include chemical preservatives and antiseptics, as well as drugs used in the treatment of infectious diseases of plants and animals. Antimicrobial agents may be of natural or synthetic origin, and they may have a static or cidal effect on microorganisms.


Types of antimicrobial agents

Antiseptics: microbicidal agents harmless enough to be applied to the skin and mucous membrane; should not be taken internaslly. Examples: mercurials, silver nitrate, iodine solution, alcohols, detergents.

Disinfectants: Agents that kill microorganisms, but not necessarily their spores,not safe for application to living tissues; they are used on inanimate objects such as tables, floors, utensils, etc. Examples: chlorine, hypochlorites, chlorine compounds, lye, copper sulfate, quaternary ammonium compounds.

Note: disinfectants and antiseptics are distinguished on the basis of whether they are safe for application to mucous membranes. Often, safety depends on the concentration of the compound. For example, sodium hypochlorite (chlorine), as added to water is safe for drinking, but "chlorox" (5% hypochlorite), an excellent disinfectant, is hardly safe to drink.

Common antiseptics and disinfectants and their uses are summarized in Table 2.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 2. Common antiseptics and disinfectants
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chemical Action Uses
Ethanol (50-70%) Denatures proteins and solubilizes lipids Antiseptic used on skin
Isopropanol (50-70%) Denatures proteins and solubilizes lipids Antiseptic used on skin
Formaldehyde (8%) Reacts with NH2, SH and COOH groups Disinfectant, kills endospores
Tincture of Iodine (2% I2 in 70% alcohol) Inactivates proteins Antiseptic used on skin
Chlorine (Cl2) gas Forms hypochlorous acid (HClO), a strong oxidizing agent Disinfect drinking water; general disinfectant
Silver nitrate (AgNO3) Precipitates proteins General antiseptic and used in the eyes of newborns
Mercuric chloride Inactivates proteins by reacting with sulfide groups Disinfectant, although occasionally used as an antiseptic on skin
Detergents (e.g. quaternary ammonium compounds) Disrupts cell membranes Skin antiseptics and disinfectants
Phenolic compounds (e.g. carboloic acid, lysol, hexylresorcinol, hexachlorophene) Denature proteins and disrupt cell membranes Antiseptics at low concentrations; disinfectants at high concentrations
Ethylene oxide gas Alkylating agent Disinfectant used to sterilize heat-sensitive objects such as rubber and plastics

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Preservatives: static agents used to inhibit the growth of microorganisms, most often in foods. If eaten they should be nontoxic. Examples; calcium propionate, sodium benzoate, formaldehyde, nitrate, sulfur dioxide. Table 3 is a list of common preservative and their uses.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 3. Common food preservatives and their uses
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preservative Effective Concentration Uses
Propionic acid and propionates 0.32% Antifungal agent in breads, cake, Swiss cheeses
Sorbic acid and sorbates 0.2% Antifungal agent in cheeses, jellies, syrups, cakes
Benzoic acid and benzoates 0.1% Antifungal agent in margarine, cider, relishes, soft drinks
Sodium diacetate 0.32% Antifungal agent in breads
Lactic acid unknown Antimicrobial agent in cheeses, buttermilk, yogurt and pickled foods
Sulfur dioxide, sulfites 200-300 ppm Antimicrobial agent in dried fruits, grapes, molasses
Sodium nitrite 200 ppm Antibacterial agent in cured meats, fish
Sodium chloride unknown Prevents microbial spoilage of meats, fish, etc.
Sugar unknown Prevents microbial spoilage of preserves, jams, syrups, jellies, etc.
Wood smoke unknown Prevents microbial spoilage of meats, fish, etc.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Chemotherapeutic agents: antimicrobial agents of synthetic origin useful in the treatment of microbial or viral disease. Examples: sulfonilamides, isoniazid, ethambutol, AZT, chloramphenicol. Note that the microbiologist's definition of a chemotherapeutic agent requires that the agent be used for antimicrobial purposes and so excludes synthetic agents used for therapy against diseases that are not of microbial origin.

Antibiotics: antimicrobial agents produced by microorganisms that kill or inhibit other microorganisms. This is the microbiologist's definition. A more broadened definition of an antibiotic includes any chemical of natural origin (from any type of cell) which has the effect to kill or inhibit the growth of other types cells. Since most clinically-useful antibiotics are produced by microorganisms and are used to kill or inhibit infectious Bacteria, we will follow the classic definition.

Antibiotics are low molecular-weight (non-protein) molecules produced as secondary metabolites, mainly by microorganisms that live in the soil. Most of these microorganisms form some type of a spore or other dormant cell, and there is thought to be some relationship (besides temporal) between antibiotic production and the processes of sporulation. Among the molds, the notable antibiotic producers are Penicillium and Cephalosporium , which are the main source of the beta-lactam antibiotics (penicillin and its relatives). In the Bacteria, the Actinomycetes, notably Streptomyces species, produce a variety of types of antibiotics including the aminoglycosides (e.g. streptomycin), macrolides (e.g. erythromycin), and the tetracyclines. Endospore-forming Bacillus species produce polypeptide antibiotics such as polymyxin and bacitracin. The table below (Table 4) is a summary of the classes of antibiotics and their properties including their biological sources.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 4. Classes of antibiotics and their properties Chemical class Examples Biological source Spectrum (effective against) Mode of action
Beta-lactams (penicillins and cephalosporins) Penicillin G, Cephalothin Penicillium notatum and Cephalosporium species Gram-positive bacteria Inhibits steps in cell wall (peptidoglycan) synthesis and murein assembly
Semisynthetic penicillin Ampicillin, Amoxycillin Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria Inhibits steps in cell wall (peptidoglycan) synthesis and murein assembly
Clavulanic Acid Clavamox is clavulanic acid plus amoxycillin Streptomyces clavuligerus Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria Suicide inhibitor of beta-lactamases
Monobactams Aztreonam Chromobacter violaceum Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria Inhibits steps in cell wall (peptidoglycan) synthesis and murein assembly
Carboxypenems Imipenem Streptomyces cattleya Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria Inhibits steps in cell wall (peptidoglycan) synthesis and murein assembly
Aminoglycosides Streptomycin Streptomyces griseus Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria Inhibit translation (protein synthesis)
Gentamicin Micromonospora species Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria esp. Pseudomonas Inhibit translation (protein synthesis)
Glycopeptides Vancomycin Streptomyces orientales Gram-positive bacteria, esp. Staphylococcus aureus Inhibits steps in murein (peptidoglycan) biosynthesis and assembly
Lincomycins Clindamycin Streptomyces lincolnensis Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria esp. anaerobic Bacteroides Inhibits translation (protein synthesis)
Macrolides Erythromycin Streptomyces erythreus Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria not enterics, Neisseria, Legionella, Mycoplasma Inhibits translation (protein synthesis)
Polypeptides Polymyxin Bacillus polymyxa Gram-negative bacteria Damages cytoplasmic membranes
Bacitracin Bacillus subtilis Gram-positive bacteria Inhibits steps in murein (peptidoglycan) biosynthesis and assembly
Polyenes Amphotericin Streptomyces nodosus Fungi Inactivate membranes containing sterols
Nystatin Streptomyces noursei Fungi (Candida) Inactivate membranes containing sterols
Rifamycins Rifampicin Streptomyces mediterranei Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, Mycobacterium tuberculosis Inhibits transcription (eubacterial RNA polymerase)
Tetracyclines Tetracycline Streptomyces species Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, Rickettsias Inhibit translation (protein synthesis)
Semisynthetic tetracycline Doxycycline Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, Rickettsias Ehrlichia, Borellia Inhibit translation (protein synthesis)
Chloramphenicol Chloramphenicol Streptomyces venezuelae Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria Inhibits translation (protein synthesis)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Antimicrobial Agents Used in the Treatment of Infectious Disease

The modern era of antimicrobial chemotherapy began in 1929 with Fleming's discovery of the powerful bactericidal substance penicillin, and Domagk's discovery in 1935 of synthetic chemicals (sulfonamides) with broad antimicrobial activity. In the early 1940's, spurred partially by the need for antibacterial agents in WW II, penicillin was isolated, purified and injected into experimental animals, where it was found to not only cure infections but also to possess incredibly low toxicity for the animals. This fact ushered into being the age of antibiotic chemotherapy and an intense search for similar antimicrobial agents of low toxicity to animals that might prove useful in the treatment of infectious disease. The rapid isolation of streptomycin, chloramphenicol and tetracycline soon followed, and by the 1950's, these and several other antibiotics were in clinical usage.

The most important property of a clinically-useful antimicrobial agent, especially from the patient's point of view, is its selective toxicity, i.e., that the agent acts in some way that inhibits or kills bacterial pathogens but has little or no toxic effect on the animal taking the drug This implies that the biochemical processes in the bacteria are in some way different from those in the animal cells, and that the advantage of this difference can be taken in chemotherapy. Antibiotics may have a cidal (killing) effect or a static (inhibitory) effect on a range of microbes. The range of bacteria or other microorganisms that are affected by a certain antibiotic are is expressed as its spectrum of action. Antibiotics effective against procaryotes which kill or inhibit a wide range of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria are said to be broad spectrum . If effective mainly against Gram-positive or Gram-negative bacteria, they are narrow spectrum . If effective against a single organism or disease, they are referred to as limited spectrum.


Kinds of Antimicrobial Agents and their Primary Modes of Action

1. Cell wall synthesis inhibitors Cell wall synthesis inhibitors generally inhibit some step in the synthesis of bacterial peptidoglycan. Generally they exert their selective toxicity against eubacteria because human cells lack cell walls.

Beta lactam antibiotics Chemically, these antibiotics contain a 4-membered beta lactam ring. They are the products of two groups of fungi, Penicillium and Cephalosporium molds, and are correspondingly represented by the penicillins and cephalosporins. The beta lactam antibiotics inhibit the last step in peptidoglycan synthesis, the final cross-linking between between peptide side chains, mediated by bacterial carboxypeptidase and transpeptidase enzymes . Beta lactam antibiotics are normally bactericidal and require that cells be actively growing in order to exert their toxicity.

Natural penicillins, such as Penicillin G or Penicillin V, are produced by fermentation of Penicillium chrysogenum. They are effective against streptococcus, gonococcus and staphylococcus, except where resistance has developed. They are considered narrow spectrum since they are not effective against Gram-negative rods.

Semisynthetic penicillins first appeared in 1959. A mold produces the main part oif the molecule (6-aminopenicillanic acid) which can be modified chemically by the addition of side shains. Many of these compounds have been developed to have distinct benefits or advantages over penicillin G, such as increased spectrum of activity (effectiveness against Gram-negative rods), resistance to penicillinase, effectiveness when administered orally, etc. Amoxycillin and Ampicillin have broadened spectra against Gram-negatives and are effective orally; Methicillin is penicillinase-resistant.

Clavulanic acid is a chemical sometimes added to a semisynthetic penicillin preparation. Thus, amoxycillin plus clavulanate is clavamox or augmentin. The clavulanate is not an antimicrobial agent. It inhibits beta lactamase enzymes and has given extended life to penicillinase-sensitive beta lactams.

Although nontoxic, penicillins occasionally cause death when administered to persons who are allergic to them. In the U.S. there are 300 - 500 deaths annually due to penicillin allergy. In allergic individuals the beta lactam molecule attaches to a serum protein which initiates an IgE-mediated inflammatory response.

Cephalolsporins are beta lactam antibiotics with a similar mode of action to penicillins that are produced by species of Cephalosporium. The have a low toxicity and a somewhat broader spectrum than natural penicillins. They are often used as penicillin substitutes, against Gram-negative bacteria, and in surgical prophylaxis. They are subject to degradation by some bacterial beta-lactamases, but they tend to be resistant to beta-lactamases from S. aureus .

Bacitracin is a polypeptide antibiotic produced by Bacillus species. It prevents cell wall growth by inhibiting the release of the muropeptide subunits of peptidoglycan from the lipid carrier molecule that carries the subunit to the outside of the membrane Teichoic acid synthesis, which requires the same carrier, is also inhibited. Bacitracin has a high toxicity which precludes its systemic use. It is present in many topical antibiotic preparations, and since it is not absorbed by the gut, it is given to "sterilize" the bowel prior to surgery.

2. Cell membrane inhibitors disorganize the structure or inhibit the function of bacterial membranes. The integrity of the cytoplasmic and outer membranes is vital to bacteria, and compounds that disorganize the membranes rapidly kill the cells. However, due to the similarities in phospholipids in eubacterial and eukaryotic membranes, this action is rarely specific enough to permit these compounds to be used systemically. The only antibacterial antibiotic of clinical importance that acts by this mechanism is Polymyxin, produced by Bacillus polymyxis. Polymyxin is effective mainly against Gram-negative bacteria and is usually limited to topical usage. Polymyxins bind to membrane phospholipids and thereby interfere with membrane function. Polymyxin is occasionally given for urinary tract infections caused by Pseudomonas that are gentamicin, carbenicillin and tobramycin resistant. The balance between effectiveness and damage to the kidney and other organs is dangerously close, and the drug should only be given under close supervision in the hospital.

3. Protein synthesis inhibitors Many therapeutically useful antibiotics owe their action to inhibition of some step in the complex process of translation. Their attack is always at one of the events occurring on the ribosome and rather than the stage of amino acid activation or attachment to a particular tRNA. Most have an affinity or specificity for 70S (as opposed to 80S) ribosomes, and they achieve their selective toxicity in this manner. The most important antibiotics with this mode of action are the tetracyclines, chloramphenicol, the macrolides (e.g. erythromycin) and the aminoglycosides (e.g. streptomycin).

The aminoglycosides are products of Streptomyces species and are represented by streptomycin, kanamycin, tobramycin and gentamicin. These antibiotics exert their activity by binding to bacterial ribosomes and preventing the initiation of protein synthesis. Aminoglycosides have been used against a wide variety of bacterial infections caused by Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Streptomycin has been used extensively as a primary drug in the treatment of tuberculosis. Gentamicin is active against many strains of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, including some strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Kanamycin (a complex of three antibiotics, A, B and C) is active at low concentrations against many Gram-positive bacteria, including penicillin-resistant staphylococci. Gentamicin and Tobramycin are mainstays for treatment of Pseudomonas infections. An unfortunate side effect of aminoglycosides has tended to restrict their usage: prolonged use is known to impair kidney function and cause damage to the auditory nerves leading to deafness.

The tetracyclines consist of eight related antibiotics which are all natural products of Streptomyces, although some can now be produced semisynthetically. Tetracycline, chlortetracycline and doxycycline are the best known. The tetracyclines are broad-spectrum antibiotics with a wide range of activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. The tetracyclines act by blocking the binding of aminoacyl tRNA to the A site on the ribosome. Tetracyclines inhibit protein synthesis on isolated 70S or 80S (eukaryotic) ribosomes, and in both cases, their effect is on the small ribosomal subunit. However, most bacteria possess an active transport system for tetracycline that will allow intracellular accumulation of the antibiotic at concentrations 50 times as great as that in the medium. This greatly enhances its antibacterial effectiveness and accounts for its specificity of action, since an effective concentration cannot be accumulated in animal cells. Thus a blood level of tetracycline which is harmless to animal tissues can halt protein synthesis in invading bacteria.

The tetracyclines have a remarkably low toxicity and minimal side effects when taken by animals. The combination of their broad spectrum and low toxicity has led to their overuse and misuse by the medical community and the wide-spread development of resistance has reduced their effectiveness. Nonetheless, tetracyclines still have some important uses, such as in the treatment of Lyme disease.

Chloramphenicol has a broad spectrum of activity but it exerts a bacteriostatic effect. It is effective against intracellular parasites such as the rickettsiae. Unfortunately, aplastic anemia, which is dose related develops in a small proportion (1/50,000) of patients. Chloramphenicol was originally discovered and purified from the fermentation of a Streptomyces, but currently it is produced entirely by chemical synthesis. Chloramphenicol inhibits the bacterial enzyme peptidyl transferase thereby preventing the growth of the polypeptide chain during protein synthesis.

Chloramphenicol is entirely selective for 70S ribosomes and does not affect 80S ribosomes. Its unfortunate toxicity towards the small proportion of patients who receive it is in no way related to its effect on bacterial protein synthesis. However, since mitochondria probably originated from procaryotic cells and have 70S ribosomes, they are subject to inhibition by some of the protein synthesis inhibitors including chloroamphenicol. This likely explains the toxicity of chloramphenicol. The eukaryotic cells most likely to be inhibited by chloramphenicol are those undergoing rapid multiplication, thereby rapidly synthesizing mitochondria. Such cells include the blood forming cells of the bone marrow, the inhibition of which could present as aplastic anemia. Chloramphenicol was once a highly prescribed antibiotic and a number of deaths from anemia occurred before its use was curtailed. Now it is seldom used in human medicine except in life-threatening situations (e.g. typhoid fever).

The Macrolides are a family of antibiotics whose structures contain large lactone rings linked through glycoside bonds with amino sugars. The most important members of the group are erythromycin and oleandomycin. Erythromycin is active against most Gram-positive bacteria, Neisseria, Legionella and Haemophilus, but not against the Enterobacteriaceae. Macrolides inhibit bacterial protein synthesis by binding to the 50S ribosomal subunit. Binding inhibits elongation of the protein by peptidyl transferase or prevents translocation of the ribosome or both. Macrolides are bacteriostatic for most bacteria but are cidal for a few Gram-positive bacteria.

4. Effects on Nucleic Acids Some chemotherapeutic agents affect the synthesis of DNA or RNA, or can bind to DNA or RNA so that their messages cannot be read. Either case, of course, can block the growth of cells. The majority of these drugs are unselective, however, and affect animal cells and bacterial cells alike and therefore have no therapeutic application. Two nucleic acid synthesis inhibitors which have selective activity against procaryotes and some medical utility are nalidixic acid and rifamycins.

Nalidixic acid is a synthetic chemotherapeutic agent which has activity mainly against Gram-negative bacteria. Nalidixic acid belongs to a group of compounds called quinolones. Nalidixic acid is a bactericidal agent that binds to the DNA gyrase enzyme (topoisomerase) which is essential for DNA replication and allows supercoils to be relaxed and reformed. Binding of the drug inhibits DNA gyrase activity.

Some quinolones penetrate macrophages and neutrophils better than most antibiotics and are thus useful in treatment of infections caused by intracellular parasites. However, the main use of nalidixic acid is in treatment of lower urinary tract infections (UTI). The compound is unusual in that it is effective against several types of Gram-negative bacteria such as E. coli, Enterobacter aerogenes, K. pneumoniae and species which are common causes of UTI. It is not usually effective against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Gram-positive bacteria are resistant. However, a fluoroquinolone, Ciprofloxacin (Cipro) was recently recommended as the drug of choice for prophylaxis and treatment of anthrax.

The rifamycins are also the products of Streptomyces. Rifampicin is a semisynthetic derivative of rifamycin that is active against Gram-positive bacteria (including Mycobacterium tuberculosis) and some Gram-negative bacteria. Rifampicin acts quite specifically on eubacterial RNA polymerase and is inactive towards RNA polymerase from animal cells or towards DNA polymerase. The antibiotic binds to the beta subunit of the polymerase and apparently blocks the entry of the first nucleotide which is necessary to activate the polymerase, thereby blocking mRNA synthesis. It has been found to have greater bactericidal effect against M .tuberculosis than other anti-tuberculosis drugs, and it has largely replaced isoniazid as one of the front-line drugs used to treat the disease, especially when isoniazid resistance is indicated. It is effective orally and penetrates well into the cerebrospinal fluid and is therefore useful for treatment of tuberculosis meningitis and meningitis caused by Neisseria meningitidis.

5. Competitive Inhibitors The competitive inhibitors are mostly all synthetic chemotherapeutic agents. Most are "growth factor analogs" which are structurally similar to a bacterial growth factor but which do not fulfill its metabolic function in the cell. Some are bacteriostatic and some are bactericidal.

Sulfonamides were introduced as chemotherapeutic agents by Domagk in 1935, who showed that one of these compounds (prontosil) had the effect of curing mice with infections caused by beta-hemolytic streptococci. Chemical modifications of the compound sulfanilamide gave compounds with even higher and broader antibacterial activity. The resulting sulfonamides have broadly similar antibacterial activity, but differ widely in their pharmacological actions. Bacteria which are almost always sensitive to the sulfonamides include Streptococcus pneumoniae, beta-hemolytic streptococci and E. coli. The sulfonamides have been extremely useful in the treatment of uncomplicated UTI caused by E. coli, and in the treatment of meningococcal meningitis (because they cross the blood-brain barrier).

The sulfonamides (e.g. Gantrisin) and Trimethoprim are inhibitors of the bacterial enzymes required for the synthesis of tetrahydofolic acid (THF), the vitamin form of folic acid essential for 1-carbon transfer reactions. Sulfonamides are structurally similar to para aminobenzoic acid (PABA), the substrate for the first enzyme in the THF pathway, and they competitively inhibit that step . Trimethoprim is structurally similar to dihydrofolate (DHF) and competitively inhibits the second step in THF synthesis mediated by the DHF reductase. Animal cells do not synthesize their own folic acid but obtain it in a preformed fashion as a vitamin. Since animals do not make folic acid, they are not affected by these drugs, which achieve their selective toxicity for bacteria on this basis.

Three additional synthetic chemotherapeutic agents have been used in the treatment of tuberculosis: isoniazid (INH), paraaminosalicylic acid (PAS), and ethambutol. The usual strategy in the treatment of tuberculosis has been to administer a single antibiotic (historically streptomycin, but now, most commonly, rifampicin is given) in conjunction with INH and ethambutol. Since the tubercle bacillus rapidly develops resistance to the antibiotic, ethambutol and INH are given to prevent outgrowth of a resistant strain. It must also be pointed out that the tubercle bacillus rapidly develops resistance to ethambutol and INH if either drug is used alone. Ethambutol inhibits incorporation of mycolic acids into the mycobacterial cell wall. Isoniazid has been reported to inhibit mycolic acid synthesis in mycobacteria and since it is an analog of pyridoxine (Vitamin B6) it may inhibit pyridoxine catalyzed reactions as well. Isoniazid is activated by a mycobacterial peroxidase enzyme and destroys several targets in the cell. PAS is an anti-folate. PAS was once a primary anti-tuberculosis drug, but now it is a secondary agent, having been largely replaced by ethambutol.


Bacterial resistance to antibiotics

Penicillin became generally available for treatment of bacterial infections, especially those caused by staphylococci and streptococci, about 1946. Initially, the antibiotic was effective against all sorts of infections caused by these two Gram-positive bacteria. Resistance to penicillin in some strains of staphylococci was recognized almost immediately. (Resistance to penicillin today occurs in as many as 80% of all strains of Staphylococcus aureus). Surprisingly, Streptococcus pyogenes (Group A strep) have never fully developed resistance to penicillin and it remains a reasonable choice antibiotic for many types of streptococcal infections. Natural penicillins have never been effective against most Gram-negative pathogens (e.g. Salmonella, Shigella, Bordetella pertussis, Yersinia pestis, Pseudomonas) with the notable exception of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Gram-negative bacteria are inherently resistant because their vulnerable cell wall is protected by an outer membrane that prevents permeation of the penicillin molecule.

The period of the late 1940s and early 1950s saw the discovery and introduction of streptomycin, chloramphenicol, and tetracycline, and the age of antibiotic chemotherapy came into full being. These antibiotics were effective against the full array of bacterial pathogens including Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, intracellular parasites, and the tuberculosis bacillus. However, by 1953, during a Shigella outbreak in Japan, a strain of the dysentery bacillus was isolated which was multiple drug resistant, exhibiting resistance to chloramphenicol, tetracycline, streptomycin, and the sulfanilamides. There was also evidence mounting that bacteria could pass genes for multiple drug resistance between strains and even between species. It was also apparent that Mycobacterium tuberculosis was capable of rapid development of resistance to streptomycin which had become a mainstay in tuberculosis therapy.

By the 1960's it became apparent that some bacterial pathogens were developing resistance to antibiotic-after-antibiotic, at a rate faster than new antibiotics could be brought to market. A more conservative approach to the use of antibiotics has not been fully accepted by the medical and agricultural communities, and the problems of emerging multiple-drug resistant pathogens still loom. The most important pathogens to emerge in multiple drug resistant forms so far have been Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Staphylococcus aureus.


The basis of bacterial resistance to antibiotics

Inherent (Natural) Resistance Bacteria may be inherently resistant to an antibiotic. For example, a streptomycete has some gene that is responsible for resistance to its own antibiotic; or a Gram-negative bacterium has an outer membrane that establishes a permeability barrier against the antibiotic; or an organism lacks a transport system for the antibiotic; or it lacks the target or reaction that is hit by the antibiotic.

Acquired Resistance Bacteria can develop resistance to antibiotics, e.g. bacterial populations previously-sensitive to antibiotics become resistant. This type of resistance results from changes in the bacterial genome. Acquired resistance is driven by two genetic processes in bacteria: (1) mutation and selection (sometimes referred to as vertical evolution); (2) exchange of genes between strains and species (sometimes called horizontal evolution).

Vertical evolution is strictly a matter of Darwinian evolution driven by principles of natural selection: a spontaneous mutation in the bacterial chromosome imparts resistance to a member of the bacterial population. In the selective environment of the antibiotic, the wild type (non mutants) are killed and the resistant mutant is allowed to grow and flourish. The mutation rate formost bacterial genes is approximately 10-8. This means that if a bacterial population doubles from 108 cells to 2 x 108 cells, there is likely to be a mutant present for any given gene. Since bacteria grow to reach population densities far in excess of 109 cells, such a mutant could develop from a single generation during 15 minutes of growth.

Horizontal evolution is the acquisition of genes for resistance from another organism. For example, a streptomycete has a gene for resistance to streptomycin (its own antibiotic), but somehow that gene escapes and gets into E. coli or Shigella. Or, more likely, Some bacterium develops genetic resistance through the process of mutation and selection and then donates these genesto some other bacterium through one of several processes for genetic exchange that exist in bacteria.

Bacteria are able to exchange genes in nature by three processes: conjugation, transduction and transformation. Conjugation involves cell-to-cell contact as DNA crosses a sex pilus from donor to recipient. During transduction, a virus transfers the genes between mating bacteria. In transformation, DNA is acquired directly from the environment, having been released from another cell. Genetic recombination can follow the transfer of DNA from one cell to another leading to the emergence of a new genotype (recombinant). It is common for DNA to be transferred as plasmids between mating bacteria. Since bacteria usually develop their genes for drug resistance on plasmids (called resistance transfer factors, or RTFs), they are able to spread drug resistance to other strains and species during genetic exchange processes.

The combined effects of fast growth rates, high concentrations of cells, genetic processes of mutation and selection, and the ability to exchange genes, account for the extraordinary rates of adaptation and evolution that can be observed in the bacteria. For these reasons bacterial adaptation (resistance) to the antibiotic environment seems to take place very rapidly in evolutionary time: bacteria evolve fast!


The medical problem of bacterial drug resistance

Obviously, if a bacterial pathogen is able to develop or acquire resistance to an antibiotic, then that substance becomes useless in the treatment of infectious disease caused by that pathogen (unless the resistance can somehow be overcome with secondary measures). So as pathogens develop resistance, we must find new (different) antibiotics to fill the place of the old ones in treatment regimes. Hence, natural penicillins have become useless against staphylococci and must be replaced by other antibiotics; tetracycline, having been so widely used and misused for decades, has become worthless for many of the infections that once designated it as a "wonder drug".

Not only is there a problem in finding new antibiotics to fight old diseases (because resistant strains of bacteria have emerged), there is a parallel problem to find new antibiotics to fight new diseases. In the past two decades, many "new" bacterial diseases have been discovered (Legionnaire's disease, gastric ulcers, Lyme disease, toxic shock syndrome, "skin-eating" streptococci). We are only now able to examine patterns of susceptibility and resistance to antibiotics among new pathogens that cause these diseases. Broad patterns of resistance exist in these pathogens, and it seems likely that we will soon need new antibiotics to replace the handful that are effective now against these bacteria, especially as resistance begins to emerge among them in the selective environment antibiotic chemotherapy.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Return to the Bacteriology 303 Main Page



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Written and edited by Kenneth Todar University of Wisconsin-Madison Department of Bacteriology. All rights reserved.
 
thanks

thanks rAJJIN, xcel, zephyr22 and everyone else who took the time to read my post and respond.
my friend will be ok but he is still sweating like crazy and coughing up some nasty junk.
I just wish I knew what exactly went wrong with the experiment. I hear ya skinny D, I hate when this kinda shit happens too.
 

Staff online

  • Big A
    IFBB PRO/NPC JUDGE/Administrator

Forum statistics

Total page views
559,516,036
Threads
136,104
Messages
2,779,477
Members
160,440
Latest member
Iron Mountain 75
NapsGear
HGH Power Store email banner
your-raws
Prowrist straps store banner
infinity
FLASHING-BOTTOM-BANNER-210x131
raws
Savage Labs Store email
Syntherol Site Enhancing Oil Synthol
aqpharma
YMSApril210131
hulabs
ezgif-com-resize-2-1
MA Research Chem store banner
MA Supps Store Banner
volartek
Keytech banner
musclechem
Godbullraw-bottom-banner
Injection Instructions for beginners
Knight Labs store email banner
3
ashp131
YMS-210x131-V02
Back
Top