- Joined
- Mar 16, 2007
- Messages
- 25,912
I was curious if there was any acedmic work somewhere that would show that physiological replacement dosages of test were safe in relation to blood clot formation. It looks like all of the data say yes. This is as long as it is a true replacement of normal endogenous levels of test and not something out of range, say over 900 or so. OF course the higher the dose the more risk though.
This is of interest to me of course because of my heart attack 2 years ago. All of my docs, including all of my cardiologists, have long given me the ok for HRT. There may be others on here doing doc supervised HRT and wondering how safe from clots they are. As long as you keep it where the docs say, you should be fine. Docs will also keep an eye on your hgb/hct too. They wont really be able to determine your clotting factor risks, but one can assume as long as test levels are kept in the normal range that your risk should be minimal.
IF you read through this short article I have attached youll see the reasons they give for hypercoagulability when using testosterone in doses higher than normal endogenous levels.
**broken link removed**
This is of interest to me of course because of my heart attack 2 years ago. All of my docs, including all of my cardiologists, have long given me the ok for HRT. There may be others on here doing doc supervised HRT and wondering how safe from clots they are. As long as you keep it where the docs say, you should be fine. Docs will also keep an eye on your hgb/hct too. They wont really be able to determine your clotting factor risks, but one can assume as long as test levels are kept in the normal range that your risk should be minimal.
IF you read through this short article I have attached youll see the reasons they give for hypercoagulability when using testosterone in doses higher than normal endogenous levels.
**broken link removed**