Why would one choose to use research peptides like ghrp-6/cjc1295 over HGH

[fatcat669]

I was discussing research chems with a friend the other day and he asked me an honest question - why would one choose to supplement their research with growth hormone through research peptides versus synthetic gh?


i could not give him an answer other than the notion that maybe endogenous GH released by certain research peptides is somehow better than synthetic exogenous GH administration?

 

[papapumpsd]

I was discussing research chems with a friend the other day and he asked me an honest question - why would one choose to supplement their research with growth hormone through research peptides versus synthetic gh?


i could not give him an answer other than the notion that maybe endogenous GH released by certain research peptides is somehow better than synthetic exogenous GH administration?

1) Cost differential (GRF/GHRH/GHRP are significantly less expensive than GH)
2) Endog. GH is more than just "GH" (many isoforms which you don't get from exog GH)
3) Some people choose to run both GHRH/GHRP and GH

Overall, the bang for your buck is greather with GHRH/GHRP than GH

If you haven't read Dat's sticky in this section, I highly recommend you do!

 

[BigTex]

1) Cost differential (GRF/GHRH/GHRP are significantly less expensive than GH)
2) Endog. GH is more than just "GH" (many isoforms which you don't get from exog GH)
3) Some people choose to run both GHRH/GHRP and GH

Overall, the bang for your buck is greather with GHRH/GHRP than GH

If you haven't read Dat's sticky in this section, I highly recommend you do!

DITTO!

 

[chris250]

I pretty much agree with the above post, but I do believe the combo of the two together would be a pretty powerful effect

 

[123cctv]

I pretty much agree with the above post, but I do believe the combo of the two together would be a pretty powerful effect

Been doing the combo for a while now and liking it. Prior, I used to only use GH, Test & IGF-1/MGF.
Blame Dat and his thread...

 

[jm425]

1) Cost differential (GRF/GHRH/GHRP are significantly less expensive than GH)
2) Endog. GH is more than just "GH" (many isoforms which you don't get from exog GH)
3) Some people choose to run both GHRH/GHRP and GH

Overall, the bang for your buck is greather with GHRH/GHRP than GH

If you haven't read Dat's sticky in this section, I highly recommend you do!

I disagree with one thing you said in your post. Running ghrp/cjc combo 3x a day is actually as expensive as running gh. However I see the benefits of running both ghrp/cjc combo and gh together and separately.

 

[papapumpsd]

I disagree with one thing you said in your post. Running ghrp/cjc combo 3x a day is actually as expensive as running gh. However I see the benefits of running both ghrp/cjc combo and gh together and separately.

I never said 3x a day and the cost of your peptides is based on who you buy from (obviously). If you do your homework you can get GHRH/GHRP pricing that blows GH out of the water at 3x ED. For example, a 6-month supply of CJC-1295 and GHRP-6 (100mcg & 300mcg 3x ED, respectively) could be had for ~<$500. (If talking about pricing is against board rules, please let me know so I can delete.)

***DO NOT REQUEST A SOURCE*** (Honestly, I don't have one)

 

[jm425]

I never said 3x a day and the cost of your peptides is based on who you buy from (obviously). If you do your homework you can get GHRH/GHRP pricing that blows GH out of the water at 3x ED. For example, a 6-month supply of CJC-1295 and GHRP-6 (100mcg & 300mcg 3x ED, respectively) could be had for ~<$500. (If talking about pricing is against board rules, please let me know so I can delete.)

***DO NOT REQUEST A SOURCE*** (Honestly, I don't have one)

Yes, but 3x a day is the best way to optimize the ghrp/cjc combo IMO to really reap it's benefits.

 

[DatBtrue]

I was discussing research chems with a friend the other day and he asked me an honest question - why would one choose to supplement their research with growth hormone through research peptides versus synthetic gh?

IMHO the best answer is "tools". They are just tools for your tool belt.

I know a couple of people that choose GHRH/GHRP now after years of GH simply because they are getting what they want as far GH effects AND their morning blood glucose level is lower.

My favorite story though is a gentleman over 60 who switched his wife from GH to GHRH/GHRP and her chronic leg pain went away. They couldn't achieve that level of relief w/ GH. He ran out of GHRH/GHRP and switched her back to GH and the pain came back very severely.

Back to GHRH/GHRP the pain is gone. Guess how much he and his wife use? To be honest I can't remember but it is a very small amount. Something like 20-30mcgs.

I have all kinds of stories and experiences from all sorts of people and I could type forever ...what you can get with synthetic GH, what you can get with GHRH/GHRP...

I have plenty of stories from people who use just GH as well and dose it many times throughout the day and get great consistent results.

...but it all comes down to one simple thing. They are all tools for your tool belt and you don't have to choose one or the other.

Its not a life choice... you can use both together, just GH for 7.5 years and then the GHRH/GHRP or vice versa or any combination there of.

What is more important is for you to determine just what it is that you want to accomplish and adopt a protocol (which includes more then just GH).

I just went by a thread here where someone was considering 60iu of GH administered every 4 days. I thought about asking "why"

Do you guys think that kids get excited by the word "growth" and expect GH to magically transform them?

I think so. What if GH was called cellular repair/proliferation/differentiation hormone? Would we see the same level of interest?

 

[cecray3]

With all of the recent media hype, everyone thinks it's some kinda of "magical superman pill"

 

[cecray3]

I was discussing research chems with a friend the other day and he asked me an honest question - why would one choose to supplement their research with growth hormone through research peptides versus synthetic gh?


i could not give him an answer other than the notion that maybe endogenous GH released by certain research peptides is somehow better than synthetic exogenous GH administration?

Just set aside a block of time and read through Dat's sticky. You'll learn more about peptides from that one thread than you can imagine. Definitely worth the time invested!