Theirs more their likely more to the story that whats being reported , now I'm not saying what the cops did was right but their are some cases that you need to refrair from putting hands on people because of legal reasons. Can the cop subdue the CHILD , I'd be more than certain , but at what cost , if the kid is out of control and the cop graps his arm and disslocates the should , now what ?? what if he takes the CHILD to the ground and breaks some ribs or bumps his head , you will be faced with a law suit MUCH faster hurting sombody through physical force than tasing them.
again I'm not saying that the cops were right and I'm not saying what they did was excessive either , I can't make that determination wihtout having been their or at least seeing a video.
I got my ass in a bind for tasing a 12yr old boy with down syndrome , he had gone off the handel and was in a complete fit , I got a handel on him and was amazed at his strength and resolve to fight. I soon relized that I was going to end up causing some serious damage to the kid if I diden't "back out of the fight" and result to plan B , he got tased and about 4 seonds later was handcuffed. I felt much better about doing that than having broke the kids arms of neck trying to subdue him and once thius was all explained to the parents they completly understood , of course the local media had a field day with it untill the parents came forward and ended it
Again , not defending either side just trying to add a second point of view