- Joined
- Aug 7, 2008
- Messages
- 1,141
I need to cut down on my supps due to $. I use both of these currently as insulin potentiators(sp). If you had to choose one...which one would you use? Thanks
I need to cut down on my supps due to $. I use both of these currently as insulin potentiators(sp). If you had to choose one...which one would you use? Thanks
A cheaper and better option for an insulin agonist alone is chromium picolinate- and its clinical. Never thought vanadium did a thing and it's been around for like 20 years.
If you really think chromium (which I like) is better than ALA, please start going by "strongrhino" again please.
JM
A cheaper and better option for an insulin agonist alone is chromium picolinate- and its clinical. Never thought vanadium did a thing and it's been around for like 20 years.
Ok I guess that's why you are leaner than me.
If you are 4% as in your signature,I will NEVER be that lean,I give you that one.
But I know supps
Could it be 4? Maybe 3? What's your opinion?
So in your mind strongrhino does that posting of a pic win the argument about glucose disposal agents and their effectiveness? or are we bolstering again? maybe another list of accomplishments ? Leopards don't change their spots.PT Barnum was right thank god for you about suckers born every second,as you found a good amount on this board,run with it.
So in your mind strongrhino does that posting of a pic win the argument about glucose disposal agents and their effectiveness? or are we bolstering again? maybe another list of accomplishments ? Leopards don't change their spots.PT Barnum was right thank god for you about suckers born every second,as you found a good amount on this board,run with it.
Didn't say ALA- I said Vanadyl sulfate. No shit ALA is first choice- he was concerned bout price and as an insulin agonist alone, I like chromium better than vanadium hands down. Hell I like insulin better than VS...Still got issue with that- as I didn't even mention ALA....
And it's littlebill to you