Hey T,
Those numbers could be right, but it would be hard to know for sure IMO. Here's how the whole standards thing works and how you might apply it to what you are getting in your vial.
Another thread with some more info I dug up and posted (I never did respond to Dat's challenge now that I've reread it!)...
http://www.professionalmuscle.com/forums/peptides-growth-factors/49508-converting-mg-ius.html
Anyhow...
[Snooze Alert]
International Unit (IU) standards are defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) Expert Committee on Biological Standardization. They do this to maintain a common ground between preparations and do this by defining a chosen reference sample of rHGH, in this case, which to base all manufactured Pharma preparations around the world.
Currently the reference standard is 1mg=3IU*
*IU is a reference of "amount biological activity", which 1mg of standardized reference sample induces.
The previous reference standard predating the current one (from 2000) had a reference sample of 1mg=2.7IU, thus you still see this calculation thrown out there in many write-ups, etc, which lead to some unnecessary debates sometimes
The question is, do the generic manufacturers really adhere to the WHO standards and produce their HGH to the same potency/purity?
Most likely not, thus it may not be a fair comparison between equally represented vials of generic Blues vs. a USP Pharma grade. Something to keep in mind because of the way one can skew the final dose depending on how you interpret the mg/iu ratio.
Example:
so WHO says that per their ref sample 3IU of biological activity is seen with administration of a 1mg preparation. A generic non compliant manufacturer may have a preparation of 1mg that ONLY induces a 1IU degree of Bio activity**...
**not accounting for weight of additional fillers/buffers comprising the total vial weight.
That would equate a pharma preparation of 3.33mg containing enough HGH to produce 10IU of Bio Activity.
A generic less potent preparation (1mg=1IU) may say it contains enough preparation for 10IU of biological Activity, which may or may not be true depending on how it is being interpreted
A) IF the generic actually has a true 10IU potency it must weigh more, 10mg vs 3.33mg in this case since it is less potent and does not adhere to standards (possibly).
B) IF The generic only has 3.33mg, the manufacturer may incorrectly define that it MUST be 10IU based by the standards amount RATHER than the calculation that defines their sample. In this case they may unscrupulously say "3.33mg IS 10IU right"... Wrong. Your 3.33mg is in fact 3.33IU (3.33mg X 1IU).
SO how many IU's are contained in a preparation of generic HGH? WHO knows... or more appropriately with respect to the pun.. WHO doesn't
Sorry for the boring never ending read!