.gif "IP Gear")
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2006
- Messages
- 434
Amazing, unbelievable, but it still makes sense from a legal standpoint I guess.
Here's a copy of the article that was posted little over an hour ago.
Tell me what you guys think?
==========================
Judge may toss some evidence in Bonds case
By PAUL ELIAS, Associated Press Writer
Thursday, Feb. 5, 2009.
SAN FRANCISCO (AP)—Prosecutors trying to prove Barry Bonds lied when he denied knowingly using performance-enhancing drugs suffered a setback Thursday, with a federal judge saying she might toss some of the strongest evidence against the home-run king.
U.S. District Judge Susan Illston said her “preliminary thoughts” were to exclude from trial three 2000-2001 positive drug tests that prosecutors say belong to Bonds unless there is a direct link that the urine samples came from the former San Francisco Giants slugger.
“If there’s no testimony to establish that, I don’t think any of them work,” Illston said.
The only person who can do that seems to be Bonds’ personal trainer, Greg Anderson, who spent more than a year behind bars for refusing to speak to a federal grand jury investigating Bonds. And Anderson’s attorney, Mark Geragos, has said his client will not testify against Bonds at the trial, scheduled to start March 2.
Without someone to authenticate that the test results were from Bonds’ urine, Illston said claims that the tests were Bonds’ were “classic hearsay.”
Based on the same logic, Illston said she likely also would exclude a doping calendar and other papers seized by federal investigators at Anderson’s home.
She was inclined, however, to allow a recorded conversation between Anderson and Bonds’ former personal assistant Steve Hoskins in which they discuss injecting steroids. Hoskins recorded the conversation without Anderson’s knowledge.
Illston will issue a formal decision on the evidence discussed Thursday at a later date. She also will hold a separate hearing on whether to allow testimony from expert doctors the government hopes would persuade a jury that changes in Bonds’ body were due to steroid use.
According to court documents, Bonds tested positive on three separate occasions in 2000 and 2001 for the steroid methenelone in urine samples; he also tested positive two of those three times for the steroid nandrolone.
The three positive drug tests—seized during a 2003 raid of the Bay Area Laboratory Co-Operative, the headquarters of a large-scale sports doping ring— are a key part of the government’s effort to prove Bonds lied when he told a grand jury that year he never knowingly took performance-enhancing drugs.
The judge and the lawyers didn’t discuss a fourth positive steroids test seized in 2004 from a lab used by Major League Baseball to test its players in 2003.
The difference between that test and the three positive tests from 2000-2001 is there’s no need to authenticate it.
Prosecutors said former BALCO executive James Valente is prepared to testify that Anderson handed him the three biological samples and told him they belonged to Bonds. But the judge said Valente’s testimony was not enough to link the sample and Bonds.
Victor Conte, BALCO’s founder, has always maintained that Bonds’ biological samples were tested “down and dirty” and unreliable.
“These alleged Bonds test results and records not only lack a chain of custody and contain inaccuracies, but they also involve people with no formal training,” Conte said in an e-mail Wednesday. “This causes uncertainty and creates doubt regarding the validity of this testing and record keeping evidence.”
Without those three positive tests, the government’s next-best evidence is Hoskins’ recording of Anderson discussing undetectable steroids.
Alan Ruby, defense attorney for Barry Bonds, talks with the news media outside the federal building after attending an evidentiary hearing in San Francisco, Thursday, Feb. 5, 2009. A federal judge overseeing Barry Bonds' criminal case says her "preliminary thoughts" are to exclude from trial three positive drug tests, though she's inclined to keep a recorded conversation between Bonds' personal trainer and former personal assistant discussing steroid use.
Hoskins said he made the secret clubhouse recording in front of Bonds’ locker in March 2003. Hoskins said he was trying to obtain evidence to show Bonds’ skeptical father Bobby Bonds, a former Major Leaguer who died of cancer in August 2003, that his son was using steroids.
Bonds’ attorneys offered the judge a more sinister motivation for Hoskins to make the recording without Anderson’s knowledge: blackmail. Bonds told the FBI shortly after the recording was made that Hoskins was stealing from him by forging his autograph on Bonds’ memorabilia.
“He wanted to get some protection from the investigation that he knew was coming,” Bonds’ attorney, Dennis Riordan, said. The FBI dropped its brief investigation of Hoskins soon after without charging him with any crimes.
First indicted in November 2007, Bonds pleaded not guilty for a third time Thursday after the government revised the charges to fix legal technicalities. He now faces 10 counts of making false statements to a grand jury, plus an obstruction of justice charge.
If convicted, Bonds faces a sentence between probation and two years in prison.
If her preliminary thoughts stand, the government’s case against Bonds will suffer a significant blow—but not a fatal one, legal analysts said.
“It hurts, but the government still has quite a bit of other evidence,” Golden Gate University law professor Peter Keane said.
The judge plans to hold a separate court hearing to determine whether the prosecution can call to the witness stand Dr. Larry Bowers, the medical director for the United States Anti-Doping Agency. Bonds’ attorneys argue that the science of steroid effects is inconclusive.
Prosecutors said in court papers that Bowers “will testify that steroid users develop such symptoms as increased muscle mass, shrunken testicles, acne on the upper back, moodiness, and an erratic sexual drive.”
The prosecutors said they also will call “witnesses close to Bonds who will testify that Bonds exhibited some or all of these symptoms between approximately 1998 and 2003.”
Keane said that physical side effects that Bonds appears to have experienced — such as sudden head growth—is still part of the government’s case.
“The main evidence against Barry is his body,” Keane said. “That’s the whole ballgame.”
Associated Press writer Jason Dearen contributed to this report.
Here's a copy of the article that was posted little over an hour ago.
Tell me what you guys think?
==========================
Judge may toss some evidence in Bonds case
By PAUL ELIAS, Associated Press Writer
Thursday, Feb. 5, 2009.
SAN FRANCISCO (AP)—Prosecutors trying to prove Barry Bonds lied when he denied knowingly using performance-enhancing drugs suffered a setback Thursday, with a federal judge saying she might toss some of the strongest evidence against the home-run king.
U.S. District Judge Susan Illston said her “preliminary thoughts” were to exclude from trial three 2000-2001 positive drug tests that prosecutors say belong to Bonds unless there is a direct link that the urine samples came from the former San Francisco Giants slugger.
“If there’s no testimony to establish that, I don’t think any of them work,” Illston said.
The only person who can do that seems to be Bonds’ personal trainer, Greg Anderson, who spent more than a year behind bars for refusing to speak to a federal grand jury investigating Bonds. And Anderson’s attorney, Mark Geragos, has said his client will not testify against Bonds at the trial, scheduled to start March 2.
Without someone to authenticate that the test results were from Bonds’ urine, Illston said claims that the tests were Bonds’ were “classic hearsay.”
Based on the same logic, Illston said she likely also would exclude a doping calendar and other papers seized by federal investigators at Anderson’s home.
She was inclined, however, to allow a recorded conversation between Anderson and Bonds’ former personal assistant Steve Hoskins in which they discuss injecting steroids. Hoskins recorded the conversation without Anderson’s knowledge.
Illston will issue a formal decision on the evidence discussed Thursday at a later date. She also will hold a separate hearing on whether to allow testimony from expert doctors the government hopes would persuade a jury that changes in Bonds’ body were due to steroid use.
According to court documents, Bonds tested positive on three separate occasions in 2000 and 2001 for the steroid methenelone in urine samples; he also tested positive two of those three times for the steroid nandrolone.
The three positive drug tests—seized during a 2003 raid of the Bay Area Laboratory Co-Operative, the headquarters of a large-scale sports doping ring— are a key part of the government’s effort to prove Bonds lied when he told a grand jury that year he never knowingly took performance-enhancing drugs.
The judge and the lawyers didn’t discuss a fourth positive steroids test seized in 2004 from a lab used by Major League Baseball to test its players in 2003.
The difference between that test and the three positive tests from 2000-2001 is there’s no need to authenticate it.
Prosecutors said former BALCO executive James Valente is prepared to testify that Anderson handed him the three biological samples and told him they belonged to Bonds. But the judge said Valente’s testimony was not enough to link the sample and Bonds.
Victor Conte, BALCO’s founder, has always maintained that Bonds’ biological samples were tested “down and dirty” and unreliable.
“These alleged Bonds test results and records not only lack a chain of custody and contain inaccuracies, but they also involve people with no formal training,” Conte said in an e-mail Wednesday. “This causes uncertainty and creates doubt regarding the validity of this testing and record keeping evidence.”
Without those three positive tests, the government’s next-best evidence is Hoskins’ recording of Anderson discussing undetectable steroids.
Alan Ruby, defense attorney for Barry Bonds, talks with the news media outside the federal building after attending an evidentiary hearing in San Francisco, Thursday, Feb. 5, 2009. A federal judge overseeing Barry Bonds' criminal case says her "preliminary thoughts" are to exclude from trial three positive drug tests, though she's inclined to keep a recorded conversation between Bonds' personal trainer and former personal assistant discussing steroid use.
Hoskins said he made the secret clubhouse recording in front of Bonds’ locker in March 2003. Hoskins said he was trying to obtain evidence to show Bonds’ skeptical father Bobby Bonds, a former Major Leaguer who died of cancer in August 2003, that his son was using steroids.
Bonds’ attorneys offered the judge a more sinister motivation for Hoskins to make the recording without Anderson’s knowledge: blackmail. Bonds told the FBI shortly after the recording was made that Hoskins was stealing from him by forging his autograph on Bonds’ memorabilia.
“He wanted to get some protection from the investigation that he knew was coming,” Bonds’ attorney, Dennis Riordan, said. The FBI dropped its brief investigation of Hoskins soon after without charging him with any crimes.
First indicted in November 2007, Bonds pleaded not guilty for a third time Thursday after the government revised the charges to fix legal technicalities. He now faces 10 counts of making false statements to a grand jury, plus an obstruction of justice charge.
If convicted, Bonds faces a sentence between probation and two years in prison.
If her preliminary thoughts stand, the government’s case against Bonds will suffer a significant blow—but not a fatal one, legal analysts said.
“It hurts, but the government still has quite a bit of other evidence,” Golden Gate University law professor Peter Keane said.
The judge plans to hold a separate court hearing to determine whether the prosecution can call to the witness stand Dr. Larry Bowers, the medical director for the United States Anti-Doping Agency. Bonds’ attorneys argue that the science of steroid effects is inconclusive.
Prosecutors said in court papers that Bowers “will testify that steroid users develop such symptoms as increased muscle mass, shrunken testicles, acne on the upper back, moodiness, and an erratic sexual drive.”
The prosecutors said they also will call “witnesses close to Bonds who will testify that Bonds exhibited some or all of these symptoms between approximately 1998 and 2003.”
Keane said that physical side effects that Bonds appears to have experienced — such as sudden head growth—is still part of the government’s case.
“The main evidence against Barry is his body,” Keane said. “That’s the whole ballgame.”
Associated Press writer Jason Dearen contributed to this report.
