Parabolan Vs. Trenbolone Enathate ??

[Dave_19]

What do you guys think if these too in comparison to each other. Is the Parabolan worth the extra $ for the longer lasting ester? Are they similar enough to get almost the same results on either of the two?

Thanks in advance for any answers on this.

 

[IronMike]

...

Interested to hear opinions on this too. For a while a lot of people seemed to have good things to say about tren enth, but I haven't heard anything in over six months.

???

IronMike

 

[bigbaldbulldog]

hey mike to be honest i have not tried the parabolon but i just got soem and look forward to trying it out..as far as tren goes i liked it very much when i used but i will never forget the difference of when i made my own and used it..HOLY SHIT FIRE..GREAT STUFF....i found someone who makes it and it is not under dosed like i am sure 50-70 % of the gear out there is..too much money to be made if you under dose and get your gear your selling to go a little further..people still grow and your making a bit more money...

I can't wait to see what ppl say..i like the idea of only do a shot 1-2 times a week and not every other day....

 

[Coopie]

I read somewhere a long time ago that shorter-acting esters were better in terms of overall efficiency of product, because they occupied less "space" when bound to the particular steroid.

For example, a short acting ester like PROP may make up 5 mg per 100 mg of TEST. So, 100 mg of TEST PROP is actually 95 mg of actual, usable TEST. On the other hand, a longer ester CYP, for example (and to keep it simple) makes up 9 mg per 100 mg of TEST. So, 100 mg of TEST CYP is actually 91 mg of usable TEST. And, the longer the ester, the less actual hormone you're getting.

So, it seems to me that in terms of "bang for the buck", the shorter ester is preferable and there's less worry about fluctuating levels over time.

It's early, I'm doing this from memory - hope it's helpful!

 

[rAJJIN]

`

Ive tried the acetate, haexcarbonbenzyl (para) and the enanthate.
I still think the acetate has the most kick, BUT I realy like the para.
It seems to be just as effective as the acetate but without the instant
rush or taste in your throat that theacetate gives.

Im pretty certain that the enanthate works Longer then the para- ....
I was using the para 75mg eod and had Very good results from it...
I used the enanthate 400mg once a week and it didnt seem to do as much IMO I only ran a bottle of it so maybe I didnt give it enough time or a good enough chance.. But with the acetate and para there was no wondering if it was working.

 

[Ethan James]

I read somewhere a long time ago that shorter-acting esters were better in terms of overall efficiency of product, because they occupied less "space" when bound to the particular steroid.

For example, a short acting ester like PROP may make up 5 mg per 100 mg of TEST. So, 100 mg of TEST PROP is actually 95 mg of actual, usable TEST. On the other hand, a longer ester CYP, for example (and to keep it simple) makes up 9 mg per 100 mg of TEST. So, 100 mg of TEST CYP is actually 91 mg of usable TEST. And, the longer the ester, the less actual hormone you're getting.

So, it seems to me that in terms of "bang for the buck", the shorter ester is preferable and there's less worry about fluctuating levels over time.

It's early, I'm doing this from memory - hope it's helpful!

Yeah, somewhere on the board is a list of all the ester weights. I forget who posted it, Xcel maybe? If he didn't post it, no doubt in my mind he can find it!