Yes this is old news here. I have competed against Glenn a few times in different shows! Awesome physique. I am not sure if it has gone to trial but he was out walking the streets 24hrs after he was busted with GH and other peptides as well as some orals. Not exactly small time but he and his partner/wife are out of jail for now! I was surprised when I read about he and Di in the paper. He is a really nice guy and a good competitor. Shame they got popped! When the Ice epidemic here is getting out of control as is the e market in night clubs. Again it goes to show, they are not interested in real criminals such as the real drug dealers and killers of young people with their poison. They have to go after reasonable people that are not hurting, but helping many get fitter, stronger and improve their appearance. I will say that yes they obviously broke the law, but in doing so they hurt no one. Unlike the real drug dealers on the streets that are literally getting away with murder!!**broken link removed**
but in doing so they hurt no one. Unlike the real drug dealers on the streets that are literally getting away with murder!!
i can not answer of oldfella.. but, i think you know and i know that ice and e are much more dangerous drugs than anabolics.. i think we know if you list all the black market drugs, gear will rate exceptionally low in the "victim/danger" rankings..
Very interesting here.
So, for the youngerfella(s) your saying distributing a controlled substance illegaly is a victimless crime? Powerful statement.
And before or if you go for a rebuttal here, I dont judge one way the other who goes about distributing my sauce but I am aware of what it is. Whereas I see your statement as a cloudy guise for a minor sense of denial.
So you are saying that AAS is the same as dealing crack?? You are saying that AAS is as harmful or addictive as meth? Or are you just trying to defend the rec drug dealers and say they are no different to juice peddlers? If so that's fine you are entitled to your opinion as I am mine. Most of the peeps that sell AAS do not willingly or knowingly sell to juveniles. Rec drug dealers just do not give a fuck who they sell to or who they fuck up with their garbage. They do knowingly sell to primary school aged kids. They don't care. If you don't think what I have to say is realistic that's fine with me. But the real truth is AAS has not been officially linked to the deaths of anyone. Heroin, can't say the same about this one! Speed, can't say the same about that one. Smoking, alcohol, can't say the same about those either. So who are the victims then??..Sure you can and you just did.
Ok, we can chalk it up as semantics and I will accept your response as accurate and perhaps more realistic than anything he would have mentioned anyways.
So you are saying that AAS is the same as dealing crack?? You are saying that AAS is as harmful or addictive as meth? Or are you just trying to defend the rec drug dealers and say they are no different to juice peddlers? If so that's fine you are entitled to your opinion as I am mine. Most of the peeps that sell AAS do not willingly or knowingly sell to juveniles. Rec drug dealers just do not give a fuck who they sell to or who they fuck up with their garbage. They do knowingly sell to primary school aged kids. They don't care. If you don't think what I have to say is realistic that's fine with me. But the real truth is AAS has not been officially linked to the deaths of anyone. Heroin, can't say the same about this one! Speed, can't say the same about that one. Smoking, alcohol, can't say the same about those either. So who are the victims then??
Not infrequently they are the same. So you could make the case that sometimes supporting juice dealers you are also supporting criminals who peddle other shit and are involved in other criminal activity.[/B]So you are saying that AAS is the same as dealing crack?? You are saying that AAS is as harmful or addictive as meth? Or are you just trying to defend the rec drug dealers and say they are no different to juice peddlers?
Well when you say that it is using an FDA approved substance just without a prescription and saying that it's not a big deal, keep in mind that methamphetemine is also an FDA approved substance, so you could say that those people are just using it without a prescription,
I never said it was not a big deal. Of course it's a big deal. I'm not even saying that you should be able to use testosterone and analogues without a specialist's supervision. I'm just saying that it should be up to the you. Similar to the hormones used to prevent unwanted pregnancies. A girl, even a young girl, not fully developed, can go into an office and demand birth control.Well when you say that it is using an FDA approved substance just without a prescription and saying that it's not a big deal, keep in mind that methamphetemine is also an FDA approved substance, so you could say that those people are just using it without a prescription,
I never said it was not a big deal. Of course it's a big deal. I'm not even saying that you should be able to use testosterone and analogues without a specialist's supervision. I'm just saying that it should be up to the you. Similar to the hormones used to prevent unwanted pregnancies. A girl, even a young girl, not fully developed, can go into an office and demand birth control.
There are some huge differences. Methamphetamine is a class II and testosterone and analogues are class III. That shows that the FDA believes that methamphetamine, along with other class II narcotics have the HIGHEST POTENTIAL FOR ABUSE among approved medications. A schedule I or class I drug is not approved for use at all and therefore, believed to have no medicinal value whatsoever. Remember now, that just a few years back, testosterone and analogues were not even class III. That classification was put in place in 1991. Comparing a highly addictive recreational drugs to non-addictive performance-enhancing compounds is a stretch. A huge stretch. You can't put meth on par with testosterone in any sense - other than the fact that they'll both get you a severe legal punishment.
I'm not trying to make a case for why steroids should be legal. They will never be legal now. Getting a drug classified is hard but getting a drug unclassified? Not going to happen.
Perhaps the age of performance enhancing drugs is coming to an end. For real, there has to be a point where people say, "Gee wiz, it's just not worth it." But one thing that will not change is that it is human nature to desire an advantage over competition. So something will fill the gap no matter what.