- Joined
- Jun 15, 2006
- Messages
- 2,863
I got the Primo through a guaranteed sponsor....although that doesn't mean the compound has been tested yet. I should be in cycle about 4-5 weeks when I get my bloodwork from work.....and then I have a physical from my primary doctor a few weeks after that.I LOVE primo...it's about the only aas I will still toss in. Finding real primo is tough though....often EQ, test prop or NPP is "accidentally" substituted or "mislabeled" :banghead:
Would love to know how the blood work looks! Interesting... How long will you run 350/w primo? That's a great spot to be 50/d!
TB helps us 40+ with the built up years of inflammation for sure...you will like that and probably continue it quite a while.
And lower dose longer duration is the way to go with the safer compounds when you start to really consider health and the trade off. Hope this helps out a few that are starting to think the same way... why continue to put up with the side effects for those of us no longer competing (or never have even)? Tren...indigestion, anxiety, anger. Limp dick from deca. Joint pain from winny. High RBC and headaches from anadrol. Severe cramps from clen. Etc... just not worth it to ME anymore. "The juice ISN'T worth the squeeze"
The benefits now need to be WAY more than the side effects for me to even consider it. Leaves a SHORT list of options. Primo, var maybe. Test. GH/ghrp.
The info I get from these will determine how long I run it for....but I have enough for 20+ weeks at that dose if I actually wanted to go that long. I've never ran anything for that length of time....just TRT and something like test p and npp for 8 weeks added in.
Also I will add.....I get complete labs from my primary doctor every 3-4 months. And my job provides bloodwork twice a year due to the nature of the chemicals we have in our facility.
I like to try and schedule at least 1 from work and 1 from my doctor around the same time. Reasoning is that they use different labs....and I want to see comparisons.
My Dr has told me that lab equipment is not necessarily the "end all" when testing as there can be errors as well.
But most methods are proven between calibration and quality control.....although he has said that they have been alerted before by drastic differences in lab values between different places.
But this typically will raise "flags" that something is amiss.
Sent from my LG-H871 using Tapatalk