- Joined
- Oct 10, 2007
- Messages
- 3,974
Hey guys, im hoping someone can point me in rhe right direction as this is just for personal curiosity.
Im looking for a study that explains alparrent differences in relative strength that explains what's actually going on. For example mechanical advantages vs actual increased contractile force.
The purpose is to understand why a 300 lb bber doing 365 on an incline is considered strong, when much smaller people can do the same thing.
Im looking for the actual data and not common sense answers like range of motion, total work over distance...etc.
Im trying to learn how these things are actually calculated and what variables are taken into account.
Im looking for a study that explains alparrent differences in relative strength that explains what's actually going on. For example mechanical advantages vs actual increased contractile force.
The purpose is to understand why a 300 lb bber doing 365 on an incline is considered strong, when much smaller people can do the same thing.
Im looking for the actual data and not common sense answers like range of motion, total work over distance...etc.
Im trying to learn how these things are actually calculated and what variables are taken into account.