• All new members please introduce your self here and welcome to the board:
    http://www.professionalmuscle.com/forums/showthread.php?t=259
Buy Needles And Syringes With No Prescription
M4B Store Banner
intex
Riptropin Store banner
Generation X Bodybuilding Forum
Buy Needles And Syringes With No Prescription
Buy Needles And Syringes With No Prescription
Mysupps Store Banner
IP Gear Store Banner
PM-Ace-Labs
Ganabol Store Banner
Spend $100 and get bonus needles free at sterile syringes
Professional Muscle Store open now
sunrise2
PHARMAHGH1
kinglab
ganabol2
Professional Muscle Store open now
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
azteca
granabolic1
napsgear-210x65
esquel
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
ashp210
UGFREAK-banner-PM
1-SWEDISH-PEPTIDE-CO
YMSApril21065
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
advertise1
tjk
advertise1
advertise1
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store

A good read: The FAILED war on drugs...

Ivan

Featured Member / Kilo Klub
Featured Member
Kilo Klub Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2002
Messages
2,046
The raw (and ugly) truth about the war on drugs

Drugs are bad. Drugs destroy peoples' lives. Didn't you know that marijuana turns regular everyday people into zombie pot smokers? That's why we have a war on drugs in America: to protect our children from potheads.

Drugs are bad. Especially marijuana. I learned this the other day when I visited an elementary school as a guest speaker. The schoolchildren were well trained in describing the dangers of drugs. On command, they would spout out any number of statements describing them.

But then a funny thing happened. I started asking how many of them were on drugs. You know, drugs their doctor prescribed. Drugs that alter brain chemistry to keep them docile, or free of pain, or to dilate their lungs so they could breathe easier.

It turned out that 60% of these schoolchildren were either on drugs at that very moment, or had been on such drugs within the last twelve months. Two-thirds of the teachers were on drugs, too. And it's not at all a stretch to believe that 40% or more of all parents are on drugs. Mild-altering drugs like antidepressants, no less.

A nation of drug addicts

Fact is, we are a nation of drug addicts. We drug ourselves, our elderly and our children on a daily basis. We do it with prescription medications, over-the-counter pills, alcohol, caffeine, nicotine... and we say it's all fine because those drugs are legal.
But wait a minute, you say. Those legal drugs are different from marijuana. They're FDA-approved drugs, prescribed by a doctor. They have a medical purpose.

Oh really? Ritalin has a medical purpose? What medical symptoms does Ritalin treat, then? What measurable physiological state is addressed with Ritalin? There are none, of course. Ritalin is an authority drug. It keeps children in line. It makes teachers feel less stress and parents feel less guilt. Ritalin is a mind-altering narcotic, and yet millions of children are on it today. Its purpose is not to help children, but to make life more convenient for those who manage children.

You think statin drugs have a medical purpose? Think again. In reality, they only have a profit purpose. These drugs were invented to sell pills that manage disease states in people, not that solve any real health problem. Don't believe me? Just stop taking your statin drugs, if you dare, and watch your cholesterol skyrocket. You'll find out you're a slave to the drug, and no healthier than before.


What's the difference between legal and illegal drugs?

So what's the real difference between legal drugs and illegal drugs? Some people think that only illegal drugs are habit-forming. Yet legal drugs can be just as addictive as illegal drugs. Just ask anyone who has tried to quit smoking, go off caffeine, or kick to Oxycontin habit.

So is there some other difference between illegal drugs and legal drugs?

People argue that legal drugs are safe. They're FDA-approved! And yet they fail to recognize that prescription drugs kill more Americans each year than all the crack, meth, and heroin deaths combined. Okay, then, what about the argument that illegal drugs have no medicinal purpose, and legal drugs do have a medicinal purpose. What about that? Wrong again. Medical marijuana is a medically proven treatment for a variety of conditions, yet marijuana still remains illegal. Even MDMA (now called "Ecstasy" on the street) was long considered an effective "experiential drug" that helped severely traumatized adult patients overcome past pains through improved clarity. At the same time, tobacco smoke has no medical purpose whatsoever, yet cigarettes remain perfectly legal.

No, the real difference between these two classes of drugs is not their medical merit, nor their safety. The real difference is something far more sinister. It gets right down to answering the question of why DEA agents will raid medical marijuana clinics, yet stand by doing nothing while Americans smoke themselves to death on tobacco.

Want to know the real answer? I very much doubt you do. Because, like most Americans, you won't believe it. You've been blinded to the obvious truth for your whole life, manipulated by the media, and brainwashed by advertising that has turned you into a statistically-validated consumer. You'll think, no, this couldn't possibly be true. The world isn't that unjust, you think. But you're wrong. (Take the free Gullibility Factor test to find out if you're really a mind slave or not...)

Here's the raw, blunt truth about the war on drugs. Drugs are declared legal or illegal based primarily on who benefits from their manufacture, distribution and sale.


Corporate and government profits determine the legality

Let me put this another way. You know why cigarettes are still legal? Consider this: here's a product that admittedly kills people. It has no health benefit whatsoever. It is a threat to the public health. Yet why does it remain legal? Because states get a cut of cigarette sales thanks to the Big Tobacco settlement a few years back. Keeping cigarettes legal results in desperately-needed revenues for states... revenues that are almost never spent on anti-smoking campaigns, by the way.
It's a classic racket: tobacco is allowed to remain legal because powerful institutions get a cut of the action. While people die from lung cancer, states get financial resuscitation by taking a cut of every sale. States are trading your health for their revenues.

Think I'm being overly cynical? Let's take a look at gambling laws. Organized gambling is illegal at both the state and federal levels in this country. Except, of course, when government gets a cut. Casino-friendly states didn't just make casinos legal for the good of the public: they legalized gambling in exchange for a cut of the action. It's a classic, mob-style "protection fee."
If you want to test this theory, launch your own online gambling website. You'll be shut down almost immediately and charged with serious crimes. Gambling and organized betting is illegal, didn't you know? That is, unless the state runs the show, as in state lotteries.

It's right in your face, folks: gambling is legal when powerful corporations or institutions get a piece of the action. It's illegal when they don't. It has nothing at all to do with morality, or protecting people, or doing what's right. It's all about money, pure and simple. Just ask all the corrupt politicians in Missouri who legalized riverboat gambling a few years back.

Getting back to drugs, why do you think alcohol remains a legal drug? Because states and cities tax it. State governments are addicted to alcoholics as a source of revenue to fund their voter entitlement programs that get politicians reelected. Alcohol is a cash machine for cities and states.

With all that in mind, why do you think prescription drugs that kill people remain legal? Think carefully now...

If you guessed, "Because powerful corporations generate billions in profits selling drugs, and governments get a cut of that via state sales taxes and corporate income taxes" then BINGO! You win a prize: a lifetime of free Prozac to keep you happy!


Legal drugs generate windfall profits for those in power

Think about it: if prescription drugs were peddled by street dealers instead of doctors, and if all that revenue changed hands in a non-taxable, non-corporate structure (i.e. street cash), then you'd be seeing full-scale law enforcement action against the makers, distributors and sellers of those drugs. You'd also see endless headlines about how dangerous they were: "Street painkillers kill twelve in South Miami!" The sad truth of the matter, though, is that those very same painkilling drugs killed at least twelve people in South Miami this very day. But you'll never here about it in the media. Because the news networks are sponsored by drug companies, of course. (The news is not designed to inform you, it's designed to shape your reality, to turn you into a consumer of whatever products the corporations are peddling this year. Didn't you know?)

Every drug that's legal is legal for one simple reason: somebody in a position of power is keeping it legal because they're getting a cut.

Non-patentable drugs are usually outlawed

That's why medical marijuana is illegal: because government doesn't control its distribution, nor does government receive a financial cut. You can bet your life that if Big Pharma owned the patents on medical marijuana and could set monopolistic prices on it, pot would be perfectly legal to own and smoke. That is, as long as you got it from a pharmacy where prices and distribution could be controlled.
Control is the key here. You think the FDA is discrediting drugs from Canada in order to protect your health? Get real. The FDA is simply protecting the monopoly drug market in this country. It's controlling distribution points in the U.S. in the same way that a crack dealer assassinates his street corner competition. Eliminate the competition, and you can set whatever price you want. That's why uninformed U.S. consumers pay 30,000% markup prices for drugs that can be acquired in Mexico or Canada for pennies on the dollar.


It's not about your health, it's about their wealth

You see, corporate America doesn't really care what you put in your mouth, up your nose, through your lungs or into your veins, as long as they get a cut from it. That's the whole prescription drug racket in a nutshell: it's billions of dollars in annual profits generated from mind-altering (yet legal) drugs that flat-out kill people. Lots of people. Like 100,000 Americans a year (or a lot more if you believe more critical statistics). So if you've ever wondered why Ritalin -- which has no medical purpose whatsoever -- is perfectly legal, and yet medical marijuana -- which has a well-proven medical purpose -- is outlawed, now you know the answer: because Ritalin makes powerful people rich. And marijuana doesn't. Anybody can grow marijuana. Drug companies don't control the patents.


Why I teach people to be 100% drug free

Now, just for the record, I do not personally use any drugs whatsoever (recreational, over-the-counter, prescription or otherwise), and in fact, I teach people to be 100% free of all drugs, including caffeine and alcohol. I bought into the "just say no to drugs" advice of Nancy Reagan, and I actually applied it to ALL drugs, not just selective drugs. And as far as I can tell, aside from the Mormons and the Amish, there are only a small percentage of truly drug-free people living in this country. Practically everybody I meet is addicted to at least one of the following: coffee, cigarettes, alcohol, pain meds, prescription drugs or sugar (which alters brain chemistry in drug-like fashion).

At the same time, I'm not at all fooled by this silly "War on Drugs" charade, which is really nothing more than enforcement of corporate drug profits at gunpoint. If we had a genuine war on drugs in this country that really worked to protect the American people we'd send DEA agents into drug company offices and confiscate all the legalized but deadly medications being manufactured, distributed and deceptively sold to unwitting Americans today.

Medical marijuana is a threat to both the profits and power of drug companies, not to mention the credibility of the DEA. Letting grannies smoke pot in California makes DEA agents look silly. If it were allowed, it would also undermine the billions of dollars already spent incarcerating people for "pot crimes." Basically, it would make the whole War on Drugs look stupid. Which it most assuredly is, at least when it comes to marijuana.
I can understand taking a tough stance on hard drugs (crack, meth, heroin, etc.), but arresting cancer patients who smoke joints for pain control sounds a lot more like oppression than law enforcement to me.

So what is the War on Drugs? It's an excuse to control you. It is a system that keeps the population in a state of constant fear so that heroic politicians can get elected on empty promises to "keep fighting the war on drugs!"


The DEA is AWOL on most drug issues

Where is this War on Drugs when it comes to Grandma in the nursing home, who died of a stroke caused by Cox-2 inhibitor drugs? Where is the War on Drugs when little Johnny schoolboy picks up a rifle and blows away his classmates because he's on antidepressants and can't tell the difference between real life and a first-person-shooter video game? Where is the War on Drugs when 16,500 people each year die, shitting digested blood until they pass out and die because that daily dose of aspirin tore a gaping hole in their stomach?

The War on Drugs, you see, turns a blind eye to the death and suffering caused by these drugs. The DEA pretends prescription drugs don't even exist. No prescription drug death has ever been prevented by the DEA as far as I know. Yet 100,000 Americans are killed each year by FDA-approved drugs. The DEA has no interest whatsoever in protecting Americans from these drugs. Ever wonder why?

The DEA is properly named, by the way. It's the Drug Enforcement Agency. It's enforcing drugs. The right drugs. The legal drugs. The drugs that make money for drug companies, drug distributors, drug retailers, cities, states and countries. It's enforcement at gunpoint, and as long as the money keeps flowing, the drugs will stay perfectly legal, regardless of who dies.

The entire distribution system is well in place: the false and misleading television advertising, the outright bribery of drug dealers (doctors), the street corner fulfillment centers (pharmacies), and the coordinating drug lord running the show (the Fraud and Drug Administration). It's a brilliant system for manufacturing, promoting, delivering and selling deadly, addictive drugs to children, adults and seniors while generating corporate profits and tax revenues for cities, states and nations.

And that's the raw truth about the War on Drugs. You may not like it, but now, at least, you know why it exists.

So I have a common sense question for all the people in this country. If you support the War on Drugs, then why are you taking so many drugs yourself? And why are you allowing your children to be drugged?
 
LEGAL DRUGS = GOVT makes money

ILLEGAL DRUGS = the drugs that the GOVT does not control and they do not make a dime on.
 
Good read!

It's all about the money the government can get from the
sale of drugs. Any damn fool can grow pot in their back
yard so the government can not control it's sale or tax
its use, hence the FDA's approval board. My dad worked for
3M Riker, the pharmaceutical division of 3M, and he told me
that all "patented" medication that any of the major drug
companies manufacture, test, get approval for and spend
hundreds of millions in the process are only protected by
the patent for seven years and they can not re-up the
patent! That's why our pharmaceuticals are so expensive. Can
you imagine spending $400 million developing a new drug,
and then marketing it to country only to have seven
years to make back your $400 million and then try to turn
as much of a profit as possible before your patent expires
and the "generic" companies can start manufacturing the
drug you paid so much to bring to market.

Insane!
 
exactly

Steak Helmet said:
LEGAL DRUGS = GOVT makes money

ILLEGAL DRUGS = the drugs that the GOVT does not control and they do not make a dime on.
EXACTLY and hit ithe nail on the head....
 
IVAN, who wrote that? Its SO dead right! Pathetic, isnt it what this 'democracy' has become. Thats right Capitolism, not democracy!
Nearing Communism.

It was good to hear that almost everyone is addicted to coffee, cigarettes, alcohol, pain meds, prescription drugs or sugar (which alters brain chemistry in drug-like fashion), and I fall into none of those catagories!
But only if you dont included 'preformancing enhancing drugs'... :eek: :rolleyes:
 
Excellent post Ivan! I agree that ALL drugs should be legalized, taxed, and controlled.
No matter what laws are made or how stiff the penelties they will never stop a humans need to change his perception or need to alter his reality. Ever since we have walked on two legs, and maybe before, we have searched out plants, animals, foods that stimulate our minds and change our perceptions of self. No law can stamp out this inate need in humans.
Whether you use alcohol, weed, cocaine, LSD, heroin, tobacco, steroids, self-mutilation, sexual perversions, food, excercise etc all people have a need that is basic in human nature to affect the brain in some manner.
The committing to prison a huge percentage of our population for drug related crimes is bankrupting us financially and morally as a country.
The tremendous corruption that is breed from our drug laws touches all of society. Look at Mexico.
The legalization of drugs would in one swoop destroy the illicit drug trade that is on the brink of destabilizing many central and south American countries. It would bring forth enough taxes to not only balance the budget but provide for the hospitals and treatment facilites for the hard core absuers so that they would not have to steal or prostitute themselves for their next fix. Crime would drop, gangs would lose the ability to earn money, prisons could be used to house serious criminals not some dude that got caught for the third time holding an ounce of weed.
There are more positives then I have time to write. It will happen some day as the price of the drug war becomes to rediculous to suppport and as the old conservatives die off.
Ivan- illegal drugs are illegal not because there is not money to be made. My friend it would be a gold mine of funds for the government and the companies chosen to manufacture and distribute drugs in a controlled manner. Illegal drugs are illegal because America is still essentially a puritancial society. And as those in control feel we already have enough vices they will brook the addtion of no more until we progress enough as a society to realize that it is our only feasible option to end the senseless crime, unfair imprisonments, unstopable corruption, and stop the drug lords from controlling countries to our south.
 
No offense but there is some shady reasoning employed to make your case.

For example there is no comparison between drug deaths caused by recreational drug use and prescribed medications intended to alleviate or cure defined ailments. Are we over prescribed as a society? I have no doubt that is the case. But it has far less to do with government than it does the rapid rise of a society that sees itself as entitled to "feel good" all of the time. That and doctors taking the safe way out and looking to hold onto patients by giving patients prescriptions they dont always need.

There is an argument to be made for letting people do as they wish with their own bodies. The problem is once they become useless and non self sufficient through recreational drug use the rest of us are forced to support their asses and assume financial responsibility for their mistakes.

Like it or not we all have to live together. Society has a right, and even an obligation to promote the general self interest at the expense of the individual. I dont claim to know the full ramifications of widespread drug legalization. But I dont think you've considered the impact of what your philosophy would cost all of us in general. Not too mention the millions of wasted lives.
 
Hudson said:
No offense but there is some shady reasoning employed to make your case.

For example there is no comparison between drug deaths caused by recreational drug use and prescribed medications intended to alleviate or cure defined ailments. Are we over prescribed as a society? I have no doubt that is the case. But it has far less to do with government than it does the rapid rise of a society that sees itself as entitled to "feel good" all of the time. That and doctors taking the safe way out and looking to hold onto patients by giving patients prescriptions they dont always need.

There is an argument to be made for letting people do as they wish with their own bodies. The problem is once they become useless and non self sufficient through recreational drug use the rest of us are forced to support their asses and assume financial responsibility for their mistakes.

Like it or not we all have to live together. Society has a right, and even an obligation to promote the general self interest at the expense of the individual. I dont claim to know the full ramifications of widespread drug legalization. But I dont think you've considered the impact of what your philosophy would cost all of us in general. Not too mention the millions of wasted lives.


According to studies, only 3 to 6% of users of a drug become addicted. So saying that we have to take care of all of those "useless and non self sufficient" people would be easily done with a sales tax on the drugs themselves. This tax would be used for addict treatment and education (Oh sweet J! Teaching factual information on all drugs?!? Tell me it isn't true!) Most people don't know the facts about pretty much all drugs and therefore can not make a sound judgment on whether they want to try them or not. With this tax you wouldn’t have to worry about supporting or even taking care of those “useless” people.

I believe that as a society, we have an attitude of talking about our rights, and none of our responsibilities. If factual information along with personal responsibility is taught about drugs (and everything quite frankly), I think that it would be a much better place. There would be a short time of craziness if drugs were legalized, just like when all of us turned 21. Remember what happened? We got tired of it and stopped drinking so much, because other things are more important. Well you can’t really do that with heroin right? Actually you can, I personally know two people who stopped heroin because they didn’t care for where it was taking them (after years of use.) The problem wasn’t the drug; it was that they knew nothing about that drug at all. No information. Let me give you an example. Many years ago, I decided that I would try some acid with some friends – it just looked like they had so much fun. One good friend said, “No problem, but first let me tell you what it does…” He told me that it causes the brain to bleed and the blood connects parts of the brain that aren’t normal connected. Yeah…. I decided then that I would never touch the stuff in my life. I later did some research and found that people who overdose on acid often are found with small holes in their brains. What would have happened if my two friends knew that heroin is the only drug that, as soon as you take it, you are mentally and physically addicted. Would they have done it? Perhaps, but perhaps not also; knowledge gives you the power to make the choices for yourself, not be dragged along in life. Would people continue to pop ecstasy if they knew what all of the substances in their pill were? Would they continue to pop ecstasy if they found out that heavy usage could hurt their long-term dopamine production and possibly lead to chronic mild depression? Again, perhaps and perhaps not – but we don’t even give people the chance to make an informed decision. In fact we even screw them a little farther by spreading very apparent lies and exaggerations that cause people not to believe you even when you are telling the truth. Did you hear about that crazy psychopath teenager, high on pot, who killed three people while driving 80 miles an hour? First thing, I guarantee if he was going 80 miles on hour, he was not high at the time. Secondly, pot stays in the system up to 45 to 60 day, with 30 being the normal, depending on the amount of fat and lifestyle you have. So it seems that it just was a teenager going 80 miles an hour which caused the crash…..


Society should place itself above personal rights, but not suppress those personal rights. This may seems a little contradictory at first, but please read what I mean.... By creating laws to control behavior you affect every single person within your country, whether they agree with your philosophy or not. If you want to form your own rules for your “society” aka group, no problem. If I agree with your rules and lifestyle then I will try to join. But if I don’t, then I want nothing to do with your group except a little trade (shopping, work, food, etc.) and socializing (stealing your women, etc.) Likewise, I will form my own “society” aka group to live under the rules that I want to.

Government – what it good for in my world? A few things, but the main domestic theme would be protecting each person and their property from non-consensual damage/theft.

BTW, how can you say that can be “no comparison between drug deaths caused by recreational drug use and prescribed medications intended to alleviate or cure defined ailments”? How many “recreational” drugs have medical (including psychological) benefits? How many? Will we ever know if we can’t do studies? When I started studying steroids, it seemed that most of what I found was “tribal knowledge”. This is because studies can not be freely done in the US. (If I am wrong, please corrected me, but most are done under hormone replacement, right?) Pot is now being used for medicinal purposes, despite being illegal. In fact the Supreme Court ruled that the federal government can arrest you in the states that have VOTED to make medicinal marijuana legal. I believe that natural psychedelics in controlled doses in a soothing environment with a sober friend can lead to an internal dialogue (leading to personal growth) that you simply can not have in this world of constant motion and stimulation. GHB was used very successfully for insomniac treatment back in the day. When it went to up to be placed as a high level narcotic, many honored medical bodies resisted saying there was no evidence to support such a move. So was it with the majority of illegal drugs.


ON A SIDE NOTE: I don’t believe that drugs should be legalized at once. I believe that it should be 2 to 3 years out from the time it is decided to do it (which it never will due to purely financial reasons.) This time would allow for the teaching of factual information and personal responsibility for drugs.

ON A SIDE NOTE (2): I used to be a pot head. I don’t care for it anymore. It makes me feel dumb and I can’t stand it anymore. Personal thing.
 
Good responses fellas...

Mike -- I got this from some material at school about the DRUG WARS...it was a link, I will try and identify the guy who wrote it k?

Homer - I agree with everything you said, except one thing: yes we as a society are still puritanical, BUT......money talks bro, $$$$ TALKS...BIG TIME in this country, hell -- this day and age anywhere.... Money makes these decisions easy.

Curiosity -- GREAT post man.


Brandon...about the pharm companies...well they are also a little more devious than you think...what MOST patent holders do it right when the patent is up, out comes the generic but guess what? 80% of the time the generics are manufactured by THE SAME COMPANY only they simply run the drug through a seperate pharmaceutical supplier, with some $ going to them.
I am not 100% certain how it all works, but I just read that Purdue did this with Zenith...SO even though they spent the $$ on the initial research, they usually do make all their money back and then some, oh yes, now they cash in on both the brand name and the gens, they control the market!!!
 
MIKE

Here you go: **broken link removed**
 

Staff online

  • Big A
    IFBB PRO/NPC JUDGE/Administrator

Forum statistics

Total page views
559,694,404
Threads
136,131
Messages
2,780,569
Members
160,448
Latest member
Jim311
NapsGear
HGH Power Store email banner
your-raws
Prowrist straps store banner
infinity
FLASHING-BOTTOM-BANNER-210x131
raws
Savage Labs Store email
Syntherol Site Enhancing Oil Synthol
aqpharma
YMSApril210131
hulabs
ezgif-com-resize-2-1
MA Research Chem store banner
MA Supps Store Banner
volartek
Keytech banner
musclechem
Godbullraw-bottom-banner
Injection Instructions for beginners
Knight Labs store email banner
3
ashp131
YMS-210x131-V02
Back
Top