- Joined
- Feb 2, 2008
- Messages
- 478
I've been discussing my views on the softer look that many judges are calling for in figure elsewhere on this board, but am really curious what the general consensus is out there. I just can't bite my tongue anymore when it comes to this continued talk of penalizing girls for coming in "too hard". I know we all hear that women's bodybuilding is being scaled down due to the fact that the judges believe that they are becoming too masculine, but what is their argument for figure. Their is a big difference between being "too big", and "too hard". These women are still extremely feminine, and definition shouldn't be an issue. Gina Aliotti has been dominant lately. You can't tell me that she has a small, softer look. This seems to be what the IFBB wants, so why is the NPC running from her look? If this change continues, there are going to be some amazing physiques robbed of placings by girls that have no business placing. All that hard work, and the judges will place them below girls that should be in a bikini contest, not a figure show. I said it in the other thread also.........if the small softer look is what the judges want, why don't they just go judge the FAME shows, or a simple bikini contest. I guess i've ranted enough about this for now. Am i the only one this infuriates?