- Joined
- Dec 7, 2006
- Messages
- 212
It seems lately that the debates regarding how female bodybuilders should judged are becoming more and more common.
On one hand there is the perspective that bodybuilding should be judged solely on muscularity, conditioning and symmetry. In the pursuit to achieve more muscle with more condition bodybuilders often rely on more drugs (aside from training and dieting) which can lead to more masculine facial features, that female bodybuilders are being penalized for now. But what if a male bodybuilder came out on stage with great muscularity, conditioning and symmetry but had feminine characteristics in his face such long pretty eye lashes with eye liner and no adams apple? Is he going to be penalized for that? NO! He will be judged on solely on his muscularity, conditioning and symmetry, not his facial feature, so why penalize females for theirs? Of course this is going make female bodybuilders less marketable for products because the vast majority of todays women don't want to look masculine. But female bodybuilders never really were, and more than likely never going to be, marketable for any mainstream products which would bring in good money to the sport so why try to change it anyways? Why not just leave it the way it is with a set standard of judging so that there isn't so much controversy in the placings and no misunderstanding of how to come in to the shows? It's aggravating seeing great female bodybuilders who obviously know a lot about dieting, training and supplementation and have paid their dues and done their homework getting beat by smaller and softer competitors just because they have a prettier face. Bodybuilders should be judged according to bodybuilding standards (muscularity, conditioning and symmetry) not marketability!
Then on the other hand there are those who feel that the marketability aspects of female bodybuilding is more important. And that the if the females keep going in this same direction as the males (bigger and leaner) that there will eventually be no sport at all because everybody will lose interest.
Should the face even matter? What do you guys think?
(the pole that says "judge by marketability" basically means "should the face matter")
On one hand there is the perspective that bodybuilding should be judged solely on muscularity, conditioning and symmetry. In the pursuit to achieve more muscle with more condition bodybuilders often rely on more drugs (aside from training and dieting) which can lead to more masculine facial features, that female bodybuilders are being penalized for now. But what if a male bodybuilder came out on stage with great muscularity, conditioning and symmetry but had feminine characteristics in his face such long pretty eye lashes with eye liner and no adams apple? Is he going to be penalized for that? NO! He will be judged on solely on his muscularity, conditioning and symmetry, not his facial feature, so why penalize females for theirs? Of course this is going make female bodybuilders less marketable for products because the vast majority of todays women don't want to look masculine. But female bodybuilders never really were, and more than likely never going to be, marketable for any mainstream products which would bring in good money to the sport so why try to change it anyways? Why not just leave it the way it is with a set standard of judging so that there isn't so much controversy in the placings and no misunderstanding of how to come in to the shows? It's aggravating seeing great female bodybuilders who obviously know a lot about dieting, training and supplementation and have paid their dues and done their homework getting beat by smaller and softer competitors just because they have a prettier face. Bodybuilders should be judged according to bodybuilding standards (muscularity, conditioning and symmetry) not marketability!
Then on the other hand there are those who feel that the marketability aspects of female bodybuilding is more important. And that the if the females keep going in this same direction as the males (bigger and leaner) that there will eventually be no sport at all because everybody will lose interest.
Should the face even matter? What do you guys think?
(the pole that says "judge by marketability" basically means "should the face matter")
Last edited: