- Joined
- May 22, 2018
- Messages
- 49
i have ran saizen , seros , nordi and generic , to be honest never noticed any difference between them... :headbang:
With all the conclusive tests that have been done on generic HGH on this very forum, along with thousands of personal experiences, how are people still even asking this question?
Those “gurus” haven’t seen the lab analysis we have here proving purity as high as serostim and dimer count almost the same for the provider grey tops.I agree there are good generics. I'm running some now, I believe to be damn good. Grey Tops, very pleased with them thus far. That said, let's look at the key points in the video. To just outright discount it, I do not think is fair. They bring up some valid points.
Again, these are THEIR points made in the video, not my own:
1. The established Chinese medical providers, hospitals etc, import all but one of the HGH for THEIR own citizens FROM the US and Europe.. At ten times the cost. If these generics were on par, why would they do that?
2. If the generics were licensed, they would triple their demand overnight. Licensing and verification is a requirement and not that complex in China. They spend $50,000,000 (million) to setup a manufacturer facility (on average what it takes to setup HGH production.) but won't spend a few thousand to get it licensed so it can be sold on the open market quadrupling their demand overnight?
3. They might be producing "GH" but the hardest part of producing quality GH is removing the dimers. So it will test out as GH, with a bunch of potential junk left in it?
4.The Chinese have often created knocks off that are better than the real products. In this case, if you put it past them to not be able to create a powder that when injected causes CNS, sleepiness, etc, common sides from GH, you are sadly mistaken and do not know the persistent nature of Chinese knock off pursuits.
5. And if you've never used real GH, you would not know the difference. Something to consider here.
All I'm saying, is consider everything when evaluating what they said. I agree, there is legit generic GH. I'm truly believe I'm running some now. But as someone who has never used pharma, GH, all I can go on is my gut and the results I see.
Those “gurus” haven’t seen the lab analysis we have here proving purity as high as serostim and dimer count almost the same for the provider grey tops.
I agree there are good generics. I'm running some now, I believe to be damn good. Grey Tops, very pleased with them thus far. That said, let's look at the key points in the video. To just outright discount it, I do not think is fair. They bring up some valid points.
Again, these are THEIR points made in the video, not my own:
1. The established Chinese medical providers, hospitals etc, import all but one of the HGH for THEIR own citizens FROM the US and Europe.. At ten times the cost. If these generics were on par, why would they do that?
2. If the generics were licensed, they would triple their demand overnight. Licensing and verification is a requirement and not that complex in China. They spend $50,000,000 (million) to setup a manufacturer facility (on average what it takes to setup HGH production.) but won't spend a few thousand to get it licensed so it can be sold on the open market quadrupling their demand overnight?
3. They might be producing "GH" but the hardest part of producing quality GH is removing the dimers. So it will test out as GH, with a bunch of potential junk left in it?
4.The Chinese have often created knocks off that are better than the real products. In this case, if you put it past them to not be able to create a powder that when injected causes CNS, sleepiness, etc, common sides from GH, you are sadly mistaken and do not know the persistent nature of Chinese knock off pursuits.
5. And if you've never used real GH, you would not know the difference. Something to consider here.
All I'm saying, is consider everything when evaluating what they said. I agree, there is legit generic GH. I'm truly believe I'm running some now. But as someone who has never used pharma, GH, all I can go on is my gut and the results I see.
1. The generics aren't legal to use in a pharmaceutical setting.
2. They won't make more money getting licensed. They will have eyes on them at all times and won't be able to ship GH out of country anymore(guessing you weren't around when jintropin was easy to get then disappeared).
4.just no
1. The generics aren't legal to use in a pharmaceutical setting.
2. They won't make more money getting licensed. They will have eyes on them at all times and won't be able to ship GH out of country anymore(guessing you weren't around when jintropin was easy to get then disappeared).
4.just no
If you truly listen to the broadcast on youtube, and keep an open mind AND base it on Chinese law regarding licensing, it DOES make sense. The idea is that they could yield ten times the business if they just licensed, then they do on the black market. So why not license? Good question. Then they go on to say how some Chinese products are knocks off, that have actually superseded the real genuine item in quality and I went, "bingo" that is what we have here? That said, I do get their angle. What we truly need is t110% independent testing. And when I say independent, I mean top lab, independent. With ZERO and I mean ZERO outside interests from anywhere. Not from someone who knows someone etc.
Science > "Guru".
I have never used generic gh. But one thing I do notice. People with real pharm gh hit FREAK status and most people who use generic do not. But does it raise igf levels? Yes