Old School Moderator
- Jun 20, 2002
I've been reading debates on both methods. I've read where some people use it in lagging body parts injected via I.M. for hopes of specific site growth or injury repair. Others say IGF-1 LR3 works systematically and that site specific growth is just a myth. I know with HGH I have seen sound studies saying both I.M and Sub Q worked equally well. So what's the verdict with IGF-1LR3? Is it I.M or Sub Q or is it just like HGH, either way will work equally fine?