I dont see what the diff would be in using trenAce sub q v.s. tren enanthate IM
The difference is human physiology.I dont see what the diff would be in using trenAce sub q v.s. tren enanthate IM
The muscles have far more and bigger blood vessels than subcutaneous tissue which is mostly fat tissue. Water based injections will disperse without any problem in this fat tissue but the oil sits for to long...hell it sits long enough in the muscle...so you don't need a PhD to see why Sub-Q for oils is just not the best choice.
If youre lean enough, using a slin pin for IM injections is just fine. I do all my IM injections with slin pins now.
Too many people assumed that I meant subq only with everything in my first post.
If youre lean enough, using a slin pin for IM injections is just fine. I do all my IM injections with slin pins now.
Too many people assumed that I meant subq only with everything in my first post.
I use slin pins for all my shots when I'm doing short esters, no sense getting more scar tissue than i already have. All my gear is between 50% - 75% EO for the carrier, so it pushes just fine thru the small gauge needle. Once you get the hang of backfilling a slin pin there is no problem at all with daily injections.
**broken link removed**
Pull the plunger out of the slin pin and fill the barrel with a larger gauge pin.
You dont dull your slin pin,which makes for an even smoother injection.
Exactly, thank you for the post.
In my last post I had said a study had shown that subq and IM had similar release patterns..
Also this person, does not note any oil staying around subq, any longer than it does when done IM..
just wondering does anyone use this method?.....what are the benefits?.....dose and ester injected?......any help would be appreciated,this is new to me......thank you
I wish i could find a site that shows in depth all good sub-q sites to rotate!!