My staff has all been educated ,passed
state and national boards and has done all their CEU's pertaining to
there work.
Yours and your staff's credibility OR qualification isn't being questioned.
That isn't even the focus of the thread.
kid1dakota said:
If you think you can be as knowlegeable doing internet searches
and using online handbooks?well,I beg to differ.
Knowledgeable about what? No one is claiming to be a doctor here. We
are debating whether or not it's better to use a new pin every time you
shoot.
You are the one saying you need to be a
Highly Educated Healthcare
Providers to have an opinion on the subject when really it isn't that
complicated to see that a reused needle is going to cause more pain and
therefore tissue damage.
Now whether or not the difference is significant enough to warrant
following another procedure (changing needles etc) is clearly upto the
person administering the injection since not doing so clearly isnt going to
kill you.
For you its a waste of supplies while for me (and i assume many others) I
see this as an effort in taking every step to minimise the chance of scar
tissue since we perform many, frequent injections.
Please don't downplay the credibility of the nursing manual i linked just
because it is published on the internet. That's ignorant. If that's the case
why don't you just tell pubmed to shut up shop since all they have are
'internet articles'.
The fact that its 'UK protocol' is completely irrelevant...
*a needle is still a needle no matter what country it's in.
*an injection is still the same no matter what country its in.
I posted that just to prove the point that the way I (and others) look at
performing injections isn't automatically invalid just because we are not
licensed and practicing doctors and to show that there are people out
there with a qualified opinion who DO share the same view on the matter.
kid1dakota said:
I will have to ask him seriously guys,because if an online nursing
handbook has this,his job and license may be on the line?
All those years to become an anesthesiologist and a couple guys not in
the field have disproved his methods
You can roll your eyes all you want it doesn't invalidate anything, stop
being a drama queen.
You are completely ignoring that there are health care practitioners who
are equally qualified if not moreso who do not believe in reusing needles.
So the medical professionals who wrote that guidebook and all the books
referenced therein are not in the field?
kid1dakota said:
This is exactly why so many good educated people continuosly
leave this board.The know it alls that continue to show up to preach and
not to learn.
I really doubt that. This board had many very well educated and
intelligent people (including you) and is exceptionally well moderated. The
bullshit is usually quite quickly swept out the door.
The only reason it turned into a shit storm is because you jumped on your
horse with your qualifications.
kid1dakota said:
Now you got people questioning anesthesiologists? have you
guys seen what their education level is?
No. The only relevance your anaesthesiologist had was that he performed
injections without changing needles. I'm sure he is fully qualified and
good at what he does.
kid1dakota said:
Point is a needle doesn't need to be changed after drawing.And
the scar tissue is trivial.
I would say the point is:
There IS a difference between reusing needles and not reusing needles.
Whether that difference is big or small, it is there.